Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for
- Author: E Ghigo x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by V. Locatelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. Torsello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Redaelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Massara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. E. Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
Recently, data have been presented showing that muscarinic cholinergic agonists or antagonists can modulate, in opposite ways, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH release in man. The aim of the present study was, first, to confirm these findings in the rat and, secondly, if confirmed, to investigate the mechanism(s) subserving the effect of cholinergic drugs.
In adult male rats bearing chronic indwelling atrial cannulae, pretreatment with the cholinergic antagonists pirenzepine (0·5 mg/kg, i.v.) or atropine (0·5 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly reduced the rise in plasma GH induced by GHRH (2 μg/kg, i.v.), while pretreatment with the cholinergic agonist pilocarpine (3 mg/kg, i.v.) potentiated it. In rats with hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIF) depletion, i.e. rats with anterolateral deafferentation of the mediobasal hypothalamus or rats treated with cysteamine, the modulatory action of cholinergic drugs on the neuroendocrine effect of GHRH was completely lacking. In these two experimental models, an antiserum raised against SRIF failed to elicit a rise in plasma GH and measurement of hypothalamic SRIF content revealed a clear-cut reduction of the neuropeptide. Atropine (1 μmol/l) and pilocarpine (1 μmol/l), added to pituitary cells in vitro, failed to alter GHRH-induced GH release. The present results indicate that muscarinic cholinergic agonists and antagonists modulate GHRH-induced GH release in the rat and suggest that the effect of cholinergic modulation takes place through SRIF.
J. Endocr. (1986) 111, 271–278
Search for other papers by M Rolla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Andreoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Bellitti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Ferdeghini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E E Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) inhibits GH secretion in response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in normal women and men, and animal studies suggest that this effect is mediated by an increased release of somatostatin from the hypothalamus. It has been reported that there are abnormalities in the neuroendocrine regulation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-somatotrophic axis and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in patients with eating disorders. The present study therefore investigated the ability of CRH to inhibit the GH response to GHRH in eight young women with anorexia nervosa (AN) and in seven young women with eating disorders which were not otherwise specified (NOS). We also compared the effect of CRH in the patients with the response it caused in ten control women. In contrast to a previous report, combined i.v. administration of 50 μg human CRH (hCRH) and 50 μg GHRH(1–29) caused a GH response in control women which was higher, although not significantly so, than that induced by GHRH alone (area under the curve (AUC) 988·5 ±506·0 compared with 1568·4 ±795·6 (s.e.m.) ng/ml per 120 min for GHRH alone and GHRH plus hCRH respectively).
Conversely, the administration of hCRH given together with GHRH markedly inhibited the GH response induced by the latter in both AN patients (AUC 2253·0 ±385·7 compared with 1224·4 ±265·7 ng/ml per 120 min for GHRH and GHRH plus hCRH respectively; P<0·005 and NOS patients (AUC 2827·4±281·1 compared with 308·5 ± 183·4 ng/ml per 120 min for GHRH and GHRH plus hCRH respectively; P<0·0001). These results (1) refute the suggestion that there is an inhibitory influence of CRH over GH secretion under normal conditions, (2) indicate that this inhibitory influence exists in patients with eating disorders, and (3) imply that, in the latter, hypothalamic somatostatinergic function is, at least in part, preserved.
Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 140, 327–332
Search for other papers by G Muccioli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Ghe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by MC Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Papotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Arvat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by MF Boghen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by MH Nilsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Deghenghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Ong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
In vitro studies have been performed to demonstrate and characterize specific binding sites for synthetic GH secretagogues (sGHS) on membranes from pituitary gland and different human brain regions. A binding assay for sGHS was established using a peptidyl sGHS (Tyr-Ala-hexarelin) which had been radioiodinated to high specific activity at the Tyr residue. Specific binding sites for 125I-labelled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin were detected mainly in membranes isolated from pituitary gland and hypothalamus, but they were also present in other brain areas such as choroid plexus, cerebral cortex, hippocampus and medulla oblongata with no sex-related differences. In contrast, negligible binding was found in the thalamus, striatum, substantia nigra, cerebellum and corpus callosum. The binding of 125I-labelled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin to membrane-binding sites is a saturable and reversible process, depending on incubation time and pH of the buffer. Scatchard analysis of the binding revealed a finite number of binding sites in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland with a dissociation constant (Kd) of (1.5 +/- 0.3) x 10(-9) and (2.1 +/- 0.4) x 10(-9) mol/l respectively. Receptor activity is sensitive to trypsin and phospholipase C digestion, suggesting that protein and phospholipids are essential for the binding of 125I-labelled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin. The binding of 125I-labelled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin to pituitary and hypothalamic membranes was displaced in a dose-dependent manner by different unlabelled synthetic peptidyl (Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, GHRP2, hexarelin, GHRP6) and non-peptidyl (MK 0677) sGHS. An inhibition of the specific binding was also observed when binding was performed in the presence of [D-Arg1-D-Phe5-D-Trp7,9-Leu11]-substance P, a substance P antagonist that has been found to inhibit GH release in response to sGHS. In contrast, no competition was observed in the presence of other neuropeptides (GHRH, somatostatin, galanin or Met-enkephalin) which have a known influence on GH release. In conclusion, the present data demonstrate that sGHS have specific receptors in human brain and pituitary gland and reinforce the hypothesis that these compounds could be the synthetic counterpart of an endogenous GH secretagogue involved in the neuroendocrine control of GH secretion and possibly in other central activities.
Search for other papers by P Cassoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Papotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Catapano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Ghe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Deghenghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Muccioli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The presence of specific receptors for synthetic growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) has been investigated in non-tumoral and neoplastic human thyroid tissue using a radio-iodinated peptidyl GHS ((125)I-labelled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin) as ligand. Specific binding sites for Tyr-Ala-hexarelin were detected in membranes from non-tumoral and follicular-derived neoplastic thyroid tissue, but not in thyroid tumours (medullary carcinomas) of parafollicular (C cell) origin. The binding activity was greatest in well differentiated neoplasms (papillary and follicular carcinomas), followed by poorly differentiated carcinomas, non-tumoral thyroid parenchyma, follicular adenomas and anaplastic carcinomas. Both peptidyl (Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, hexarelin, growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP6) and non-peptidyl (MK 0677) GHSs completely displaced the radioligand from binding sites of non-tumoral thyroid gland, but MK 0677 was significantly less potent. The IC(50) values were (1. 9+/-0.3)x10(-8) mol/l for Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, (2.1+/-0.2)x10(-8) mol/l for hexarelin, (2.4+/- 0.3)x10(-8) mol/l for GHRP6 and only (1. 5+/-0.4)x 10(-7) mol/l for MK 0677. Similar IC(50) values were found in neoplastic thyroid tissue. Scatchard analysis of the binding revealed a finite number of binding sites in non-tumoral (B(max): 1232+/-32 fmol/mg protein, n=3) and neoplastic (papillary carcinomas) thyroid tissue (B(max): 2483+/-380 fmol/mg protein, n=5), with dissociation constants (K(d)) of (3.8+/-0.3)x10(-9) and (4. 4+/-0.6)x 10(-9) mol/l, respectively. On the basis of this evidence, we investigated the effects of some GHS on the proliferation of three different human follicular thyroid carcinoma cell lines (NPA, WRO and ARO) in which the presence of specific GHS receptors was also demonstrated. Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, GHRP6 and MK 0677 were able to inhibit serum-stimulated [(3)H]thymidine incorporation in NPA cells at concentrations close to their binding affinity. These substances also caused a significant inhibition of cell proliferation, which was evident at the earliest time of treatment (24 h) in all the cell lines, and at the latest time (96 h) in NPA cells only. In conclusion, this paper confirms the existence of specific binding sites for GHS in normal thyroid tissue and demonstrates, for the first time, that these binding sites are present in papillary and follicular carcinomas, low in anaplastic carcinomas and absent in medullary carcinomas of the thyroid. This work also provides evidence of a growth-inhibitory effect of GHS on cell lines derived from follicular thyroid cancers.
