Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: A Giustina x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
LK Conley
Search for other papers by LK Conley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
RC Gaillard
Search for other papers by RC Gaillard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A Giustina
Search for other papers by A Giustina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
RS Brogan
Search for other papers by RS Brogan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
WB Wehrenberg
Search for other papers by WB Wehrenberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

We have previously shown that hexarelin, a novel GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), is able to elicit GH release when administered i.v., s.c. or by mouth and that it is a more potent GH secretagogue than GHRP-6. In the current study, we investigated the effects of hexarelin administered as repeated doses at 2 h intervals or as a continuous 6, 30 or 174 h infusion to conscious male rats. In the first experiment, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared with dual indwelling jugular catheters. On the day of experimentation, these animals received three 25 micrograms/kg i.v. boluses of hexarelin at 2 h intervals with blood sampling at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after each dose. The mean peak GH response and the mean area under the GH response curve (AUC) for the 30 min after each administration were calculated and are reported as the mean +/- S.E.M. For both the peak and AUC results there was a significant (P < 0.05) difference in the GH response noted between the first (peak 301 +/- 37 ng/ml; AUC 5585 +/- 700 ng/ml per 30 min) and second (peak 149 +/- 47 ng/ml; AUC 3056 +/- 908 ng/ml per 30 min) injections of hexarelin, but not between the first and third (peak 214 +/- 49 ng/ml; AUC 3862 +/- 844 ng/ml per 30 min). In a second series of experiments, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats received continuous infusions (100 micrograms/h) of hexarelin or saline (1 ml/h) for 6, 30 or 174 h. Blood samples were collected every 20 min for the duration of the 6 h infusion and for the last 6 h of the two longer hexarelin infusions. Plasma GH concentrations peaked within 40 min of the initiation of infusion, but soon returned to basal levels. Mean plasma GH concentrations did not differ between any of the treatment groups, nor did any of the parameters of pulsatile hormone release analyzed. No significant differences in plasma corticosterone concentrations were noted between any of the treatment groups. On the other hand, while neither the 6 h (941 +/- 70 ng/ml) nor the 30 h (954 +/- 70 ng/ml) hexarelin infusions resulted in a significant increase in the plasma IGF-I concentrations over those noted in the saline controls (935 +/- 65 ng/ml), a 174 h hexarelin infusion did elicit a significant increase (1289 +/- 42 ng/ml; P < 0.05). Thus it appears that, while continuous exposure to hexarelin does not disrupt normal GH cycling, it may (after up to 174 h of exposure) alter other components of the growth axis. In addition, since the character of pulsatile GH release remained unaltered in response to the hexarelin infusion, it appears that this GHRP may not act by suppression of functional somatostatin tone as has been suggested previously.

Free access
A Giustina
Search for other papers by A Giustina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A R Bussi
Search for other papers by A R Bussi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R Deghenghi
Search for other papers by R Deghenghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B Imbimbo
Search for other papers by B Imbimbo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Licini
Search for other papers by M Licini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C Poiesi
Search for other papers by C Poiesi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
W B Wehrenberg
Search for other papers by W B Wehrenberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Abstract

The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of hexarelin, a novel GH-releasing peptide-6 analog, and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (alone or in combination) on GH secretion in adult patients with increased somatostatin tone due to chronic glucocorticoid excess. We studied seven adult patients undergoing long-term (no less than 6 months) immunosuppressive glucocorticoid treatment for non-endocrine diseases (six females and one male, age range 42–68 years) and one subject (female, age 31 years) with endogenous hypercortisolism due to adrenal adenoma. Six normal subjects (four females and two males) matched for sex and age with the patients and not undergoing any therapy served as controls. All the subjects underwent the following three tests in random order: (1) human GHRH (1–29)NH2 (100 μg in 1 ml saline) injected as an i.v. bolus at 0 min, (2) hexarelin (100 μg in 1 ml saline) injected as an i.v. bolus at 0 min and (3) hexarelin (100 μg in 1 ml of saline) plus GHRH (100 μg in 1 ml saline) injected as an i.v. bolus at 0 min. After GHRH alone the patients with glucocorticoid excess showed a blunted GH response as compared with normal subjects (median delta GH: 0·9, range 0–5·6 μg/l vs 7·1, range 0·3–14·9 μg/l). No significant differences were observed in the steroid-treated group with respect to normal subjects after hexarelin alone (median delta GH: 15·5, range 1·9–45·2 μg/l vs 17·9, range 5·5–53·9 μg/l). The GH responses after the combined stimuli were significantly decreased in the patients with glucocorticoid excess as compared with normal subjects (median delta GH: 43·5, range 21–56·9 μg/l vs 73·7, range 19·6-116·8 μg/l). The two stimuli acted in a synergistic fashion in both groups of subjects. It may be hypothesized that hexarelin influences the GH inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids in humans, acting at the hypothalamic somatostatin level.

Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 146, 227–232

Restricted access