Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items for
- Author: A J Tilbrook x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by A. J. Tilbrook in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. M. de Kretser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I. J. Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
The roles of inhibin and testosterone in the negative feedback control of the secretion of FSH were explored in experiments using castrated rams administered human recombinant inhibin A (hr-inhibin) and testosterone propionate (TP). Two experiments were conducted in the non-breeding season. In experiment 1, two groups of long-term castrated rams (wethers) were treated with an i.v. injection of either vehicle or hr-inhibin in two doses (25 and 50 μg) given 2 weeks apart. Plasma concentrations of FSH, measured by radioimmunoassay, were suppressed significantly (P<0·01) and equally by both doses of hr-inhibin with a mean (± s.e.m.) maximal suppression of FSH of 19·9 ± 2·60% occurring 6–10 h after injection. In experiment 2, hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected (HPD) wethers given 125 ng gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) every 2 h, were treated with vehicle or 25 or 50 μg hr-inhibin before or after treatment (32 mg/day) with TP. A cross-over design was used so that each wether was treated with vehicle and hr-inhibin. Treatment with TP significantly (P<0·001) suppressed plasma concentrations of FSH by 56%. Both doses of hr-inhibin were similarly effective in significantly (P<0·05) suppressing plasma concentrations of FSH causing a mean suppression of 31·1 ± 5·60% 6–10 h after injection. The suppressive effect of hr-inhibin was significantly (P<0·05) increased when the wethers were treated with TP to a mean suppression of 50·7 ± 5·6% 6–10 h after injection. These data indicate that both inhibin and testosterone exert negative feedback control on FSH secretion in rams and that the suppressive effects of inhibin may be enhanced by testosterone. Furthermore, both inhibin and testosterone acted directly on the pituitary to suppress FSH secretion in rams. The inhibition of FSH by a direct pituitary action of testosterone in this study is at variance with our previous findings with HPD wethers during the breeding season when it was shown that testicular steroids have minimal feedback effects at this level. These discrepancies suggest that the sensitivity of the pituitary to negative feedback by testicular steroids may change with the breeding season independent of an input from the hypothalamus. Finally, the greater suppressive effects of hr-inhibin in HPD wethers in experiment 2 compared with the hypothalamo-pituitary intact wethers in experiment 1 suggests that the sensitivity of the pituitary to inhibin may be increased by limiting the GnRH stimulus to the pituitary.
Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 138, 181–189
Search for other papers by A. J. Tilbrook in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. M. de Kretser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I. J. Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
To determine whether Leydig cells produce inhibin in the ram, Leydig cells were stimulated by administering human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) or raising the levels of endogenous LH by an injection of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH). Plasma concentrations of testosterone increased in the 72 h after either a single injection (P < 0·05) or two injections (P < 0·01) of hCG. Plasma concentrations of inhibin were not significantly influenced by either one or two injections of hCG. Administration of GnRH (1 μg) caused an 11-fold increase in plasma concentrations of LH but did not influence concentrations of inhibin in either the jugular or testicular veins (pampiniform plexus). In contrast, concentrations of testosterone were increased by about fourfold in both jugular (P < 0·01) and testicular (P < 0·05) veins. The concentrations of inhibin in the testicular vein were 1·3-fold higher than in the peripheral plasma (P < 0·05) both before and following treatment with GnRH whereas the concentrations of testosterone were 18- to 21-fold greater than in peripheral concentrations.
In view of the difference in concentrations of inhibin between testicular and jugular veins, in a further experiment a sample was taken from the jugular vein, a vein located in the tunica vasculosa of the testis (testicular vein) and from a vein (spermatic vein) and lymph vessels located in the spermatic cord. The mean (± s.e.m.) concentrations of inhibin were highest in the testicular lymph (45·93±4·21 μg/l; P < 0·001) compared with the peripheral (4·14±0·31 μg/l), spermatic (8·0±1·17 μg/l) or testicular (6·4±0·82 μg/l) plasma. Plasma concentrations of inhibin were significantly higher in the spermatic vein than in the testicular vein (P < 0·05) and jugular vein (P < 0·01), and concentrations of inhibin in the testicular vein were significantly (P < 0·05) higher than in the jugular vein. There were no significant differences in the concentrations of testosterone in the spermatic vein, testicular vein or testicular lymph but the concentrations of testosterone in the peripheral plasma were significantly (P < 0·05) less than in the testicular plasma or lymph.