Search for other papers by I Pettersson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Muccioli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Granata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Deghenghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Ohlsson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Isgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Recent experimental data demonstrate cardiovascular effects of the GH secretagogues (GHSs) hexarelin and ghrelin, the proposed natural ligand for the GHS receptor. Moreover, specific cardiac binding sites for GHSs have been suggested. The aim of the present study was to investigate if the natural ligand ghrelin and synthetic GHS peptide hexarelin and analogues have direct effects on the cardiomyocyte cell line, H9c2. Hexarelin stimulated thymidine incorporation in a dose-dependent manner with significant responses at 3 micro M (147+/-3% of control, P<0.01) and elicited maximal effects at concentrations around 30 micro M. This activity was seen already after 12 h of incubation with a maximal effect after 18 h (176+/-9% of control, P<0.01). Ghrelin also had a significant stimulatory effect on thymidine incorporation (129+/-2% of control at 3 micro M and 18 h, P<0.05). The stimulatory effect on thymidine incorporation of hexarelin, Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, EP80317 and ghrelin was specific and no stimulatory effect was observed with the truncated GH-releasing peptide EP51389 or the non-peptidyl GHS MK-0677. In competitive binding studies, (125)I-labeled Tyr-Ala-hexarelin was used as radioligand and competition curves showed displacement with hexarelin, Tyr-Ala-hexarelin, EP80317 and ghrelin, whereas MK-0677 and EP51389 produced very little displacement at 1 micro M concentration, adding further support for an alternative subtype binding site in the heart compared with the pituitary. In conclusion, we have demonstrated a dose-dependent and specific stimulation of cardiomyocyte thymidine incorporation by natural and synthetic GHS analogues, suggesting increased cell proliferation and binding of GHS to H9c2 cardiomyocyte cell membranes. These findings support potential peripheral effects of GHS on the cardiovascular system independent of an increased GH secretion.
Search for other papers by A. Torsello in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. Panzeri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P. Cermenati in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. C. Caroleo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Ghigo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Camanni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. E. Müller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V. Locatelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
The involvement of the cholinergic system in GH secretion has recently acquired increasing importance. Data have been presented suggesting that in rats the effect of cholinergic modulation on GH secretion takes place through inhibition or stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIF) release. To investigate further the significance of cholinergic-SRIF link and its role in the regulation of GH secretion, the action of cholinergic agonist and antagonist drugs in the GH short-loop feedback mechanism mediated by SRIF was investigated. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of 0·2 or 2·0 μg GH/rat into the lateral brain ventricle of adult male rats induced a significant reduction in the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 2 μg/kg, i.v.)-induced peak GH rise, but only the 2·0 μg dose reduced also the GH-integrated area after administration of GHRH. This effect was absent after central administration of 20·0μg GH/rat, due probably to leakage of some GH from the cerebral ventricle into the systemic circulation. Pretreatment with cysteamine (300 mg/kg, s.c.), a known depletor of hypothalamic SRIF, or with anti-SRIF serum (0·5 ml/rat) completely counteracted the lessening of the GH response to GHRH induced by 2·0μg GH injected i.c.v. Similarly, pretreatment with the cholinergic agonist pilocarpine (3 mg/kg, i.v.) completely antagonized the inhibitory effect of central infusion of GH on the GHRH-induced GH response. Atropine (1·0 mg/kg, i.v.), a muscarinic cholinergic antagonist, strikingly inhibited the GHRH-induced GH rise, but when given in combination with i.c.v. infusion of GH there was no additive inhibitory effect. These data reinforce the idea that the GH autofeedback triggered by i.c.v. infusion of GH is mediated by enhanced SRIF release, and suggest that the hypothalamic cholinergic system plays a major role in this mechanism.
J. Endocr. (1988) 117, 273–281