Sex differences in the cardiovascular effects of GnRH analogues

The integral role of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis in reproductive processes makes it a prime therapeutic target. By inhibiting sex steroid synthesis, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are used in the management of cancers, benign neoplasms, infertility and gender dysphoria. However, the wide application of these therapeutics raises concerns regarding the unintended effects upon the cardiovascular system. In males with prostate cancer, GnRH analogues when used as an androgen deprivation therapy appear to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of death in this population. Therefore, due to the utilisation of GnRH analogues across the lifespan and gender spectrum, this relationship merits discussion. Existing data suggest an association between GnRH analogues and major adverse cardiovascular events in males. Conversely, females receiving GnRH analogues for breast cancer treatment appear to be at an increased risk of developing hypertension. In this narrative review, we describe the uses of GnRH analogues in adults, adolescents and children. We discuss whether sex plays a role in the cardiovascular effects of GnRH analogues and explore the significance of sex hormone receptors in the vasculature. We also consider confounding factors such as malignancy, advanced age and infertility.


Introduction
The gonadotropins, luteinising hormone (LH) and folliclestimulating hormone (FSH), are integral to male and female reproductive processes, including the menstrual cycle, gamete maturation and pubertal development via the secretion of gonadal sex steroids (oestrogen and testosterone) (Flanagan & Manilall 2017).This is achieved and regulated via the activation of the anterior pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors via its decapeptide ligand.Consequently, the GnRH receptor has been identified as a prime therapeutic target in the management of sex steroid sensitive-malignancies, benign neoplasms, infertility and for the cessation of puberty (Fig. 1).
GnRH analogues consist of agonists and antagonists (Fig. 2).GnRH secretion is pulsatile, and therefore initial GnRH receptor stimulation via agonists promotes the secretion of gonadotropins and sex steroids.Chronic activation results in the downregulation of these receptors, subsequently reducing the synthesis of gonadotropins.Conversely, GnRH antagonists directly inhibit the activity of GnRH receptors in the anterior pituitary gland (Shore 2013).GnRH agonists achieve gonadotropin and sex steroid suppression within approximately 1 month, while GnRH antagonists facilitate almost immediate suppression (Williams et al. 1986, Klotz et al. 2008, Shore 2013).
Beyond direct effects on reproductive physiology, GnRH suppression may disrupt multiple organ systems following the loss of sex steroid regulation and function.The detrimental influence of gonadal suppression in some aspects of health are well established, such as the relationship between GnRH analogues with bone health and fracture risk (Shahinian et al. 2005).However, the effects of these drugs on the cardiovascular system are less well understood.This relationship merits discussion given the diverse utilisation of GnRH analogues across the lifespan and gender spectrum, and high prevalence of cardiovascular mortality among patients receiving GnRH analogues (Sturgeon et al. 2019).
In this narrative review, we describe the use of GnRH analogues in adults, adolescents and children.We establish whether sex plays a role in the cardiovascular effects of GnRH analogues and explore the significance of sex hormone receptors in the vasculature.

Prostate cancer
GnRH analogues (e.g.abarelix, degarelix, leuprorelin, goserelin) form an integral component of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) used in the management of localised and metastatic prostate cancer (Cornford et al. 2021, Mottet et al. 2021), as alternatives to oestrogen and orchidectomy (Levine et al. 2010).Testosterone depletion ameliorates androgen receptor activation, thereby preventing the proliferation of prostate cancer cells (Packer & Maitland 2016).GnRH analogues may be combined with direct antiandrogens, such as bicalutamide or abiraterone, which directly inhibit the androgen receptor or androgen synthesis.
Over the past decade we have seen a growing interest in the cardiovascular effects of GnRH agonists.Since 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued warnings regarding the increased risk of myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death and stroke in this drug class.The decision followed emerging studies demonstrating a link between the use of GnRH agonist and cardiovascular disease in males with prostate cancer (Supplementary Table 1, see section on supplementary materials given at the end of this article) (Keating et al. 2006, 2010, Van Hemelrijck et al. 2010).
The first of the studies was the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare study published in 2006 (Keating et al. 2006).In this population-based analysis of 73,169 males diagnosed with locoregional prostate cancer from 1992 to 1999, males receiving GnRH agonists were at increased risk of ischaemic heart disease (hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.10, 1.21), myocardial infarction (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01, 1.21) and sudden cardiac death (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05, 1.27) compared to those not receiving any form of ADT.
Two subsequent observational studies have shown similar results (Keating et al. 2010, Van Hemelrijck et al

