Comparison of the effectiveness of various procedures for reducing or eliminating insulin-like growth factor-binding protein interference with insulin-like growth factor-I radioimmunoassays on porcine sera

in Journal of Endocrinology
Authors:
R S Frey
Search for other papers by R S Frey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M R Hathaway
Search for other papers by M R Hathaway in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
W R Dayton
Search for other papers by W R Dayton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access
Rent on DeepDyve

Sign up for journal news

Abstract

We have examined the efficacy of various methods for reducing the interference of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) with insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) radioimmunoassays (RIAs) run on porcine sera. Acid–ethanol (AE) extraction, AE extraction followed by cryoprecipitation, glycyl–glycine (GG) extraction, GG extraction followed by Sephadex G-50 chromatography in 1 mol acetic acid/l (GG/G-50), and Sep-Pak chromatography were analysed. To provide a range of IGF-I and IGFBP levels, sera obtained from control, hypophysectomized, diabetic and somatotrophin-treated pigs were used. Recoveries of IGF-I added to sera prior to treatments other than Sep-Pak chromatography ranged from 85 to 105% and were not significantly different. In contrast, Sep-Pak chromatography gave extremely variable recoveries. 125I-Labelled IGF-I ligand blotting showed that GG extraction followed by acid G-50 chromatography was by far the most effective method of removing or inactivating IGFBPs in porcine sera. Consequently, this procedure was used as a standard against which to compare other extraction procedures. GG extraction alone removed or inactivated low molecular weight binding proteins but appeared to have little effect on IGFBP-3. AE extraction reduced the level of IGFBP-3 but had little effect on lower molecular weight binding proteins. Even though none of the tested procedures completely removed or inactivated the binding proteins, all samples yielded IGF-I displacement curves that were parallel to that obtained for IGF-I standard. Despite yielding parallel displacement curves, sera extracted by various methods gave dramatically different apparent IGF-I levels when subjected to IGF-I RIA. IGF-I RIA of GG extracted sera yielded IGF-I values that were closest to those obtained for identical serum samples subjected to glycyl-glycine extraction followed by G-50 chromatography. For sera from control, hypophysectomized, diabetic and somatotrophin-treated pigs, the relationship of the IGF-I level in GG-extracted sera to that in GG-extracted, acid G-50 chromatographed (GG/G-50) sera was √GG=1·13√GG/G-50−0·23 (r2=0·98). Consequently, GG extraction can be used to remove IGFBP interference with IGF-I RIAs of porcine sera from normal, hypophysectomized, diabetic and somatotrophin-treated animals.

Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 140, 229–237

 

  • Collapse
  • Expand