Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 10 of 14 items for
- Author: G. F. Weinbauer x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by G. R. Marshall in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Bint Akhtar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
If the suppressive effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on gonadotrophin secretion are mediated through GnRH-receptor occupancy alone, it should be possible to restore serum gonadotrophin levels by displacing the antagonist with exogenous GnRH. To test this hypothesis, eight adult crab-eating macaques (Macaca fascicularis), weight 4·7–7·6 kg, were subjected to the following treatment regimens. A GnRH-stimulation test was performed before and 4, 12 and 24 h after a single s.c. injection of the GnRH antagonist (N-Ac-d-p-Cl-Phe1,2,d-Trp3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10)-GnRH (ORG 30276). The stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5·0 or 50 μg GnRH given as a single i.v. bolus. Blood was taken before and 15, 30 and 60 min after each bolus for analysis of bioactive LH and testosterone. The GnRH-challenging doses were given as follows: 0·5 μg GnRH was injected at 0 and 4 h, followed by 5·0 μg after 12 h and 50 μg after 24 h. One week later, 5·0 μg GnRH were given at 0 and 4 h, followed by 50 μg after 12 h and 0·5 μg after 24 h. Finally, after another week, the GnRH challenges began with 50 μg at 0 and 4 h, followed by 0·5 μg at 12 h and 5·0 μg at 24 h. This design permitted comparison of the LH and testosterone responses with respect to the dose of GnRH and the time after administration of GnRH antagonist. The areas under the response curves were measured and statistical evaluation was carried out by means of non-parametric two-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons of Wilcoxon and Wilcox. Four hours after the antagonist was injected, the LH and testosterone responses to all three doses of GnRH were suppressed. At the lowest dose of GnRH (0·5 μg) the responses remained reduced even after 24 h, whereas the higher doses of GnRH elicited an LH and testosterone response at 12 and 24 h which was not significantly different from that at 0 h. These data demonstrate that the suppression of LH secretion by a GnRH antagonist in vivo can be overcome by exogenously administered GnRH in a dose- and time-dependent manner, thus strongly supporting the contention that GnRH antagonists prevent gonadotrophin secretion by GnRH-receptor occupancy.
J. Endocr. (1986) 110, 145–150
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P. Hankel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
We reported previously that after a single injection of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to male monkeys, exogenous GnRH stimulated LH secretion in a time- and dose-dependent manner, indicating that GnRH antagonist-induced blockade of LH secretion resulted from pituitary GnRH receptor occupancy. The present study was performed to investigate whether GnRH can also restore a blockade of LH and testosterone secretion during chronic GnRH antagonist administration. Four adult male cynomolgus monkeys (Macacafascicularis) received daily s.c. injections of the GnRH antagonist [N-Ac-d-pCl-Phe1,2,d-TRP3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10]-GnRH (ORG 30276) at a dose of 1400–1600 μg/kg for 8 weeks. Before the GnRH antagonist was given and during weeks 3 and 8 of treatment, pituitary stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5, 50 and 500 μg synthetic GnRH, administered in increasing order at intervals of 24 h. At 8 weeks, a dose of 1000 μg GnRH was also given. All doses of GnRH significantly (P < 0·05) stimulated serum concentrations of bioactive LH (3- to 8-fold) and testosterone (2·6- to 3·8-fold) before the initiation of GnRH antagonist treatment. After 3 weeks of GnRH antagonist treatment, only 50 and 500 μg GnRH doses were able to increase LH and testosterone secretion. Release of LH was significantly (P < 0·05) more elevated with 500 μg compared with 50 μg GnRH. After 8 weeks, only the highest dose of 1000 μg elicited a significant (P < 0·05) rise in LH secretion. Basal hormone levels just before the bolus injection of GnRH were similar (P > 0·10–0·80). This finding eliminated the possibility that the increasing doses of GnRH had primed the pituitary thereby resulting in higher stimulatory effects of the larger doses of GnRH.
In conclusion, the present data indicate that, even after prolonged exposure to a GnRH antagonist, the pituitary retains some degree of responsiveness to GnRH. This observation supports the view that the inhibitory effects of chronic GnRH antagonist treatment are also mediated, at least in part, by occupancy of the pituitary GnRH receptor rather than by receptor down-regulation.