Analogues
Figure 1 Indications of GnRH analogues.In adults, the GnRH receptor is utilised as a target in the management of malignancies (prostate and breast cancer), benign growths (uterine fibroids and endometriosis), infertility and masculinising and feminising treatment.In children, GnRH analogues are used to suppress puberty for gender dysphoria and to preserve height potential for central precocious puberty, idiopathic short stature, growth hormone (GH) deficiency or small for gestational age (SGA).

Figure 2
Effects of GnRH analogues on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis.GnRH is secreted from hypothalamic neurones and regulates the synthesis of gonadotropins FSH and LH via the anterior pituitary receptors.Gonadotropins, in turn, modulate a multitude of reproductive processes through the action of the gonadal sex steroids and maintenance of negative feedback along this axis.Agonistic GnRH stimulation (-relin) promotes gonadotropin and sex hormone secretion; however, chronic stimulation results in GnRH receptor downregulation and relative hypogonadism.GnRH antagonists (-lix) directly inhibit these receptors thereby suppressing gonadotropin and sex steroid secretion.A full colour version of this figure is available at https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-23-0309.2010).Data obtained from the Veterans' Healthcare Administration (Keating et al. 2010) demonstrated substantial increases in ischaemic heart disease (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10, 1.28), myocardial infarction (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08, 1.52), sudden cardiac death (HR 1.35,95% CI 1.18,1.54)and stroke (HR 1.22,95% CI 1.19,1.36).In addition, a study of the Swedish National Prostate Cancer Register (Van Hemelrijck et al. 2010) established an increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10, 1.47) and heart failure (HR 1.46,95% CI 1.28,1.67) in GnRH agonist users when compared to the general population.
More recently, a Scottish observational study of 20,216 males diagnosed with prostate cancer from January 2009 to December 2015 found significant increases in overall cardiovascular events in those prescribed either GnRH agonists (adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2, 1.4) or the GnRH antagonist degarelix (adjusted HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2, 1.9), which followed a dose-response relationship (Cardwell et al. 2020).Importantly, this increase in cardiovascular events was not observed in those utilising bicalutamide monotherapy, which suggests that relative rather than absolute reduction of testosterone concentrations in this cohort may confer a degree of cardio-protection.
GnRH agonists do not appear to affect blood pressure in males.In a study by Smith et al. (Smith et al. 2008), 12-month treatment with leuprorelin did not result in significant blood pressure changes among 26 males with prostate cancer (systolic blood pressure (SBP) −4 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) −1 mm Hg).In this study, androgen antagonist bicalutamide was used to counteract the initial surge in testosterone, though without a control group.Similarly, blood pressure changes did not differ between 16 males treated with goserelin and 15 untreated controls in another study (Dockery et al. 2003).

