The binding affinities and receptor specificity of sheep uterine cytosol for steroid oestrogens and also for weak plant oestrogens of the isoflavone and coumestan groups and some synthetic compounds were studied. The binding affinities of the weak oestrogens fall within a range which has usually been neglected. Relative molar binding (RMB) affinities for the steroid oestrogens confirmed the importance of the phenolic 3-hydroxyl group and the influence of substitutions at C-16 and C-17, as seen with uterine cytosols from other species. Relative molar binding affinities were very much lower when the oestrogens were present as sulphate esters, glucosiduronate and methyl ether derivatives; acetates showed similar RMB affinities to their parent compounds. Phyto-oestrogens were found to compete with oestradiol for binding sites. Coumestrol and miroestrol had the highest RMB affinities of about 5 (oestradiol-17β = 100) when incubated at 25 °C, and values for genistein, equol, daidzein and O-desmethylangolensin lay between 1 and 0·05. The mono-methoxy compounds, biochanin A, formononetin and 4′-methoxy-coumestrol had RMB affinities of less than 0·01. Incubation at 37, 25 and 4 °C showed that RMB affinities were greater at the lower temperatures.
Relative molar binding affinities of the phyto-oestrogens in vitro compared with their oestrogenic potencies in vivo showed that the ranking of most of the compounds by these two criteria was similar. Structure-activity correlations were deduced from the results. A similar relationship of RMB affinity to biological potency was also noted for the steroid oestrogens and a homologous series of stilbenediols. The results obtained are relevant to competitive protein-binding analyses and to the mechanism of action of oestrogens and phyto-oestrogens.
Journal of Endocrinology is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.
The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.
More information is on the Reasons to publish page.
| Sept 2018 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Text Views | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Downloads | 8 | 2 | 0 |
Online ISSN: 1479-6805
Print ISSN: 0022-0795
Strengthening biomedical communities
to advance science and health
CONTACT US
Bioscientifica Ltd | Starling House | 1600 Bristol Parkway North | Bristol BS34 8YU | UK
Bioscientifica Ltd | Registered in England no 3190519