Journal of Endocrinology (1992) 133, 439–445
Search for other papers by S. Khurshid in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
The aim of the present investigation was to investigate the effects of testosterone on basal and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-stimulated gonadotrophin secretion in the presence and absence of a GnRH antagonist in a non-human primate model (Macaca fascicularis). Orchidectomized animals were used in order to avoid interference by testicular products other than testosterone involved in gonadotrophin feedback. Concomitant and delayed administration of testosterone at doses that provided serum levels either within the intact range (study 1) or markedly above that range (study 2) did not influence the suppression of basal gonadotrophin release induced by the GnRH antagonist during a 15-day period. To assess the possible effects of testosterone treatment at the pituitary level (study 3) GnRH stimulation tests (500 μg) were performed before and on days 8 and 15 of treatment with high-dose testosterone and GnRH antagonist alone or in combination. Testosterone alone abolished the gonadotrophin responses to exogenous GnRH observed under pretreatment conditions. With GnRH antagonist alone, an increased responsiveness (P <0·05) to GnRH was seen on day 8 and a similar response compared with pretreatment on day 15. Following combined treatment with GnRH antagonist and testosterone, GnRH-induced gonadotrophin secretion was consistently lower compared with that after GnRH antagonist alone (P <0·05), but was increased compared with that after testosterone alone (P<0·05). Thus, in the presence of a GnRH antagonist the feedback action of testosterone on LH and FSH was diminished. The present work in GnRH antagonist-treated orchidectomized monkeys demonstrates that (I) unlike in rats, testosterone fails to stimulate FSH secretion selectively, (II) the negative feedback action of testosterone on GnRH-stimulated LH and FSH secretion is altered in the presence of a GnRH antagonist and (III) GnRH antagonists induce a transient period of increased responsiveness of gonadotrophic hormone release to exogenous GnRH. The observation that a GnRH antagonist reduced the feedback effects of testosterone suggests that testosterone action on pituitary gonadotrophin release, at least in part, is mediated via hypothalamic GnRH.
Journal of Endocrinology (1991) 129, 363–370
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F. Drobnitzky in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. M. Galhotra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
Intratesticular injection of glycerol (1,2,3-trihydroxypropane) was evaluated as an experimental approach for studying the relationship between spermatogenic activity, i.e. relative proportion of euspermatogenic and aspermatogenic tubules in the testis, and serum concentrations of FSH. Adult rats received a single intratesticular injection of either 400 μl distilled water or five different doses of glycerol, ranging from 25 to 400 μl, and were killed after 1 or 4 weeks respectively. Injection of glycerol caused focal destruction, so that the same testes contained intact tubules, tubules with spermatogonia and Sertoli cells only, and tubules devoid of cellular material. There was a close correlation (r=−0·896) between the frequency of intact tubules and the dose of glycerol, and a similarly strong correlation (r= −0·908) between acellular tubules and the dose of glycerol. A correlation existed between FSH and euspermatogenic tubules (r= −0·758, n=122) and, conversely, between FSH and acellular tubules (r=0·820, n=122), while the correlation for tubules containing spermatogonia and Sertoli cells was only marginal (r=− 0·055). The exact relationship between FSH and spermatogenic activity in the testis was used to estimate the minimal amount of spermatogenic tissue necessary for maintaining normal serum concentrations of FSH. Only the disruption of spermatogenesis in more than 30% of seminiferous tubules in each testis caused increased serum concentrations of FSH. Serum concentrations of FSH reached the range found in castrated rats when less than 1 % of tubules were intact.
These findings demonstrate (1) that a single intratesticular injection of glycerol is suitable for the study of the relationship between spermatogenic activity in the testis and FSH and (2) that a quantitative relationship exists between the extent of spermatogenic damage and serum concentrations of FSH. The observation that, in the rat, serum FSH has a diagnostic value for the extent of spermatogenic damage may be of importance for clinical evalution of testicular disorders.