Comparing agonists and antagonists
GnRH antagonists have been developed to circumvent the initial surge in testosterone associated with GnRH agonists (Persson et al. 2009).In animal models, GnRH antagonists have demonstrated a favourable safety profile compared to other forms of ADT with respect to reduced atheroma formation and necrosis (Hopmans et al. 2014, Knutsson et al. 2016), and increased stability of established plaques (Knutsson et al. 2016).
Neutral results have been observed in a study using French health insurance data which found no significant difference in events of myocardial infarction (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.47, 2.80) and ischaemic stroke (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.59, 2.66) between agonist and antagonist users (Scailteux et al. 2017).A similar study in Germany demonstrated that GnRH agonist users when compared to antagonist users were at a greater risk of developing hypertension (16.40 vs 6.90%) but not cardiovascular disease as a whole (40.26 vs 45.45%) (Hupe et al. 2018).
Similarly, clinical trials have not produced conclusive evidence favouring either drug (Sciarra et al. 2021).In the first clinical trial with a cardiovascular endpoint (PRONOUNCE), the GnRH antagonist degarelix did not reduce MACE among males with prostate cancer and high cardiovascular risk (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.59, 2.79) compared to the GnRH agonist leuprorelin (Lopes et al. 2021).This trial prematurely ended at 12 months due to recruitment failure, and experienced lower than anticipated cardiovascular events, and therefore was underpowered and could not conclude on cardiovascular risk.
Null results were also observed in an earlier clinical trial by Smith et al. (Smith et al. 2010) comparing the same drugs (Table 1).Similarly, degarelix did not reduce MACE when compared to the GnRH agonist goserelin in a Chinese study (Sun et al. 2020).In contrast, the highly selective GnRH antagonist relugolix significantly reduced cardiovascular events when compared to the GnRH agonist leuprorelin (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24, 0.88) (Shore et al. 2020).
Pooled data from prostate cancer trials suggested a potential benefit of GnRH antagonists.In a metaanalysis of ten randomised trials, decreases in MACE (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39, 0.81) and cardiovascular deaths (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25, 0.96) were seen in males receiving GnRH antagonists compared to agonists (Cirne et al. 2021).The difference in results may reflect baseline cardiovascular risk and study designs.In some of the evidence, the antagonist users had a shorter follow-up (Lopes et al. 2021).The tailoring of GnRH antagonist to males with high cardiovascular risk may have nullified the beneficial effects of the drug (George et al. 2021).
In summary, there is an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in males receiving GnRH analogues.The comparative safety of GnRH antagonist over agonist remains uncertain due and may be drug rather than class dependent.

Breast cancer
Oestrogen receptors (ERs) are expressed in 60-70% of breast cancers and represent an important component of breast carcinogenesis (Huang et al. 2015).In ER-positive breast cancers, oestrogen binding encourages tumour growth and proliferation (Burstein 2020).Consequently, endocrine therapies that disrupt oestrogen signalling are used to ameliorate disease progression.Depending on menopausal status this involves selective ER modulators (tamoxifen); aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole) that inhibit the conversion of androgens to oestrogen; or GnRH agonists that facilitate ovarian function suppression (OFS) (Bui et al. 2020).A Cochrane review of 8 randomised controlled trials showed that GnRH agonists were associated with a ~20% increase in overall and breast cancer-free survival compared to females who did not receive OFS (Bui et al. 2020).
A combined analysis from two clinical trials involving females with breast cancer (SOFT and TEXT) demonstrated that the rates of hypertension were more prevalent in those receiving OFS in combination with tamoxifen (24.6%, 95% CI 21.9, 25.4) or exemestane (24.3%, 95% CI 22.6, 26.1) compared to those receiving tamoxifen alone (18.0%, 95% CI 15.7, 20.5) (Francis et al. 2018).All females in TEXT and 91% in SOFT received the GnRH agonist triptorelin as their choice of OFS (Regan et al. 2013).The remaining participants received oophorectomy or ovarian irradiation.Importantly, the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes was low in this analysis, potentially because of the short study duration and lack of prespecified endpoints.
In the E5188 trial, the addition of GnRH agonist goserelin to chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of hypertension by 8.1% (Davidson et al. 2005).Interestingly, the addition of tamoxifen to chemotherapy and goserelin did not increase the incidence of hypertension (18.8 vs 17.2%), suggesting that ovarian suppression via GnRH analogues alone is sufficient to promote increased blood pressure in females with breast cancer.The lack of data assessing the addition of tamoxifen to chemotherapy precludes any conclusion on whether the effects of GnRH analogues are due to oestrogen deprivation, GnRH modulation or both.
A recent retrospective analysis of 172,850 females with breast cancer demonstrated that those receiving GnRH agonists had a significantly lower risk of developing ischaemic heart disease even after adjustments for age, breast cancer treatment (lumpectomy and radiotherapy) and comorbidities (adjusted HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.39, 0.64) (Chou et al. 2022).However, no randomised control trial has been undertaken to assess whether this relationship is causal and therefore significant gaps persist in our understanding of the influence of these therapies on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in this population.

