Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Nathalie M Delzenne x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Julie Rodriguez Metabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Julie Rodriguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Nathalie M Delzenne Metabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Nathalie M Delzenne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The gut microbiota is now widely recognized as an important factor contributing to the regulation of host metabolic functions. Numerous studies describe an imbalance in the gut microbial ecosystem in response to an energy-dense diet that drives the development of metabolic disorders. In this context, the manipulation of the gut microbiota by food components acting as prebiotics appears as a promising strategy. Several studies have already investigated the beneficial potency of prebiotics, mostly inulin-type fructans, on host metabolism and key intestinal functions including gut hormone release. For the last 20 years, several non-digestible compounds present in food have been shown to modulate the gut microbiota and influence host metabolism in essential organs involved in the control of energy homeostasis. To date, numerous reviews summarize the impact of prebiotics on the liver or the brain. Here we propose to describe the mechanisms by which prebiotics, through modulation of the gut microbiota and endocrine functions, modulates the metabolic cross-talk communication between the gut, the adipose tissue and skeletal muscles.

Free access
Patrice D Cani Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and Toxicology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Unit of Animal Biology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Patrice D Cani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Catherine A Daubioul Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and Toxicology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Unit of Animal Biology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Catherine A Daubioul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brigitte Reusens Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and Toxicology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Unit of Animal Biology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Brigitte Reusens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Claude Remacle Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and Toxicology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Unit of Animal Biology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Claude Remacle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Grégory Catillon Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and Toxicology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Unit of Animal Biology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Grégory Catillon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nathalie M Delzenne Unit of Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, Nutrition and Toxicology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Unit of Animal Biology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

Search for other papers by Nathalie M Delzenne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

We have evaluated the influence of oligofructose (OFS), a fermentable dietary fibre, on glucose homeostasis, insulin production and intestinal glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats.

Male Wistar rats received either i.v. streptozotocin (STZ; 40 mg/kg) or vehicle (CT); one week later, they were fed for 6 weeks with either the standard diet (STZ-CT), or with a diet containing 10% oligofructose (STZ-OFS); both diets were available ad libitum. In a second set of experiments (duration 4 weeks), a supplemental group of food-restricted rats (STZ-Res) receiving a similar intake as CT rats, was added.

OFS improved glucose tolerance and reduced food intake as compared with STZ-CT rats in both the post-prandial state and after an oral glucose tolerance test. After 6 weeks, portal and pancreatic insulin concentrations were doubled in STZ-OFS rats. Food restriction improved these parameters when compared with STZ-CT rats, but to a lesser extent than in the STZ-OFS group. We have shown that OFS treatment increased portal and colonic GLP-1(7–36) amide levels and doubled colonic proglucagon and prohormone convertase 1 mRNA levels; both OFS and food restriction lowered ileal GLP-1(7–36) amide levels as compared with levels in STZ-CT rats.

We propose that OFS, through its fermentation in the colon, promotes the expression and secretion of colonic peptides, namely GLP-1(7–36) amide, with beneficial consequences on glycaemia, insulin secretion and hyperphagia in diabetic rats.

Free access