Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for
- Author: G Voorhout x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by H S Kooistra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Voorhout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J A Mol in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Rijnberk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Under the assumption that the impaired inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on cell division is an important determinant in the progression of corticotrophic adenomas, it is postulated that the magnitude of proliferation and the resistance to glucocorticoids are correlated. To test this hypothesis, 67 dogs with pituitary-dependent hyperadrenocorticism were studied to determine whether a correlation could be demonstrated between the effect of dexamethasone administration on the activity of the pituitary–adrenocortical axis and the size of the pituitary gland as estimated by computed tomography.
The volumes of the pituitary glands as calculated from summations of subsequent images of pituitary areas, ranged from 11·8 to 3238·6 mm3. Among the three dimensions, the height of the pituitary was the most sensitive indicator of enlargement. Calculation of the pituitary height/brain area ratio (P/B ratio) allowed correction for the size of the dog. The P/B ratio had the highest discriminatory power in distinguishing enlarged (n=41) from non-enlarged (n=26) pituitaries.
The effects of dexamethasone (0·1 mg/kg) on the plasma concentrations of cortisol and ACTH and on the urinary corticoid/creatinine (C/C) ratios were expressed as percentage changes from the initial values. For ACTH, cortisol and C/C ratios these figures for resistance to dexamethasone were significantly correlated with the dimensions of the pituitary, particularly the height, volume and P/B ratio.
It is concluded that the magnitude of the expansion of pituitary corticotrophic adenomas is dependent upon the loss of restraint by glucocorticoids, i.e. the degree of insensitivity to glucocorticoid feedback.
Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 152, 387–394