In vitro fertilisation
During in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment, GnRH analogues are used to reduce gonadotropin synthesis (Li et al. 2013).The disruption of the menstrual cycle prevents premature surges of LH, allowing for the uninterrupted development of the follicle and oocyte (Albano et al. 1996).Exogenous gonadotropins are subsequently introduced when sufficient endogenous gonadotropin has been suppressed (Manau et al. 2002).When compared to human chorionic gonadotropins (HCGs), the use of GnRH agonists to trigger oocyte maturation reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, albeit at a lower live birth rate (Youssef et al. 2014).Following ovulation, the addition of GnRH agonist to progesterone for luteal phase support may improve the chance of a successful implantation (Linden et al. 2015).
A case-control study showed that assisted conception with IVF was associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 5.3, 95% CI 1.74, 15.89) when compared to those with unassisted pregnancies (Calhoun et al. 2011).The findings agree with a previous meta-analysis which showed an increase in pre-eclampsia in mothers following IVF therapy (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23, 1.95) (Jackson et al. 2004).In addition to demonstrating an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, a cohort study also found an increased risk of gestational hypertension among mothers who received IVF (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0, 2.5) (Shevell et al. 2005).
The long-term effects of IVF on the cardiovascular system have also been studied.A meta-analysis of 6 observational studies by Dayan et al. (Dayan et al. 2017) showed no long-term increase in cardiac events (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67, 1.25) or stroke (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96, 1.63) among females who received fertility therapy.The effects on hypertension remain inconclusive due to significant heterogeneity among the studies included (Udell et al. 2013, Westerlund et al. 2014, Farland et al. 2015).The inclusion of non-IVF-based therapies precludes any firm conclusions on the long-term cardiovascular safety of IVF.

Acute cardiovascular changes among females receiving GnRH antagonist are consistent with normal pregnancy.
A recent study demonstrated significant reductions in SBP and DBP in 82 females receiving IVF treatment that consisted of recombinant FSH, the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and recombinant HCG (SBP −3.0 mm Hg, DBP −2.7 mm Hg) (Akçay & Özdemir 2021).
Pre-eclampsia is a leading cause of perinatal mortality, and may be associated with future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (Irgens et al. 2001).These observations may be explained by maternal risk factors (older age and obesity) and pregnancy-associated complications (multiple gestation) associated with IVF (Dayan et al. 2017).However, due to the small number of studies included and the significant between-study heterogeneity, these results must be interpreted with caution.

Endometriosis and uterine fibroids
Endometriosis is a major cause of chronic pelvic pain among adolescents and adults (Janssen et al. 2013).Conversely, uterine fibroids primarily presents with heavy menstrual bleeding (Wegienka et al. 2003).The oestrogen-dependent nature of endometrial tissue development (Bulun 2009) allows for the use of GnRH analogues to induce endometrial atrophy, providing pain (Brown et al. 2010) and menstrual relief (Schlaff et al. 2020).In females eligible for surgery, GnRH agonists are used to down-size uterine fibroids and reduce anaemia, improving postoperative outcomes (Lethaby et al. 2017).
An uncontrolled study reported no changes in SBP, DBP and heart rate among 18 females treated with 6 months of the GnRH agonist leuprorelin for endometriosis (Ferreira et al. 2010).In the Elaris trials, three cases of hypertension were reported among females receiving the GnRH antagonist elagolix for uterine fibroids (Schlaff et al. 2020).None were reported in the placebo group.

Cardiovascular outcomes in transgender adults
In transgender men, GnRH agonists may be prescribed for 6 months prior to the initiation of testosterone to suppress menses (Hembree et al. 2017).Likewise, GnRH agonists in combination with oestrogen therapy are used to suppress testosterone synthesis in transgender women (Hembree et al. 2017).Current studies involving transgender adults have focused on the cardiovascular effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (Banks et al. 2021) but not of GnRH analogues.

