Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for
- Author: A Vinik x
- Refine by access: All content x
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Search for other papers by David A Taylor-Fishwick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Search for other papers by Wenjing Shi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Search for other papers by Gary L Pittenger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, USA
Search for other papers by Aaron I Vinik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Islet neogenesis associated protein (INGAP) promotes the generation of new islet mass in adult animal models. It is not understood what factors control the expression of INGAP. In this study, factors that regulate the expression of INGAP promoter activity are reported. To determine factors that regulate INGAP expression, we previously cloned the promoter region for INGAP. Analysis of the INGAP promoter suggested that candidate regulators of INGAP expression include the transcription factors PDX-1, NeuroD, PAN-1, STAT and AP-1. Using gene addition experiments in the 293 cell line the activity of these transcription factors on an INGAP-promoter construct linked to the β-galactosidase reporter has been determined. Induction of AP-1 activity or STAT activity using PMA or LIF stimulation respectively, or direct expression of PAN-1 specifically up-regulates INGAP promoter activity. In contrast, co-expression of PDX-1 but not NeuroD inhibits activation of the INGAP-promoter driven by PAN-1, PMA or LIF stimulation. PDX-1 binds directly to the INGAP promoter as determined in electromobility shift and antibody supershift assays. Expression of the INGAP-promoter-reporter construct in the HIT-T15 beta-cell line, a cell line that expresses endogenous PDX-1, did not reveal PMA-mediated stimulation of INGAP promoter activity. HIT-T15 cells however did efficiently transfect (> 68%) and respond (2-fold) to PMA-induced signal transduction to a transfected AP-1-CAT reporter. Partial reduction of PDX-1 expression in HIT-T15 cells was associated with recovery of PMA induced INGAP promoter activity. These data suggest that expression of PDX-1 is associated with a repression of stimulus-induced INGAP promoter activity that appears to be mediated by a direct DNA interaction. These findings implicate PDX-1 in a possible feedback loop to block unbridled islet expansion.
Search for other papers by H Del Zotto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Massa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Rafaeloff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by GL Pittenger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Vinik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Gold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Reifel-Miller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by JJ Gagliardino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The possible relationship between changes in islet cell mass and in islet neogenesis-associated protein (INGAP)-cell mass induced by sucrose administration to normal hamsters was investigated. Normal hamsters were given sucrose (10% in drinking water) for 5 (S8) or 21 (S24) weeks and compared with control (C) fed hamsters. Serum glucose and insulin levels were measured and quantitative immunocytochemistry of the endocrine pancreas was performed. Serum glucose levels were comparable among the groups, while insulin levels were higher in S hamsters. There was a significant increase in beta-cell mass (P<0.02) and in beta-cell 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine index (P<0.01), and a significant decrease in islet volume (P<0.01) only in S8 vs C8 hamsters. Cytokeratin (CK)-labelled cells were detected only in S8 hamsters. INGAP-positive cell mass was significantly larger only in S8 vs C8 hamsters. Endocrine INGAP-positive cells were located at the islet periphery ( approximately 96%), spread within the exocrine pancreas ( approximately 3%), and in ductal cells (<1%) in all groups. INGAP positivity and glucagon co-localization varied according to topographic location and type of treatment. In C8 hamsters, 49.1+/-6. 9% cells were INGAP- and glucagon-positive in the islets, while this percentage decreased by almost half in endocrine extra-insular and ductal cells. In S8 animals, co-expression increased in endocrine extra-insular cells to 36.3+/-9.5%, with similar figures in the islets, decreasing to 19.7+/-6.9% in ductal cells. INGAP-positive cells located at the islet periphery also co-expressed CK. In conclusion, a significant increase of INGAP-positive cell mass was only observed at 8 weeks when neogenesis was present, suggesting that this peptide might participate in the control of islet neogenesis. Thus, INGAP could be a potentially useful tool to treat conditions in which there is a decrease in beta-cell mass.
Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Search for other papers by E Bucris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Beck in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Boura-Halfon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Isaac in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y Vinik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Rosenzweig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Search for other papers by S R Sampson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y Zick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Insulin resistance results from impaired insulin signaling in target tissues that leads to increased levels of insulin required to control plasma glucose levels. The cycle of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia eventually leads to pancreatic cell deterioration and death by a mechanism that is yet unclear. Insulin induces ROS formation in several cell types. Furthermore, death of pancreatic cells induced by oxidative stress could be potentiated by insulin. Here, we investigated the mechanism underlying this phenomenon. Experiments were done on pancreatic cell lines (Min-6, RINm, INS-1), isolated mouse and human islets, and on cell lines derived from nonpancreatic sources. Insulin (100nM) for 24h selectively increased the production of ROS in pancreatic cells and isolated pancreatic islets, but only slightly affected the expression of antioxidant enzymes. This was accompanied by a time- and dose-dependent decrease in cellular reducing power of pancreatic cells induced by insulin and altered expression of several ER stress response elements including a significant increase in Trb3 and a slight increase in iNos. The effect on iNos did not increase NO levels. Insulin also potentiated the decrease in cellular reducing power induced by H2O2 but not cytokines. Insulin decreased the expression of MCL-1, an antiapoptotic protein of the BCL family, and induced a modest yet significant increase in caspase 3/7 activity. In accord with these findings, inhibition of caspase activity eliminated the ability of insulin to increase cell death. We conclude that prolonged elevated levels of insulin may prime apoptosis and cell death-inducing mechanisms as a result of oxidative stress in pancreatic cells.
Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology,
Anatomy and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Norfolk, 23510 Virginia, USA
NIDDK, NIH, DHHS, Mark O Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Room 5-5940, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Search for other papers by David A Taylor-Fishwick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology,
Anatomy and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Norfolk, 23510 Virginia, USA
NIDDK, NIH, DHHS, Mark O Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Room 5-5940, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Search for other papers by Angela Bowman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology,
Anatomy and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Norfolk, 23510 Virginia, USA
NIDDK, NIH, DHHS, Mark O Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Room 5-5940, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Search for other papers by Natasha Hamblet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology,
Anatomy and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Norfolk, 23510 Virginia, USA
NIDDK, NIH, DHHS, Mark O Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Room 5-5940, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Search for other papers by Paul Bernard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology,
Anatomy and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Norfolk, 23510 Virginia, USA
NIDDK, NIH, DHHS, Mark O Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Room 5-5940, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Search for other papers by David M Harlan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology,
Anatomy and Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Norfolk, 23510 Virginia, USA
NIDDK, NIH, DHHS, Mark O Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Room 5-5940, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Search for other papers by Aaron I Vinik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Islet neogenesis associated protein (INGAP) is a protein factor that can stimulate new islet mass from adult pancreatic progenitor cells. In models of islet neogenesis, INGAP expression is elevated in pancreatic acinar cells. Using a transgenic model to drive a sustained expression of INGAP in pancreatic acinar cells, we have identified a protection to chemical-induced hyperglycemia. A sustained expression of INGAP during development did not perturb islet development or basal blood glucose homeostasis, although β-cell mass and pancreatic insulin content were significantly increased in the INGAP transgenic mice. When challenged with a diabetogenic dose of streptozotocin (STZ), mice carrying the INGAP transgene did not become hyperglycemic. In contrast, wild-type mice became and remained hyperglycemic, blood glucose > 550 mg/dl. The serum insulin levels and islet morphology were preserved in the transgenic mice after STZ treatment. These data suggest that the sustained expression of INGAP in the acinar pancreas confers resistance to a diabetogenic insult. The INGAP transgenic mouse provides a new model to uncover factors that are protective to diabetes onset and biomarkers to track β-cell pathology.