Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for

  • Author: M Stridsberg x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
E Wassberg
Search for other papers by E Wassberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Stridsberg
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R Christofferson
Search for other papers by R Christofferson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Abstract

A novel animal experimental model involving the human, poorly differentiated, and adrenergic neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y xenotransplanted to subcutaneous tissue of 13 nude rats (WAG rnu/rnu) was used to investigate the usefulness of six proposed neuroblastoma markers. It was shown that the plasma concentrations of human chromogranin A (CgA) as measured by RIA were directly proportional to tumour volume (r=0·83, P<0·001). To rule out possible liberation of CgA by tumour cell lysis, the CgA degradation product pancreastatin was also measured in plasma by a specific RIA, but was not detectable. Plasma neurone-specific enolase (NSE) was elevated in tumour-bearing animals (P<0·01), but did not correlate with tumour volume (r=0·49, P>0·05). Urine homovanillic acid (HVA), detected by HPLC, was elevated in tumour-bearing animals (P<0·01), but did not correlate with tumour volume (r=−0·32, P>0·05). Urine vanillyl mandelic acid was not detectable. Urine dopamine was found in low concentrations that did not correlate with tumour volume. In summary, although plasma NSE and urinary HVA were elevated in tumour-bearing animals only plasma CgA correlated with tumour burden. This makes CgA a promising biochemical marker for neuroblastomas.

Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 151, 225–230

Restricted access
M Stridsberg
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
RH Angeletti
Search for other papers by RH Angeletti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
KB Helle
Search for other papers by KB Helle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Chromogranin A (CgA) and chromogranin B (CgB) are acidic proteins stored in and released from hormone granules in endocrine and neuroendocrine tissue. The chromogranins are postulated to serve as pro-hormones to generate biologically active peptides, which may influence hormonal release and vascular functions or have antibacterial functions. Although N-terminal and C-terminal regions show some species amino acid homology, the chromogranins as a whole display considerable interspecies differences, which prevents their use in comparative studies of biological functions. We present four new radioimmunoassays for the measurement of defined N-terminal regions of CgA and CgB. A new radioimmunoassay for measurement of intact bovine CgA has also been developed. With these assays and two previously published ones, we have compared the cross-reactivity of chromogranins from man, cattle, sheep, goat, pig and horse and compared adrenomedullar content and serum levels of CgA from these species. We have also studied the influence of peptide concentrations and the ionic strength of the mobile phase on molecular weight estimations. Assays with antibodies directed against the N-terminal parts of CgA and CgB showed sufficient interspecies cross-reactivity to allow comparative quantification of the circulating levels in man, cattle, sheep, goat, pig and horse. Assays measuring the intact human or bovine CgA were not suitable for comparative purposes in samples from sheep, goat, pig and horse. Molecular interactions between vasostatin immunoreactive material and intact bovine CgA were demonstrated in gel permeation studies, suggesting that conclusions about the degree of N-terminal processing from elution profiles should be made with caution. Reliable interspecies comparison of chromogranins is difficult, but measurements with region-specific assays may be helpful to study concentrations of chromogranins and chromogranin-related peptides.

Free access
M Stridsberg
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B Eriksson
Search for other papers by B Eriksson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K Oberg
Search for other papers by K Oberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
ET Janson
Search for other papers by ET Janson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Chromogranin (CgA) has been shown to be an excellent marker for neuroendocrine tumours. There are now three commercial assays on the market. We wanted to compare the usefulness of the different kits in a clinical situation. We have thus measured CgA in 77 patients and compared the results from the different methods. CgA was measured with three different commercial kits according to the recommendations from the manufacturers (CGA-RIA CT; CIS bio international, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France, DAKO Chromogranin A ELISA kit; DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark and CgA; EuroDiagnostica, Malmo, Sweden). The sensitivity and specificity differed between the different kits. The CIS kit showed a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 96%. The sensitivity and specificity were both 85% for the DAKO kit and 93% and 88% respectively for the EuroDiagnostica assay. We have concluded that CgA is an important tumour marker for all neuroendocrine tumours. However, different analytical properties of the respective kits give different performances, a fact that must be taken into consideration when comparing results from different clinical studies. A recognised international standard for CgA would be a step on the way to harmonisation, but antibody selection and construction of the assays will probably still influence the results.

Free access
M Stridsberg
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K Öberg
Search for other papers by K Öberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Q Li
Search for other papers by Q Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
U Engström
Search for other papers by U Engström in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
G Lundqvist
Search for other papers by G Lundqvist in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Abstract

Chromogranins and/or secretogranins constitute a family of water-soluble acidic glycoproteins that are present in almost all endocrine, neuroendocrine and neuronal tissue. Antibodies against chromogranins have been widely used for immunohistochemical staining of endocrine tissue and tumours of neuroendocrine origin. Furthermore, measurements of circulating chromogranin A have been used as a reliable marker for neuroendocrine tumour growth. In this study, we describe the development of specific antibodies against chromogranin A, chromogranin B (secretogranin I), chromogranin C (secretogranin II) and pancreastatin. The antibodies were used for immunohistochemical staining of normal and neoplastic neuroendocrine tissue and development of reliable radioimmunoassays for chromogranin A, chromogranin B, chromogranin C and pancreastatin. In 44 patients with carcinoid tumours, 17 patients with sporadic endocrine pancreatic tumours and 11 patients with endocrine pancreatic tumours and the multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 syndrome, plasma measurements revealed elevated chromogranin A levels in 99%, elevated chromogranin B in 88%, elevated chromogranin C in 6% and elevated pancreastatin in 46% of the patients. Urinary measurements revealed elevated levels in 39%, 15%, 14% and 33% of the patients respectively. Gel permeation chromatography of plasma and urine showed that circulating chromogranin A, and immunoreactive fragments of chromogranin A, had a higher molecular weight distribution than the chromogranin A fragments excreted to the urine. Furthermore, it was noted that most of the patients excreting chromogranin A fragments to the urine had previously been treated with streptozotocin, a cytotoxic agent known to induce renal tubular dysfunction. The antibodies raised proved useful for immunohistochemical staining and visualised endocrine cells in pancreatic islets, adrenal medulla and the small intestine as well as in endocrine pancreatic tumours, pheochromocytoma and midgut carcinoid tumours. In conclusion, the antibodies raised were useful for both immunohistochemical staining of normal tissue and endocrine tumours as well as development of specific radioimmunoassays for plasma measurements of the different chromogranins. Furthermore, we show that plasma measurements of chromogranin A and B were superior to measurements of chromogranin C and pancreastatin and plasma measurements of the different chromogranins were more reliable as markers for tumour growth than the corresponding urine measurements.

Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 144, 49–59

Restricted access
L Nicol
Search for other papers by L Nicol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
McNeilly JR
Search for other papers by McNeilly JR in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Stridsberg
Search for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
JL Crawford
Search for other papers by JL Crawford in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
AS McNeilly
Search for other papers by AS McNeilly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The granin proteins secretogranin II (SgII) and chromogranin A (CgA) are commonly found associated with LH and/or FSH within specialised secretory granules in gonadotroph cells, and it is possible that they play an important role in the differential secretion of the gonadotrophins. In this study we have examined the regulation of the biosynthesis and secretion of SgII and CgA, in relation to LH secretion, in the LbetaT2 mouse pituitary gonadotroph cell line. Three experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of oestradiol (E2) and dexamethasone (Dex) in the presence and absence of GnRH (experiment 1), differing GnRH concentrations (experiment 2) and alterations in GnRH pulse frequency (experiment 3). In experiment 1, exposure to E2, Dex or E2+Dex, either with or without GnRH treatment, resulted in increased LH secretion. Steroids alone had no effect on LHbeta mRNA levels, but in the presence of GnRH LHbeta mRNA levels were increased in Dex- and E2+Dex-treated cells. GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) mRNA levels were up-regulated by Dex and E2+Dex, but were unaffected by GnRH. There were no steroid-induced changes in SgII or CgA mRNA, but increased levels of CgA mRNA were observed after GnRH treatment in cells cultured in the presence of Dex. In experiment 2, increasing concentrations of GnRH resulted in increases in LH secretion that were inversely dose-dependent. No changes in LHbeta, GnRH-R or SgII mRNA levels were observed, but there were dose-dependent increases in CgA mRNA levels. In experiment 3, GnRH was given as either 1 pulse/day or 4 pulses/day for 3 days. Both pulse regimes resulted in increased LH, SgII and CgA secretion compared with controls during the first 15 min pulse on day 3. Exposure to GnRH at 4 pulses/day increased LH and SgII secretion compared with controls during all 4 pulses, but secretion of both proteins was reduced during pulses 2-4 compared with pulse 1. CgA secretion also increased due to GnRH in pulse 1, but was decreased by GnRH treatment during pulse 2, and unchanged by GnRH during pulses 3 and 4. Total daily secretion of LH and SgII from cells given 1 pulse/day of GnRH increased compared with controls on all three treatment days, while total CgA secretion increased in response to GnRH on days 2 and 3 only. Intracellular levels of SgII, but not LH, decreased after GnRH treatment. In contrast, intracellular CgA was increased, but only after 4 pulses/day of GnRH. Levels of LHbeta, but not SgII, mRNA were increased by both pulse regimes, while CgA mRNA levels increased after 1 pulse/day of GnRH. These results indicate that there is a close correlation between the GnRH-stimulated release of LH and SgII from LbetaT2 cells, suggesting that SgII may have an influential role in the regulated secretion of LH, possibly by inducing LH aggregation to facilitate trafficking into secretory granules. CgA secretion does not appear to be closely associated with that of LH, but CgA expression does appear to be regulated by GnRH, which may indicate involvement in the control of LH secretion, possibly by influencing the proportion of LH in the different types of secretory granules.

Free access
M. Stridsberg
Search for other papers by M. Stridsberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
U. Hellman
Search for other papers by U. Hellman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
E. Wilander
Search for other papers by E. Wilander in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. Lundqvist
Search for other papers by G. Lundqvist in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K. Hellsing
Search for other papers by K. Hellsing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
K. Öberg
Search for other papers by K. Öberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

ABSTRACT

Chromogranin A is a well-known protein constituent in granules of neuroendocrine cells. It is also known that plasma levels of chromogranin A increase considerably in patients with neuroendocrine tumours and thus chromogranin A is used as a marker for these tumours. In the present study, we have shown that fragments of chromogranin A are excreted into the urine in some patients with carcinoid tumours. The chromogranin A molecule appeared in the urine N-terminally cleaved at amino acid positions 116 and 210, which are previously reported cleavage sites of the molecule. The fragments identified were mainly of about 35 kDa in size. The unprocessed chromogranin A molecule was not excreted in the urine. Five out of 40 patients excreting the fragments had slight tubular dysfunction in the kidneys. We also showed that these renally excreted split products of chromogranin A were immunogenic and could be used for production of antibodies against chromogranin A. These antibodies were used both for immunocytochemistry and for the development of a specific and sensitive radioimmunoassay for chromogranin A and its fragments. Measurements of plasma chromogranin A by radioimmunoassay appeared to be a better marker for tumour growth than were measurements of chromogranin A in the urine.

Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 139, 329–337

Restricted access