Puberty blockers
The Endocrine Society recommends the use of GnRH agonists in young transgender people demonstrating persistent gender dysphoria or incongruence following the onset of pubertal physical changes (Hembree et al. 2017).GnRH agonists lead to prepubertal levels of sex hormones (Delemarre-Van De Waal & Cohen-Kettenis 2006), preventing further development of unwanted sex characteristics (Claahsen-van der Grinten et al. 2021).
GnRH agonists provide the young person time and space to explore their gender identity with the support of Mental Health professionals prior to initiating treatments associated with irreversible changes.Such treatments may include gender-affirming hormone therapy, which has been shown to improve psychosocial function (Chen et al. 2023).Through stopping pubertal progression, GnRH agonists alleviates distress and anxiety associated with the appearance of secondary sex characteristics.
The effects of pubertal suppression on blood pressure have been summarised in Table 2.A study of 19 transfeminine adolescents treated with the GnRH agonist triptorelin demonstrated no changes in blood pressure (SBP +0 mm Hg, DBP +0 mm Hg) (Perl et al. 2021).However, a larger study reported increases in DBP (+4 mm Hg, 95% CI 1, 7) but not SBP following triptorelin use over a shorter period (Klaver et al. 2020).Evidence for transmasculine adolescents are similarly equivocal.A study of 15 transmasculine adolescents receiving triptorelin treatment reported significant increases in DBP (+7 mm Hg) (Perl et al. 2020).However, two larger Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 08/30/2024 07:42:25AM via Open Access.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/studies did not find any changes in blood pressure after triptorelin use in transmasculine adolescents (Stoffers et al. 2019, Klaver et al. 2020).
Transgender adolescents may have different baseline blood pressures compared to their cisgender counterparts.In a cross-sectional study of 78 transgender adolescents prior to receiving puberty blockers or gender-affirming hormone therapy, the transgender cohort had increased SBP and DBP compared to their cisgender peers of the same natal sex (Millington et al. 2020).Although the authors have acknowledged that variations in blood pressure measurement between the two cohorts may explain the differences, the findings raise questions on the validity of comparing transgender individuals to members of the same natal sex (Connelly et al. 2019).
None of the blood pressure changes in any of the studies met the age-and sex-dependent criteria for hypertension.Evidence supporting increases in blood pressure with pubertal suppression is largely limited to uncontrolled retrospective studies (Klaver et al. 2020, Perl et al. 2020) with prospective studies being conducted (Millington et al. 2020).

Improving height potential
Long-acting GnRH agonists are used to preserve height potential in children with rapidly progressive forms of central precocious puberty (CPP) (Eugster 2019).An observation period of 6 months may be necessary in female adolescents prior to Tanner stage B2 to exclude forms of CPP which do not respond to treatment (Carel et al. 2009).Girls under the age of 8 derive the most benefit from treatment (Bertelloni et al. 2017).In addition, GnRH agonists may be used alongside growth hormone (GH) to improve height in children with idiopathic short stature (Cohen et al. 2008), GH deficiency (GH Research Society 2000) or those born with small for gestational age (Lem et al. 2012).
The infrequent use of GnRH agonists to improve height potential may explain the paucity of evidence surrounding their cardiovascular effects.To date, only three cases of hypertension have been reported in children treated for CPP (Calcaterra et al. 2013, Siomou et al. 2014, Palma et al. 2020).

