Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author: M Stridsberg x
- Refine by access: Content accessible to me x
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by RH Angeletti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by KB Helle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Chromogranin A (CgA) and chromogranin B (CgB) are acidic proteins stored in and released from hormone granules in endocrine and neuroendocrine tissue. The chromogranins are postulated to serve as pro-hormones to generate biologically active peptides, which may influence hormonal release and vascular functions or have antibacterial functions. Although N-terminal and C-terminal regions show some species amino acid homology, the chromogranins as a whole display considerable interspecies differences, which prevents their use in comparative studies of biological functions. We present four new radioimmunoassays for the measurement of defined N-terminal regions of CgA and CgB. A new radioimmunoassay for measurement of intact bovine CgA has also been developed. With these assays and two previously published ones, we have compared the cross-reactivity of chromogranins from man, cattle, sheep, goat, pig and horse and compared adrenomedullar content and serum levels of CgA from these species. We have also studied the influence of peptide concentrations and the ionic strength of the mobile phase on molecular weight estimations. Assays with antibodies directed against the N-terminal parts of CgA and CgB showed sufficient interspecies cross-reactivity to allow comparative quantification of the circulating levels in man, cattle, sheep, goat, pig and horse. Assays measuring the intact human or bovine CgA were not suitable for comparative purposes in samples from sheep, goat, pig and horse. Molecular interactions between vasostatin immunoreactive material and intact bovine CgA were demonstrated in gel permeation studies, suggesting that conclusions about the degree of N-terminal processing from elution profiles should be made with caution. Reliable interspecies comparison of chromogranins is difficult, but measurements with region-specific assays may be helpful to study concentrations of chromogranins and chromogranin-related peptides.
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B Eriksson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Oberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by ET Janson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Chromogranin (CgA) has been shown to be an excellent marker for neuroendocrine tumours. There are now three commercial assays on the market. We wanted to compare the usefulness of the different kits in a clinical situation. We have thus measured CgA in 77 patients and compared the results from the different methods. CgA was measured with three different commercial kits according to the recommendations from the manufacturers (CGA-RIA CT; CIS bio international, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France, DAKO Chromogranin A ELISA kit; DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark and CgA; EuroDiagnostica, Malmo, Sweden). The sensitivity and specificity differed between the different kits. The CIS kit showed a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 96%. The sensitivity and specificity were both 85% for the DAKO kit and 93% and 88% respectively for the EuroDiagnostica assay. We have concluded that CgA is an important tumour marker for all neuroendocrine tumours. However, different analytical properties of the respective kits give different performances, a fact that must be taken into consideration when comparing results from different clinical studies. A recognised international standard for CgA would be a step on the way to harmonisation, but antibody selection and construction of the assays will probably still influence the results.
Search for other papers by L Nicol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by McNeilly JR in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by JL Crawford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by AS McNeilly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The granin proteins secretogranin II (SgII) and chromogranin A (CgA) are commonly found associated with LH and/or FSH within specialised secretory granules in gonadotroph cells, and it is possible that they play an important role in the differential secretion of the gonadotrophins. In this study we have examined the regulation of the biosynthesis and secretion of SgII and CgA, in relation to LH secretion, in the LbetaT2 mouse pituitary gonadotroph cell line. Three experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of oestradiol (E2) and dexamethasone (Dex) in the presence and absence of GnRH (experiment 1), differing GnRH concentrations (experiment 2) and alterations in GnRH pulse frequency (experiment 3). In experiment 1, exposure to E2, Dex or E2+Dex, either with or without GnRH treatment, resulted in increased LH secretion. Steroids alone had no effect on LHbeta mRNA levels, but in the presence of GnRH LHbeta mRNA levels were increased in Dex- and E2+Dex-treated cells. GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) mRNA levels were up-regulated by Dex and E2+Dex, but were unaffected by GnRH. There were no steroid-induced changes in SgII or CgA mRNA, but increased levels of CgA mRNA were observed after GnRH treatment in cells cultured in the presence of Dex. In experiment 2, increasing concentrations of GnRH resulted in increases in LH secretion that were inversely dose-dependent. No changes in LHbeta, GnRH-R or SgII mRNA levels were observed, but there were dose-dependent increases in CgA mRNA levels. In experiment 3, GnRH was given as either 1 pulse/day or 4 pulses/day for 3 days. Both pulse regimes resulted in increased LH, SgII and CgA secretion compared with controls during the first 15 min pulse on day 3. Exposure to GnRH at 4 pulses/day increased LH and SgII secretion compared with controls during all 4 pulses, but secretion of both proteins was reduced during pulses 2-4 compared with pulse 1. CgA secretion also increased due to GnRH in pulse 1, but was decreased by GnRH treatment during pulse 2, and unchanged by GnRH during pulses 3 and 4. Total daily secretion of LH and SgII from cells given 1 pulse/day of GnRH increased compared with controls on all three treatment days, while total CgA secretion increased in response to GnRH on days 2 and 3 only. Intracellular levels of SgII, but not LH, decreased after GnRH treatment. In contrast, intracellular CgA was increased, but only after 4 pulses/day of GnRH. Levels of LHbeta, but not SgII, mRNA were increased by both pulse regimes, while CgA mRNA levels increased after 1 pulse/day of GnRH. These results indicate that there is a close correlation between the GnRH-stimulated release of LH and SgII from LbetaT2 cells, suggesting that SgII may have an influential role in the regulated secretion of LH, possibly by inducing LH aggregation to facilitate trafficking into secretory granules. CgA secretion does not appear to be closely associated with that of LH, but CgA expression does appear to be regulated by GnRH, which may indicate involvement in the control of LH secretion, possibly by influencing the proportion of LH in the different types of secretory granules.