Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for
- Author: H Aslam x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by H Aslam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Rosiepen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Krishnamurthy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Arslan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Clemen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Nieschlag in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by GF Weinbauer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Although the gonadotropic control of the spermatogenic process is well established, the endocrine regulation of the timing and kinetics of germ cell development has received little attention. We found previously that the administration of a GnRH antagonist (ANT) over a period of 25 days could retard spermatid development and slightly prolong cycle length in intact adult cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of extended exposure to ANT on the duration of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the monkey. Additionally, the duration of spermatogenesis was studied in the ANT-exposed rat model. In experiment 1, monkeys were given either saline or ANT (n=6/group) and on day 30 all animals received a single injection of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) to label S-phase germ cells. Testicular biopsies were taken on days 39, 43, 47 and 51 (end of treatment) for BrdU localization and flow cytometric analysis. ANT treatment suppressed hormone levels, reduced testis size by >70% and severely impaired germ cell production. Despite these alterations, cycle duration remained unchanged at all time-points compared with controls (10.12+/-0.15 days vs 10.16+/- 0.44 days). In experiment 2, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=15/group) received either vehicle (VEH) or ANT for 14 days and received BrdU injection on day 2. Cycle duration was found to be shorter in the ANT-treated group (12.45+/-0.09 days) than in the control group (12.75+/-0.08, P<0.05). As spermatogenic cycle length in this control group was longer than that of our historical controls (range: 12.37-12.53 days), experiment 2 was repeated (n=10/group). In experiment 3, cycle duration was 12.51+/-0.02 for VEH and 12.46+/-0.05 for the ANT-treated group (P>0.05) in both species. We concluded that the duration of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in monkeys and rats is independent of gonadotropins but is rather regulated by the spermatogenic tissue itself.
Search for other papers by J. P. H. Wilding in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. G. Gilbey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Mannan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N. Aslam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. A. Ghatei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. R. Bloom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is the most powerful appetite stimulant known, and chronic administration leads to obesity. The hypothalamic content of NPY varies with nutritional status, suggesting that it is of physiological importance. We measured NPY in specific hypothalamic nuclei and NPY mRNA in the hypothalamus by Northern blotting in rats made obese by feeding a highly palatable diet compared with controls fed standard chow. In animals fed the palatable diet, NPY concentrations were increased in the paraventricular nucleus (mean ± s.e.m.; 19·5 ± 2·3 vs 11·1 ± 1·1 fmol/μg protein, P < 0·02), the arcuate nucleus (20·4 ± 3·3 vs 9·3 ± 0·6 fmol/μg protein, P < 0·01), the medial preoptic area (9·1 ± 0·9 vs 5·9 ± 0·7 fmol/μg protein, P < 0·02) and the anterior hypothalamus (2·7 ± 0·2 vs 2·0 ± 0·1 fmol/μg, P < 0·02). Hypothalamic NPY mRNA measured by Northern blot analysis was, however, unchanged. These results suggest that the increase in NPY was due to decreased release rather than increased NPYergic activity. The findings are in accord with the neuroendocrine disturbance and increased thermogenesis observed in this model of obesity.
Journal of Endocrinology (1992) 132, 299–304