Discussion
We have described the clinical uses of GnRH analogues (Fig. 1) and their reported cardiovascular effects (Table 3).Data from observational studies suggest that GnRH agonists increase the risk of ischaemic heart disease (Liang et al. 2020) and stroke (Liu et al. 2020) among adult males.No changes in blood pressure were recorded (Dockery et al. 2003, Smith et al. 2008).Comparisons between GnRH antagonists and agonists remain inconclusive.
In females treated with breast cancer, clinical trials have established the link between GnRH agonists and the development of hypertension (Regan et al. 2013, Francis et al. 2018), an effect that remains uncertain among females treated with uterine fibroids (Schlaff et al. 2020) or endometriosis (Ferreira et al. 2010).Similar associations have been observed between GnRH analogue-based IVF therapy with pre-eclampsia (Jackson et al. 2004, Calhoun et al. 2011) and gestational hypertension (Shevell et al. 2005) but not stroke (Dayan   (Chou et al. 2022).
The transgender population faces lifelong disparities in healthcare, largely driven by biological and psychosocial factors (Streed et al. 2021).These disparities manifest as a higher incidence of myocardial infarction among transgender populations (Alzahrani et al. 2019).Whether this reflects differences in clinical risk factors remains uncertain, and may be a consequence of behavioural risk factors, such as smoking (Kcomt et al. 2020) and lack of physical activity (Gilani et al. 2021).However, the long-term cardiovascular effects of puberty blockers in transgender adolescents remain uncertain.
Patients receiving GnRH analogues have a higher baseline cardiovascular risk, which may be confounded by comorbidities, including malignancy and infertility (Fig. 3).In view of this, observational studies involving males with prostate cancer (Keating et al. 2006, 2010, Van Hemelrijck et al. 2010) and infertility (Jackson et al. 2004, Shevell et al. 2005, Calhoun et al. 2011) have adjusted for baseline demographics and comorbidities.However, these analyses may have left out confounders that were not identified or recorded.Conversely, the increase in cardiovascular events may reflect improved overall survival among cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy (Francis et al. 2018).In addition, several cancer therapies lead to direct and indirect cardiovascular toxicity (Crocetto et al. 2023), highlighting the need to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of such treatment.Furthermore, the metabolic effects of GnRH agonists are well established.GnRH agonists led to a shift in body composition from lean mass to fat mass (Smith et al. 2006, 2008, Mueller et al. 2011), hyperinsulinaemia (Dockery et al. 2003), reduced insulin sensitivity (Smith et al. 2006) and diabetes mellitus (Keating et al. 2010).In contrast to GnRH agonists, oral antiandrogens were not associated with an increased risk of diabetes amongst males with prostate cancer (Keating et al. 2010), suggesting a role of GnRH signal disruption in the development of diabetes.
In male mice models, GnRH agonists led to the destabilisation of established atherosclerotic plaques, a process likely caused by T cell-mediated inflammation (Knutsson et al. 2016).The activation of GnRH receptors present on T cells (Chen et al. 1999) may stimulate their pro-inflammatory activity (Tanriverdi et al. 2005).The lack of such a response in mice treated with GnRH antagonists suggests that the cardiovascular effects of GnRH agonist are largely driven by the initial surge of gonadotropins and testosterone (Knutsson et al. 2016).While GnRH and FSH receptors are known to be expressed within the vasculature (Chegini et al. 1996, Stilley & Segaloff 2018), their function and effects on cardiovascular disease remain unknown.
In conclusion, although GnRH analogues share a common mechanism, their wide application and interaction with sex alters cardiovascular risk via multitude of mechanisms.Uncertainty remains whether the effects are due to gonadotropin antagonism, a consequence of hypogonadism, or a combination of both factors.Clinical context with respect to cardiovascular risk should be considered to provide disease monitoring and initiate early intervention (Levine et al. 2010).Raised baseline cardiovascular risk should be a consideration but not an absolute contraindication.Further research is required to understand the role of GnRH and its downstream effectors in cardiovascular health and disease.

Figure 3
Figure 3Possible for sex differences in cardiovascular effects.GnRH analogues may contribute to cardiovascular disease via three main processes -atherosclerosis, hypertension and adverse metabolic changes.Infertility and cancer are major confounding factors among users of GnRH analogues.

Table 1
Comparative effects of GnRH analogues in clinical trials.

Table 2
Blood pressure changes in transgender adolescents receiving GnRH agonist triptorelin for pubertal suppression.

Table 3
Effects of GnRH agonists on cardiovascular disease.et al. 2017).Conversely, females with breast cancer receiving GnRH agonists are shown to have a lower risk of developing ischaemic heart disease ↑ indicates an increase in risk; ↓ indicates an decrease in risk; ↔ indicates no difference in risk.A: evidence derived from more than 1 randomised controlled trials; B: evidence derived from a single randomised controlled trial or more than 1 observational studies; C: evidence derived from a single observational study.TIA, transient ischaemic attack.Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 08/30/2024 07:42:25AM via Open Access.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/