Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author: Peter R Flatt x
  • Refine by access: Open Access content only x
Clear All Modify Search
Ryan A Lafferty Diabetes Research Centre, Schools of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Ryan A Lafferty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter R Flatt Diabetes Research Centre, Schools of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Peter R Flatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Victor A Gault Diabetes Research Centre, Schools of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Victor A Gault in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nigel Irwin Diabetes Research Centre, Schools of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Nigel Irwin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Recent approval of the dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, tirzepatide, for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has reinvigorated interest in exploitation of GIP receptor (GIPR) pathways as a means of metabolic disease management. However, debate has long surrounded the use of the GIPR as a therapeutic target and whether agonism or antagonism is of most benefit in management of obesity/diabetes. This controversy appears to be partly resolved by the success of tirzepatide. However, emerging studies indicate that prolonged GIPR agonism may desensitise the GIPR to essentially induce receptor antagonism, with this phenomenon suggested to be more pronounced in the human than rodent setting. Thus, deliberation continues to rage in relation to benefits of GIPR agonism vs antagonism. That said, as with GIPR agonism, it is clear that the metabolic advantages of sustained GIPR antagonism in obesity and obesity-driven forms of diabetes can be enhanced by concurrent GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) activation. This narrative review discusses various approaches of pharmacological GIPR antagonism including small molecule, peptide, monoclonal antibody and peptide-antibody conjugates, indicating stage of development and significance to the field. Taken together, there is little doubt that interesting times lie ahead for GIPR agonism and antagonism, either alone or when combined with GLP-1R agonists, as a therapeutic intervention for the management of obesity and associated metabolic disease.

Open access
Neil Tanday Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Neil Tanday in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aimee Coulter-Parkhill Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Aimee Coulter-Parkhill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R Charlotte Moffett Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by R Charlotte Moffett in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karthick Suruli Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Karthick Suruli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vaibhav Dubey Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Vaibhav Dubey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter R Flatt Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Peter R Flatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nigel Irwin Diabetes Research Centre, Ulster University, Coleraine, Londonderry, Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Nigel Irwin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The present study examines differences in metabolic and pancreatic islet adaptative responses following streptozotocin (STZ) and hydrocortisone (HC) administration in male and female transgenic GluCreERT2/Rosa26-eYFP mice. Mice received five daily doses of STZ (50 mg/kg, i.p.) or 10 daily doses of HC (70 mg/kg, i.p.), with parameters assessed on day 11. STZ-induced hyperglycaemia was evident in both sexes, alongside impaired glucose tolerance and reduced insulin concentrations. HC also had similar metabolic effects in male and female mice resulting in classical increases of circulating insulin indicative of insulin resistance. Control male mice had larger pancreatic islets than females and displayed a greater reduction of islet and beta-cell area in response to STZ insult. In addition, female STZ mice had lower levels of beta-cell apoptosis than male counterparts. Following HC administration, female mouse islets contained a greater proportion of alpha cells when compared to males. All HC mice presented with relatively comparable increases in beta- and alpha-cell turnover rates, with female mice being slightly more susceptible to HC-induced beta-cell apoptosis. Interestingly, healthy control female mice had inherently increased alpha-to-beta-cell transdifferentiation rates, which was decreased by HC treatment. The number of glucagon-positive alpha cells altering their lineage to insulin-positive beta cells was increased in male, but not female, STZ mice. Taken together, although there was no obvious sex-specific alteration of metabolic profile in STZ or HC mice, subtle differences in pancreatic islet morphology emphasises the impact of sex hormones on islets and importance of taking care when interpreting observations between males and females.

Open access
Ryan A Lafferty Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Centre for Diabetes, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Ryan A Lafferty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura M McShane Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Centre for Diabetes, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Laura M McShane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zara J Franklin Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Centre for Diabetes, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Zara J Franklin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter R Flatt Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Centre for Diabetes, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Peter R Flatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Finbarr P M O’Harte Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Centre for Diabetes, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Finbarr P M O’Harte in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nigel Irwin Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Centre for Diabetes, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, UK

Search for other papers by Nigel Irwin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Discerning modification to the amino acid sequence of native glucagon can generate specific glucagon receptor (GCGR) antagonists, that include desHis1Pro4Glu9-glucagon and the acylated form desHis1Pro4Glu9(Lys12PAL)-glucagon. In the current study, we have evaluated the metabolic benefits of once-daily injection of these peptide-based GCGR antagonists for 18 days in insulin-resistant high-fat-fed (HFF) mice with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced insulin deficiency, namely HFF-STZ mice. Administration of desHis1Pro4Glu9-glucagon moderately (P < 0.05) decreased STZ-induced elevations of food intake. Body weight was not different between groups of HFF-STZ mice and both treatment interventions delayed (P < 0.05) the onset of hyperglycaemia. The treatments reduced (P < 0.05–P < 0.001) circulating and pancreatic glucagon, whilst desHis1Pro4Glu9(Lys12PAL)-glucagon also substantially increased (P < 0.001) pancreatic insulin stores. Oral glucose tolerance was appreciably improved (P < 0.05) by both antagonists, despite the lack of augmentation of glucose-stimulated insulin release. Interestingly, positive effects on i.p. glucose tolerance were less obvious suggesting important beneficial effects on gut function. Metabolic benefits were accompanied by decreased (P < 0.05–P < 0.01) locomotor activity and increases (P < 0.001) in energy expenditure and respiratory exchange ratio in both treatment groups. In addition, desHis1Pro4Glu9-glucagon increased (P < 0.01–P < 0.001) O2 consumption and CO2 production. Together, these data provide further evidence that peptidic GCGR antagonists are effective treatment options for obesity-driven forms of diabetes, even when accompanied by insulin deficiency.

Open access