Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author: MP Hedger x
Clear All Modify Search
Free access

DM de Kretser, MP Hedger and DJ Phillips

Free access

DJ Phillips, JN Brauman, AJ Mason, DM de Kretser and MP Hedger

A new in vitro bioassay for activin was developed using the mouse plasmacytoma cell line, MPC-11. Human recombinant (hr) activin A dose-dependently inhibited the proliferation of these cells, whereas a range of other factors, including inhibin, follistatin and transforming growth factor-beta1, -beta2 and -beta3 had no effect. Conditioned medium containing activin B induced an inhibition similar to hr-activin A. The inhibitory influence of activin A could be blocked by follistatin, but not by hr-inhibin A. This bioassay had a sensitivity for activin A of around 0.4 ng/ml, an ED50 response of 3.5 ng/ml, and an intra-assay coefficient of variation of <11%. It offers substantial advantages over existing in vitro activin bioassays in terms of ease of use, specificity and throughput. The utility of the MPC-11 bioassay was demonstrated in the purification of activin from amniotic fluid, where an almost identical profile of bioactive activin A was detected compared with the pituitary cell bioassay of activin. Bioactive activin could also be detected in unpurified ovine allantoic and amniotic fluids and bovine follicular fluid. Measuring activin in untreated and heat-treated human sera or seminal plasma was hampered by a non-specific inhibitory effect, so that several serum samples did not run parallel with the hr-activin A standard. This inhibitory effect by serum could not be overcome by addition of follistatin, suggesting it is not activin-like bioactivity. This new bioassay for activin demonstrates widespread applicability for monitoring of purified or partially purified samples during purification procedures, bioactivity measurements, receptor-binding studies and assays of cell culture medium.

Free access

RM Gow, MK O'Bryan, BJ Canny, GT Ooi and MP Hedger

A single intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) causes a biphasic suppression of testicular steroidogenesis in adult rats, with inhibition at 6 h and 18-24 h after injection. The inhibition of steroidogenesis is independent of the reduction in circulating LH that also occurs after LPS treatment, indicating a direct effect of inflammation at the Leydig cell level. The relative contributions to this inhibition by intratesticular versus systemic responses to inflammation, including the adrenal glucocorticoids, was investigated in this study. Adult male Wistar rats (eight/group) received injections of LPS (0.1 mg/kg i.p.), dexamethasone (DEX; 50 microg/kg i.p.), LPS and DEX, or saline only (controls), and were killed 6 h, 18 h and 72 h later. Treatment with LPS stimulated body temperature and serum corticosterone levels measured 6 h later. Administration of DEX had no effect on body temperature, but suppressed serum corticosterone levels. At the dose used in this study, DEX alone had no effect on serum LH or testosterone at any time-point. Expression of mRNA for interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), the principal inflammatory cytokine, was increased in both testis and liver of LPS-treated rats. Serum LH and testosterone levels were considerably reduced at 6 h and 18 h after LPS treatment, and had not completely recovered by 72 h. At 6 h after injection, DEX inhibited basal IL-1beta expression and the LPS-induced increase of IL-1beta mRNA levels in the liver, but had no effect on IL-1beta in the testis. The effects of DEX on IL-1beta levels in the liver were no longer evident by 18 h. In LPS-treated rats, DEX caused a significant reversal of the inhibition of serum LH and testosterone at 18 h, although not at 6 h or 72 h. Accordingly, DEX inhibited the systemic inflammatory response, but had no direct effect on either testicular steroidogenesis or intra-testicular inflammation, at the dose employed. These data suggest that the inhibition of Leydig cell steroidogenesis at 6 h after LPS injection, which was not prevented by co-administration of DEX, is most likely due to direct actions of LPS at the testicular level. In contrast, the later Leydig cell inhibition (at 18 h) may be attributable to extra-testicular effects of LPS, such as increased circulating inflammatory mediators or the release of endogenous glucocorticoids, that were inhibited by DEX treatment. These data indicate that the early and late phases of Leydig cell inhibition following LPS administration are due to separate mechanisms.