Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for
- Author: M. J. Cronin x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by M. J. Cronin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. A. Keefer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C. A. Valdenegro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by L. G. Dabney in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R. M. MacLeod in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The MtTW15 transplantable pituitary tumour grown in rats was tested in vitro for the ability of dopamine agonists to affect prolactin secretion and for the existence of dopamine receptors. Prolactin release from enzymatically dispersed cells and non-enzymatically treated tissue fragments of both the tumour and the anterior pituitary gland was determined in a cell perifusion column apparatus. Dopamine (0·1–5 μmol/l), bromocriptine (50 nmol/l) and the dopamine antagonist haloperidol (100 nmol/l) had no effect on prolactin release from the tumour cells. In contrast, dopamine (500 nmol/l) inhibited prolactin secretion from normal anterior pituitary cells in a parallel cell column and haloperidol blocked this inhibition. Although oestrogen treatment in vivo stimulated prolactin release in vitro when the tumour was removed and studied in the cell column, oestrogen had no effect on the inability of dopamine to modify the prolactin secretion. Growth hormone release from the tumour cells was not affected by dopamine.
Although MtTW15 cells were refractory to dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin release, the dopamine receptors present in tumour homogenates were indistinguishable from the dopamine receptors previously defined in the normal anterior pituitary gland. The binding of the dopamine antagonist [3H]spiperone to the tumour was saturable (110 fmol/mg protein), of high affinity to one apparent class of sites (dissociation constant = 0·12 nmol/l), reversible and sensitive to guanine nucleotides. The pharmacology of the binding was defined in competition studies with a large number of agonists and antagonists. From the order of potency of these agents, a dopaminergic interaction was apparent. We conclude that the prolactin-secreting MtTW15 tumour cells appear to be completely unresponsive to dopamine or to the potent dopamine agonist bromocriptine, in spite of apparently normal dopamine receptors in the tumour.
Search for other papers by J. P. MTABAJI in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C. J. ROBINSON in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. S. MANKU in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. CRONIN in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D. F. HORROBIN in
Google Scholar
PubMed
SUMMARY
To test the effect of prostaglandin A2 (PGA2) on renal function, infusions of PGA2 (0·7 ng/ kg/min), arginine-vasopressin (AVP) (1·25 ng/kg/min) and PGA2 plus AVP were administered to male rats made resistant to the antidiuretic effect of AVP by pre-treatment with lithium. In non-lithium-treated control rats, AVP had its expected antidiuretic action but in lithium-treated rats neither urinary volume nor osmolarity was changed. Prostaglandin A2 alone had no effect on urine output in lithium-treated rats; AVP plus PGA2 infused together evoked a near normal antidiuretic response. This antidiuretic action of PGA2 contrasts with the diuretic action reported by others. However, our infusion rates were 300–4000 times lower than those of other workers and it is suggested that PGs may have opposite actions on the kidney depending on their concentration.
The effect of indomethacin (a blocker of prostaglandin synthesis) on urine flow was tested in five groups of rats on different régimes of liquid intake. Urine flow was reduced in the three groups with the highest urine volumes before treatment, and increased in the two groups with the lowest urinary volumes, again indicating that PGs may have both diuretic and antidiuretic actions.