These results suggest that, in the ram, the Leydig cell does not respond to hCG or endogenous LH by secreting inhibin or by influencing other cells within the testis to secrete inhibin within the time-frame of these experiments. The low testicular to jugular differences in the concentration of inhibin and the high concentrations of inhibin in the testicular lymph suggest that the lymph may be an important route of secretion of inhibin from the testis in the ram.
Journal of Endocrinology (1991) 130, 107–114
Animal Production, School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Search for other papers by A I Turner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Animal Production, School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Search for other papers by B J Hosking in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Animal Production, School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Search for other papers by R A Parr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Animal Production, School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Search for other papers by A J Tilbrook in
Google Scholar
PubMed
It is important to understand factors that may influence responses to stress, as these factors may also influence vulnerability to pathologies that can develop when stress responses are excessive or prolonged. It is clear that, in adults, the sex of an individual can influence the cortisol response to stress in a stressor specific manner. Nevertheless, the stage of development at which these sex differences emerge is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that there are sex differences in the cortisol response to tail docking and ACTH in lambs of 1 and 8 weeks of age. We also established cortisol responses in males when tail docking was imposed alone and in combination with castration at these ages. In experiment 1, 1 and 8 week old male and female lambs were subjected to sham handling, tail docking or, in males, a combination of tail docking and castration. In experiment 2, we administered ACTH (1.0 IU/kg) to male and female lambs at 1 and 8 weeks of age. There were significant cortisol responses to all treatments at both ages. Sex differences in the cortisol responses to tail docking and ACTH developed between 1 and 8 weeks of age, with females having greater responses than males. The data suggest that the mechanism for the sex difference in response to tail docking may involve the adrenal glands. At both ages, in males, the cortisol response to the combined treatment of tail docking and castration was significantly greater than that for tail docking alone.
Search for other papers by D J Phillips in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M P Hedger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J R McFarlane in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Klein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I J Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A J Tilbrook in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A D Nash in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D M de Kretser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Plasma follistatin (FS) concentrations were determined after castration (n=5) or sham castration (n=4) of mature rams. Both treatments resulted in a prolonged increase in FS between 7 and 19 h after surgery, which returned to pretreatment concentrations by 24 h. Tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), a sensitive marker of an acute-phase response, was undetectable in plasma, indicating that the FS response was not induced by trauma due to surgery. In a second experiment, injection of castrated rams (n=4) with ovine recombinant interleukin-1β, an acute-phase mediator, resulted in a sustained rise in FS concentrations within 4 h of injection. Plasma TNF-α concentrations increased transiently within 1 h of interleukin-1β injection, indicating that an acute-phase response had been initiated. Plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations were significantly decreased at 8 and 24 h after interleukin-1β injection, strongly suggestive of an inhibitory effect of increased FS concentrations on the secretion of FSH. Injection of castrated rams (n=2) with a control preparation of recombinant interleukin-2 did not induce an acute-phase response, and plasma FS and FSH concentrations were unaffected. These data show that the testis is not a major source of circulating FS, that the increase in circulating FS following sham castration/castration is not due to an acute-phase response, but that conversely FS concentrations are modulated by the acute-phase mediator, interleukin-1β.
Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 151, 119–124
Search for other papers by A J Tilbrook in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D M de Kretser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F R Dunshea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Klein in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D M Robertson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by I J Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Maddocks in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine the plasma concentrations of follistatin in rams and to assess if the testis contributes to circulating follistatin and if there is uptake or production of follistatin by the head in rams. Catheters were inserted in the carotid artery, jugular vein and spermatic vein of intact rams during the non-breeding season (experiment 1; n=5) and breeding season (experiment 2; n=4). In experiment 1, blood samples were collected from 5 rams every 10 min for 4 h, commencing 20–60 min after surgery. After 2 h of sampling 1 μg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was injected intravenously. In experiment 2, blood samples were collected from 4 of the rams used in experiment 1 by venipuncture 30 and 15 min before surgery and every 15 min throughout surgery. Commencing 1 h after surgery, matched samples were taken from each of the vessels every 10 min for 4 h (1–4 h after surgery), then every hour for 20 h (4–24 h after surgery) and then every 10 min for 4 h (24–28 h after surgery). In both experiments, follistatin secretion was non-pulsatile and there were no significant differences between the concentrations of follistatin in any of the vessels. There was a significant (P<0·05) increase in the concentrations of follistatin in each of the vessels throughout the 4 h of 10-min sampling in both experiments. In experiment 2 plasma concentrations of follistatin in the jugular vein were significantly (P<0·05) lower before surgery than at other stages of the experiment. During the non-breeding season (experiment 1) the concentrations of follistatin in all vessels were about 2-fold higher (P<0·001) than during the breeding season (experiment 2). Concentrations of follistatin were measured in the testicular tissue of the ram, bull, monkey and rat and were found to be 13·6, 2·1, 2·5, 0·8 ng/g testis respectively. In experiment 3, blood samples were collected every 15 min for 4 h from castrated rams (n=6) in the absence of treatment with testosterone propionate (TP) and after 7 days of treatment with a physiological dose of TP during the breeding and non-breeding seasons. There was no effect of stage of breeding season or TP on the plasma concentrations of follistatin and these concentrations in the castrated rams were similar to the concentrations in the intact rams in experiment 2. In experiment 4, the function of Leydig cells was stimulated by administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin but this had no effect on plasma concentrations of follistatin.
These experiments show that the concentrations of follistatin in the plasma of rams are measurable, that the testis is not the major contributor to circulating follistatin and that there is no significant uptake or production of follistatin by the head in rams. It appears that the contribution of the testis to circulating follistatin may vary with the stage of the breeding season, being greater during the non-breeding season than the breeding season. The gonadotrophins and testosterone do not appear to have a direct effect on the secretion of follistatin in rams. The increase in concentrations of circulating follistatin during surgery and more frequent blood sampling suggest a stress-related effect on the production of follistatin.
Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 149, 55–63
Search for other papers by I. J. Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T. P. Fletcher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C. C. Pomares in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J. H. G. Holmes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Dunshea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. B. Thomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A. J. Tilbrook in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P. E. Walton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. B. Galloway in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
Three groups of mature rams were maintained on diets of hay, hay+2% lupin or hay+2% cowpea for 11 weeks. Serial blood samples were taken at 15-min intervals for 12 h for the determination of GH and IGF-I content by radioimmunoassay and for IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels by Western blotting. The rams were killed after 77 days of supplementary feeding and their pituitary glands analysed for content of GH and GH mRNA. Mean plasma GH and baseline GH levels were significantly (P<0·01) decreased in the rams fed lupin and cowpea compared with controls fed hay and GH pulse amplitude was significantly (P<0·001) decreased in the group fed the cowpea diet. The frequency of GH pulses was not significantly altered by either treatment. Plasma concentrations of IGF-I were elevated in rams fed lupin (P<0·001) or cowpea (P<0·05). IGFBP-3 levels were not significantly (P>0·05) altered by either treatment. There were no significant differences in pituitary content of GH mRNA but pituitary content of GH was increased in rams fed lupin (P<0·05) and cowpea (P=0·07). In conclusion, a high-protein diet decreases plasma GH levels and increases IGF-I without changing plasma IGFBP-3 levels in rams. Thus ongoing synthesis of GH, as indicated by the mRNA levels, may cause a build up of GH stores in the pituitary gland.
Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 138, 421–427