J. Endocr. (1987) 115, 83–90
Search for other papers by F. Bint Akhtar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
The effects of a potent gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, (N-Ac-d-p-Cl-Phe1,2,d-Trp3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10)-GnRH (Org 30276), on pituitary and testicular function of adult macaque monkeys were investigated. After a study to find the correct dose in castrated monkeys, five intact adult male animals were treated with daily s.c. injections of 5 mg antagonist for 9 weeks. The treatment resulted in an immediate decline in serum LH and testosterone in three out of five animals. The two hormones remained suppressed during the 9-week treatment period. Testosterone and LH responses to a bolus injection of GnRH (50 μg i.v.) were blunted or abolished during the antagonist treatment. Testicular volumes decreased markedly and ejaculates obtained at the end of treatment were azoospermic or contained only few dead sperm. Histological examination of the testes showed complete disruption of seminiferous epithelium in these animals. A decrease of body weight was observed in the treated animals. When the treatment was ceased, all inhibitory effects of GnRH antagonists were reversible. In the other two animals no consistent suppression of pituitary or testicular function could be observed during this period, nor was a doubling of the treatment dose for a further 8 weeks capable of fully suppressing endocrine and seminal parameters in these monkeys.
It is concluded that GnRH antagonist treatment is capable of rapidly decreasing serum LH and testosterone and disrupting spermatogenesis in this primate species. Suppression effected by antagonist treatment is more rapid than that caused by GnRH agonists. The individual responses to the tested doses, however, vary markedly.
J. Endocr. (1985) 104, 345–354
Search for other papers by G F Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Simoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J S Hutchison in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
A dose-finding study was performed in adult male monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a recombinant human FSH preparation (rhFSH). Groups of five monkeys were randomly assigned to receive single i.m. injections of 0·9% (w/v) NaCl (diluent), 6, 12 or 24 IU rhFSH/kg or 24 IU urinary human FSH/kg (uhFSH). The doses were based on an in vivo ovarian weight gain assay. Blood samples were collected 24 h before and immediately prior to injections, and 4, 8, 12, 24, 72 and 96 h after injections for determination of serum levels of immunoactive FSH by fluoroimmunoassay, bioactive FSH by an in vitro Sertoli cell assay, and inhibin and testosterone by radioimmunoassay. Inhibin was chosen as a marker for in vivo hFSH activity, since the secretion of inhibin in male monkeys is under the control of FSH. Administration of hFSH resulted in dose-related increases in serum hFSH concentrations. rhFSH and uhFSH exhibited similar pharmacokinetics. Comparable findings were obtained when serum samples were analysed for in vitro FSH bioactivity. Maximum serum hFSH levels were obtained 4–6 h after administration and the elimination half-life of hFSH was on average 18–22 h. The serum pharmacokinetics of rhFSH were linear within the dose range explored. Baseline inhibin concentrations varied significantly between groups. However, when the changes in inhibin concentrations were normalized to the baseline values (per cent change, area under curve and maximum inhibin level), a dose-dependent stimulatory effect of rhFSH on serum inhibin was evident. This effect attained statistical significance with doses of 24 IU rhFSH/kg and 24 IU uhFSH/kg, and the serum inhibin responses to rhFSH and uhFSH were not significantly different. No significant differences were observed with regard to the serum concentrations of testosterone between the diluentand hFSH-treated groups. It was concluded that rhFSH is bioactive in terms of stimulating testicular inhibin production in the male monkey and that the pharmacokinetic properties of rhFSH and uhFSH are similar.
Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 141, 113–121
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Khurshid in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by U. Fingscheidt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
Since the concomitant administration of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and testosterone suppresses sperm production only incompletely, the feasibility of treatment with a GnRH antagonist and delayed testosterone supplementation for sustained suppression of sperm production in a non-human primate model was investigated. Adult cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis; five/group) received daily s.c. injections of the GnRH antagonist [N-acetyl-d-2-naphthyl-Ala1,d-4-chloro-Phe2,d-pyridyl-Ala3,nicotinyl-Lys5,d- nicotinyl - Lys6, isopropyl-Lys8,d-Ala10]-GnRH of either 450 or 900 μg/kg for 18 weeks. During week 6 of the GnRH antagonist treatment, all monkeys were given a single i.m. injection of 40 mg of a long-acting testosterone ester (testosterone-trans-4-n-butylcyclo-hexanecarboxylate; 20-Aet-1). Within 1 week, serum LH bioactivity was suppressed in both groups and remained low throughout the entire treatment period. Similarly, concentrations of serum testosterone declined precipitously. During week 6, substitution with testosterone restored concentrations of serum testosterone into the pretreatment range. Concentrations of serum inhibin declined within 1 week and remained suppressed during the period of treatment with the GnRH antagonist. Testicular volumes were reduced to approximately 25% of pretreatment values in both groups by week 8 and stayed in that range during the remaining period of administration of the GnRH antagonist. During the first 6 weeks of administration of the GnRH antagonist, the ejaculatory response to electrostimulation and the volume of the ejaculates diminished with time. Supplementation with testosterone during week 6 restored the ejaculatory responses within 2–3 weeks. From week 9 of GnRH antagonist treatment onwards, all monkeys given 450 μg/kg and four monkeys given 900 μg/kg produced azoospermic ejaculates. The fifth animal in the latter group became azoospermic during week 13. Azoospermia persisted throughout the entire period of treatment with the GnRH antagonist and for a further 7–13 weeks. All suppressive effects of administration of GnRH antagonist were reversible. During the recovery phase the increase in testicular volumes paralleled an increase in concentrations of serum inhibin. The suppression of inhibin levels during the period of administration of testosterone indicates that Sertoli cell activity was not restimulated by testosterone. In conclusion, GnRH antagonist treatment with delayed supplementation with testosterone might serve as a model for further research towards the development of an endocrine male contraceptive. The recovery pattern of serum levels of inhibin suggests that inhibin could serve as a marker for Sertoli cell activity.
Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 123, 303–310
Search for other papers by J. M. S. Bartlett in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
Synchronization of spermatogenesis would provide an ideal model for the investigation of stage-dependent changes in the secretion of paracrine factors. In vitamin A-deficient animals subsequently injected with vitamin A, over 80% of seminiferous tubules were synchronized within three to five stages of the seminiferous cycle. Following replenishment of vitamin A, spermatogenic stages IV–VI (35 days), VI–VIII (38 days), IX–XII (41 days), I–IV (45 days) and V–VII (48 days) were observed. Despite synchronization of spermatogenesis at all stages, spermatogenesis was markedly impaired when evaluated in a quantitative fashion. At all times evaluated, numbers of round spermatids were reduced compared with age-matched controls. Numbers of pachytene spermatocytes reached control values only after 45 days of vitamin A replenishment. Elongate spermatids were almost totally absent up to 41 days after vitamin A replenishment. Testicular and epididymal weights were also reduced, although testicular weights showed a significant recovery over the time-course of the study. Serum and pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH were raised at the commencement of the study, with serum gonadotrophins returning to control values 48 days after vitamin A replenishment. Both testicular and serum testosterone concentrations in treated animals tended to be higher than in the controls.
Although synchronization of spermatogenesis was achieved, testicular testosterone concentrations did not reflect the stage-dependent cyclical changes observed in earlier studies. Testicular concentrations of testosterone were raised throughout the period of observation with the exception of animals synchronized around stages II–IV of the spermatogenic cycle. No correlation between the most frequent stages and intratesticular testosterone was found (r = 0·06, P > 0·1). Previous observations that testosterone concentrations are selectively increased at stages VII–VIII of the spermatogenic cycle are not supported by the present study.
Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 123, 403–412
Search for other papers by J. M. S. Bartlett in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G. F. Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E. Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
In order to clarify further the role of FSH in the maintenance of spermatogenesis, adult rats were treated with purified human FSH (2 × 5 IU/day per rat), testosterone (1·5 cm silicone elastomer implant) or a combination of both hormones for 2 weeks following hypophysectomy.
