The binding of radioiodinated rabbit (rb) prolactin (PRL) to rabbit mammary membranes is low and its affinity constant, 0·02 nm−1, calculated from heterologous inhibition assays, is about 300 times lower than that of ovine (o) PRL. Although the differences between homologous and heterologous binding are well documented in different species, the reasons for such differences are still unknown.
Here we show that the low affinity of rbPRL for the native receptor does not affect its in vitro bioactivity compared with that of oPRL. We also show that rbPRL displays high specific binding to the baculovirus-expressed recombinant receptor and further establish that its lower affinity for binding to the homologous receptor is due to its faster and more complete dissociation compared with that of oPRL. Hormone binding affinity for full-length and carboxy-terminal truncated rbPRL receptor mutants expressed in mammalian or in baculovirus-infected cells was not affected by partial truncation of the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor, whereas the affinity for oPRL increased and that for rbPRL decreased upon truncation of both the cytoplasmic and membrane domains. The affinity of rbPRL for the native receptor is two orders of magnitude lower than that for the recombinant receptor. Affinity cross-linking and binding experiments showed that this difference in affinities is not related to selective cleavage of the native microsomal receptor during the binding reaction; however, this difference may be related to cell context-dependent differences in the oligomerization state of the receptor.
Thus, obviously, the cloned receptor is alone sufficient for binding to rbPRL without requiring any receptor-associated protein. The lower affinity for rbPRL binding to its homologous receptor in comparison with higher affinity binding of oPRL to the same receptor is attributable to differences in their dissociation kinetics and in the conformational requirements of the receptor–hormone interaction site for binding to the two hormones.
Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 153, 207–219
Journal of Endocrinology is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.
The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.
More information is on the Reasons to publish page.
| Sept 2018 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Text Views | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Online ISSN: 1479-6805
Print ISSN: 0022-0795
Strengthening biomedical communities
to advance science and health
CONTACT US
Bioscientifica Ltd | Starling House | 1600 Bristol Parkway North | Bristol BS34 8YU | UK
Bioscientifica Ltd | Registered in England no 3190519
