GLUCOCORTICOID AND MINERALOCORTICOID PATHWAYS IN TWO ADRENOCORTICAL CARCINOMAS: COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF o,p′-DICHLORODIPHENYLDICHLOROETHANE, AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE AND 2-p-AMINOPHENYL-2-PHENYLETHYLAMINE IN VITRO

in Journal of Endocrinology
Authors:
YVAN TOUITOU
Search for other papers by YVAN TOUITOU in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
ANDRÉ BOGDAN
Search for other papers by ANDRÉ BOGDAN in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
ANDRÉ AUZEBY
Search for other papers by ANDRÉ AUZEBY in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
JEAN-PAUL DOMMERGUES
Search for other papers by JEAN-PAUL DOMMERGUES in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access
Rent on DeepDyve

Sign up for journal news

SUMMARY

The synthesis of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in vitro was studied in an adrenocortical carcinoma after ablation from an 11·5-year-old boy. This patient had been unsuccessfully treated with high doses of o,p′-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (o,p′-DDD) and aminoglutethimide. These in-vitro results were compared with those obtained with another adrenocortical carcinoma removed from a 26-year-old woman who had received no preoperative treatment. The sensitivity of these adrenocortical carcinomas to o,p′-DDD, aminoglutethimide and 2-(p-aminophenyl)-2-phenylethylamine (SKF 12185) was investigated. Synthesis of cortisol (47%) and corticosterone (45%) in control incubations showed that 11β-hydroxylase activity was not affected by the treatment. This explains the raised level of plasma cortisol in the treated child. All three compounds inhibited both 11β-hydroxylase and 18-hydroxylase activities up to 95%, depending on the inhibitor. This study shows (a) an inhibitory effect of o,p′-DDD on the steroidogenesis of an adrenocortical carcinoma in vitro, an effect not previously reported in man or laboratory animals, and (b) the in-vitro efficacy of o,p′-DDD and aminoglutethimide on corticosteroidogenesis by a carcinoma unresponsive to treatment in vivo. This discrepancy between data obtained in vivo and in vitro could possibly be explained by either an insufficient ratio of ingested dose: tumour mass, or a malabsorption of the drugs in this patient.

 

  • Collapse
  • Expand