After hypophysectomy alone, no elongate spermatids were observed and the numbers of pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids observed were reduced when compared with untreated controls. Testosterone supplementation alone qualitatively maintained the formation of elongate spermatids in most seminiferous tubules, whilst in FSH-treated rats increased numbers of round spermatids and pachytene spermatocytes were observed when compared with hypophysectomized animals. Formation of elongate spermatids, however, did not occur under FSH treatment alone. A combination of FSH and testosterone treatment maintained spermatogenesis in an almost quantitative fashion. Numbers of pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids were maintained at about 80% of levels seen in intact control animals. Treatment with FSH or testosterone alone maintained testis weights at significantly higher levels than those seen in hypophysectomized controls (FSH, 0·79 ± 0·05 g; testosterone, 0·81 ± 0·07 g; hypophysectomized, 0·50 ± 0·04 g). Animals treated with FSH and testosterone showed testis weights 20% below control values (1·22 ± 0·05 vs 1·51 ± 0·06 g; P <0·05). No increases in intratesticular or intratubular androgen concentrations or in testosterone: dihydrotestosterone ratios were observed in any of the hormone-treated groups when compared with hypophysectomized controls. In all hypophysectomized animals testicular androgen concentrations were reduced to <5% of control values.
The results obtained in this study suggest that FSH is involved in the maintenance of spermatogenesis in the adult rat and that the effects of FSH are not mediated through changes in intratesticular androgens. Low levels of testosterone in combination with FSH can almost quantitatively maintain spermatogenesis in adult rats.
Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 121, 49–58
Search for other papers by G F Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Limberger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H M Behre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The combination of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and delayed testosterone substitution provides a promising approach towards male contraception. However, the GnRH antagonists used clinically so far cause side-effects and have to be administered continuously. We therefore used the non-human primate model to see whether the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (which exhibits a favourable benefit-to-risk ratio in terms of anti-gonadotrophic action in normal men) induces complete and reversible suppression of spermatogenesis and whether GnRH antagonist-induced suppression of spermatogenesis can be maintained by testosterone alone.
Four groups of adult cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis; five per group) were injected daily with 450 μg cetrorelix/kg ([N-acetyl-d-2-naphthyl-Ala1, d-4-chloro-Phe2, d-pyridyl-Ala3, d-Cit6, d-Ala10]-GnRH). Group 1 received the GnRH antagonist for 7 weeks followed by vehicle administration for another 11 weeks; group 2 was treated with GnRH antagonist for the entire 18 weeks with each animal receiving a single testosterone implant during weeks 11–18 to restore the ejaculatory response to electrostimulation; group 3 received the GnRH antagonist for 18 weeks and testosterone buciclate (TB) was injected during week 6 of GnRH antagonist treatment; group 4 was subjected to GnRH antagonist administration for 7 weeks and received TB (200 mg/animal) during week 6.
Under GnRH antagonist treatment alone serum concentrations of testosterone were suppressed. TB maintained testosterone levels two- to fourfold above baseline levels in groups 3 and 4 and prevented the recovery of LH secretion for about 20 weeks after GnRH antagonist withdrawal, whereas inhibin levels increased significantly from week 8 onwards. Group 2 animals were azoospermic during weeks 12–18 of GnRH antagonist administration. The TB-replaced groups developed azoospermia or became severely oligozoospermic. Quantitation of cell numbers by flow cytometry during weeks 6 and 18 revealed that TB (groups 3 and 4) had prevented a further decline of germ cell production compared with group 2 but had maintained the spermatogenic status present at week 6 (onset of TB substitution). All inhibitory effects of cetrorelix and/or TB were reversible after cessation of treatment.
These findings demonstrate that cetrorelix reversibly inhibits spermatogenesis in a non-human primate model. Although TB maintained the GnRH antagonist-induced suppression of spermatogenesis, azoospermia was not achieved. This latter effect may reflect either a direct spermatogenesis-supporting effect of the high dose of TB or the partial recovery of inhibin secretion (indirectly reflecting FSH secretion) or a combination of both. Thus, maintenance of GnRH antagonist-induced spermatogenic inhibition by testosterone alone appears theoretically possible. Whether this regimen will, however, permit the induction of sustained azoospermia remains to be seen, preferably in human studies.
Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 142, 485–495