Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for
- Author: E Ramos x
- Refine by access: All content x
London Regional Cancer Program, Biochemistry, 790 Commissioners Road, Room A4-921, London, Ontario, N6A 4L6 Canada Departments of
Search for other papers by Sanda Raulic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yudith Ramos-Valdes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
London Regional Cancer Program, Biochemistry, 790 Commissioners Road, Room A4-921, London, Ontario, N6A 4L6 Canada Departments of
London Regional Cancer Program, Biochemistry, 790 Commissioners Road, Room A4-921, London, Ontario, N6A 4L6 Canada Departments of
Search for other papers by Gabriel E DiMattia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Stanniocalcin 1 (STC1) and STC2 are secreted, homodimeric glycoproteins that share 30% amino acid sequence identity. Breast tumour gene profiling studies have demonstrated significantly upregulated STC2 expression in hormone-responsive positive breast tumours; therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate STC2 hormonal regulation and function in breast cancer cells. Here we report that STC2 is expressed in a number of human breast cancer cell lines, regardless of their oestrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) receptor status, and its expression is readily detectable in human and mouse mammary gland tumours. Besides E2, retinoic acid (RA) and P4 play an important role in the regulation of STC2 expression, not only in MCF-7 but also in other breast cancer and non-breast cell lines. The expression of the related hormone, STC1, is not affected by the above hormones in breast and endometrial cancer cell lines implying a fundamental difference in regulation in cancer cell lines. The induction of STC2 expression by E2 and RA occurs at the transcriptional level but through intermediary transcription factors. The STC2 proximal promoter region is not responsible for hormonal induction, but exhibits a high basal transcriptional activity. Constitutive STC2 expression in human breast cancer cell lines resulted in significant impairment of cell growth, migration and cell viability after serum withdrawal. In conclusion, STC2 is a downstream target of E2, P4 and RA signalling pathways. In hormone receptor negative cell lines it can function in a paracrine/autocrine fashion to reduce cell proliferation.
Search for other papers by V Sánchez-Margalet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Ramos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Mateo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Oliván in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Pérez-Cano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Goberna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Pancreastatin is a regulatory peptide known to inhibit insulin secretion and insulin action with a glycogenolytic effect in the liver. This peptide is present in and secreted by many endocrine and chromaffin cells. Abnormalities of glucose, insulin and lipoprotein metabolism are common in patients with hypertension, as well as their first-degree relatives. We have recently studied a group of non-obese hypertensive subjects in which pancreastatin-like levels were increased compared with controls, and correlated with norepinephrine levels. We hypothesized that pancreastatin alongside the sympathoadrenal system might have a part in the insulin resistance of these patients, and this metabolic syndrome could play a role in the pathogenesis and complications of hypertension. In this article, we studied the normotensive offspring of these non-obese hypertensive patients and looked for metabolic abnormalities as well as plasma pancreastatin, glucagon and catecholamine levels. The subjects were separated into two groups: (1) offspring from non-insulin-resistant patients and (2) offspring from insulin-resistant patients. We found that after an intravenous glucose load, offspring from insulin-resistant patients were already hyperinsulinemic, although glucose clearance was normal, suggesting an early alteration in insulin sensitivity, whereas pancreastatin and catecholamine levels were normal compared with matched controls. However, offspring from non-insulin-resistant patients had no differences with controls. These results suggest that pancreastatin and catecholamines may not play an important role in triggering insulin resistance, although they may be important once the syndrome is established.
Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 153, 313–318
Search for other papers by J Varayoud in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J G Ramos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L Monje in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Bosquiazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Muñoz-de-Toro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E H Luque in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The gene for estrogen receptor α (ERα) has been shown to be under complex hormonal control and its activity can be regulated by mRNA alternative splicing. Here we examined the regulation of ERα transcription and translation in the rat uterus by ovarian steroid hormones. We examined whether expression of ERα mRNA splice isoforms is hormonally regulated in ovariectomized (OVX) and cycling rats. Adult OVX female rats were treated daily with 17-β estradiol (E2) (0.05 μg/rat or 5 μg/rat), progesterone (P4) (1 mg/rat) or a combination of both hormones for 4 days. Animals were killed 24 h after the last injection and uterine horns were removed. In order to determine whether ERα mRNA isoforms are differentially expressed under various physiological conditions, animals were evaluated at proestrus, estrus and diestrus. The ERα protein and mRNA were detected by immunohistochemistry and comparative RT-PCR analysis respectively. The presence of ERα mRNA isoforms was evaluated using a nested RT-PCR assay. In OVX control rats, ERα mRNA and protein levels were high, demonstrating a constitutive expression of the ERα gene in the uterus. When animals received P4 or the high dose of E2, a significant decrease in both ERα mRNA and protein was observed in the uterus. However, when rats were protein was treated with the low dose of E2, only the ERα down-regulated; no changes were observed in ERα mRNA expression. In addition to the full-length ERα mRNA, OVX control rat uteri expressed three shorter transcripts: Σ3, Σ4 and Σ3,4 (lacking exon 3, exon 4, or both 3 and 4 respectively). Surprisingly, when OVX animals were treated with P4, the low dose of E2 or a combination of both steroids, expression of the Σ3 isoform was completely abolished. During the estrous cycle, all ERα mRNA splicing variants were detected at proestrus and estrus. However, in diestrus, significant low levels of the Σ3 isoform were observed. In summary, our results suggest a dose-dependent relationship between E2 concentrations and the level of control in the ERα transcription–translation cascade. Moreover, the alternative splicing of the ERα primary transcript is influenced by the hormonal milieu, suggesting that these events could affect the estrogen responsiveness of the rat uterus during the estrous cycle.