Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: M. S. Venetikou x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
D. Wynick
Search for other papers by D. Wynick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. S. Venetikou
Search for other papers by M. S. Venetikou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Critchley
Search for other papers by R. Critchley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. M. Burrin
Search for other papers by J. M. Burrin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
S. R. Bloom
Search for other papers by S. R. Bloom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

ABSTRACT

Laser-light scatter signals generated from living cells provide useful information with regard to both cell size (forward-angle light scatter) and granularity (ninety-degree or perpendicular light scatter). By measuring angles of light scatter and fluorescence, a fluorescence-activated cell sorter is capable of analysing and sorting cells on the basis of their size, granularity and cell-surface fluorescence. Using an electronically programmable individual cell sorter we were able to analyse single, viable, dispersed anterior pituitary cells of the female rat on the basis of their laser light scatter characteristics. Two distinct populations of differing granularity were defined: 26±2·2% (mean ± s.e.m.) were more granular and 74±3·5% less granular. Acutely dispersed anterior pituitary cells were labelled with antibodies against four of the anterior pituitary hormones, and cell size and granularity were compared amongst the different hormonal cell types. Somatotrophs were the most granular cell type, gonadotrophs were the largest and corticotrophs the smallest, whilst lactotrophs were of intermediate size. Labelling was demonstrated to be dependent upon the secretory state of the cell. Hypothalamic stimulating factors increased cell-surface labelling, whilst dopamine and somatostatin decreased labelling. These changes compare favourably with published data obtained by immunocytochemistry. Using dual-colour fluorescence cell surface labelling we were unable to define a population of cells secreting both prolactin and growth hormone (mammosomatotrophs).

Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 126, 261–268

Restricted access
D. Wynick
Search for other papers by D. Wynick in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Critchley
Search for other papers by R. Critchley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. S. Venetikou
Search for other papers by M. S. Venetikou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. M. Burrin
Search for other papers by J. M. Burrin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
S. R. Bloom
Search for other papers by S. R. Bloom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

ABSTRACT

As the secretory granules of anterior pituitary cells fuse with the cell surface, there would appear to be sufficient hormone present on the cell surface to be labelled by polyclonal hormone antibodies and thus analysed by flow cytometry. We have therefore applied fluorescence-activated cell sorting to these labelled pituitary cells. Percentage purity and depletion of other cell types was assessed by immunocytochemistry and the reverse haemolytic plaque assay (RHPA). Results demonstrate that fluorescence-activated cell sorting allows almost complete purification of functional lactotrophs and somatotrophs to 96·7 ±1·7 (s.e.m.)% and 98±1·0% respectively by immunocytochemistry, and to 95·8 ±1·1% and 97±0·8% respectively by RHPA. Depletion of other anterior pituitary cell types to less than 2% was demonstrated by both immunocytochemistry and RHPA. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting to this degree of purity was routinely possible with cell yields of 91 ±3·4%. To obtain such purity/depletion, it was necessary to use specific antisera of high titre, at concentrations which ensured maximal cell-surface labelling associated with maximal stimulation of hormonal secretion by the appropriate hypothalamic stimulatory factor. Separating cells on the basis of the intensity of prolactin cell-surface labelling demonstrated a low level of binding of the prolactin antibody to gonadotrophs (but not of sufficient fluorescence intensity to be sorted into the prolactin enriched population), raising the possibility of prolactin receptors on gonadotrophs. We were unable to demonstrate the presence of mammosomatotrophs in the normal female rat, since purified lactotrophs did not contain or secrete GH nor did purified somatotrophs contain or secrete prolactin.

Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 126, 269–274

Restricted access