Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for

  • Author: R W Schulz x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Nilli Zmora Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
Research Group Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
Physiology of Growth and Reproduction in Fish, Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Nilli Zmora in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yukinori Kazeto Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
Research Group Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
Physiology of Growth and Reproduction in Fish, Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Yukinori Kazeto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R Sampath Kumar Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
Research Group Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
Physiology of Growth and Reproduction in Fish, Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by R Sampath Kumar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rüdiger W Schulz Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
Research Group Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
Physiology of Growth and Reproduction in Fish, Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by Rüdiger W Schulz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
John M Trant Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 701 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA
Research Group Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Utrecht, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
Physiology of Growth and Reproduction in Fish, Institute of Marine Research, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway

Search for other papers by John M Trant in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Due to the lack of purified, native gonadotropins (GtH) for almost all species of fish, we designed a system for the production of recombinant bioactive luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) using the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) as a model animal. The strategy was to produce the three subunits composing FSH and LH, i.e. the common α-subunit (α-glycoprotein hormone (α-GP)), β-FSH, and β-LH subunit, individually in stable recombinant insect cells (S2) with C-terminal His-tag. This expression system was also used to co-express the α-subunit without the His-tag with each of the His-tagged β-subunits. The recombinant S2 cells were capable of secreting FSH and LH heterodimers and α-GP in abundance; however, expression of the individual β-subunits was much less successful. The recombinant GtHs were partially purified from the cell medium by immobilized metal affinity chromatography to ~15% purity with a yield of 7 and 4 mg per liter of medium for FSH and LH respectively. These recombinant GtHs activated their receptors in vitro, enhanced estrogen secretion, up-regulated several steroidogenic enzyme genes in channel catfish ovarian follicles, and increased androgen secretion from African catfish testis. Interestingly, the FSH and LH dose–response curves for each of these biological activities clearly demonstrate differences in their cellular action and physiological roles. This expression system may be an important development for the production of species-specific GtHs so that FSH- and LH-specific mechanisms of actions within the reproductive endocrine processes can finally be examined with homologous, albeit recombinant, hormones.

Free access
R W Schulz
Search for other papers by R W Schulz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M C A van der Sanden
Search for other papers by M C A van der Sanden in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P T Bosma
Search for other papers by P T Bosma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
H J Th Goos
Search for other papers by H J Th Goos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Abstract

The sensitivity of the pituitary to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and that of the testis to gonadotrophin (GTH) was monitored in African catfish in vivo at different stages of pubertal development (20, 21, 24, 31, 39, 42 and 49 weeks of age). The fish were injected i.p. with chicken GnRH-II (cGnRH-II) or catfish GnRH (cfGnRH), their two endogenous GnRHs. Blood samples were collected to quantify LH-like GTH-II and three androgens 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT), testosterone and 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione (OHA). The testes of 20- and 21-week-old fish contained spermatogonia alone, or spermatogonia and spermatocytes, or – in a limited number of specimens – some spermatids as well. Spermatozoa were first observed in the testes of 24-week-old fish and became predominant as the fish attained full maturity (49 weeks of age). In 20- to 24-week-old fish, significantly elevated plasma GTH-II levels were only recorded after treatment with cGnRH-II. In 31- to 49-week-old fish, injection of both GnRHs led to increased plasma GTH-II levels, but cGnRH-II was always more effective than cfGnRH. Whereas basal GTH-II plasma levels hardly changed throughout the study, GnRH-stimulated levels increased with the age of the fish. Plasma concentrations of 11-KT were not different from controls in 20- and 21-week-old males despite their elevated GTH-II levels following injection of cGnRH-II. The first significant increase in levels of 11-KT after cGnRH-II treatment was observed in 24-week-old fish and, after cfGnRH treatment, in 39-week-old fish. Basal and GnRH-stimulated 11-KT plasma levels increased with the age of the fish. Basal and cGnRH-II-stimulated plasma levels of OHA and testosterone also increased with the age of the fish. However, the levels of OHA and testosterone were five- to tenfold lower than those of 11-KT and, except for OHA in the 49-week-old fish, no increases were recorded in the cfGnRH-injected fish. Our data show that at the beginning of spermatogenesis the pituitary gland is already sensitive to GnRH stimuli. However, sensitivity of the testicular steroidogenic system to GTH-II, sufficient to be reflected in consistently elevated androgen plasma levels, was not observed until 3–4 weeks later. The restricted testicular GTH-II responsiveness at the beginning of spermatogenesis may represent a limiting factor for further pubertal development.

Journal of Endocrinology (1994) 140, 265–273

Restricted access
Michelle C Melo Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Michelle C Melo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eva Andersson Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Eva Andersson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Per Gunnar Fjelldal Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Per Gunnar Fjelldal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jan Bogerd Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Jan Bogerd in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luiz R França Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Luiz R França in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Geir Lasse Taranger Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Geir Lasse Taranger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rüdiger W Schulz Department of Morphology, Reproductive Biology Group, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Marine Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for other papers by Rüdiger W Schulz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The Atlantic salmon shows substantial life cycle plasticity, which also applies to the timing of puberty. While it is characterized by the activation of the brain–pituitary–gonad axis, many morphophysiological aspects of puberty and the influence of environmental conditions, such as water salinity, are not well understood in fish. Here, 12-month-old Atlantic salmon coming from an out-of-season smoltification regime in December were exposed to freshwater (FW) or seawater (SW) at 16 °C to stimulate puberty under a 24-h constant light (LL) or 12 h light:12 h darkness (LD) photoperiod. These four treatment groups (FWLL, SWLL, FWLD, and SWLD) were studied from January to March. Next to 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) plasma levels, the expression of pituitary genes (gnrhr4, fshb, and lhb) and spermatogenesis was quantified. When spermatogonial proliferation started, fshb mRNA levels increased steeply and began to decrease when spermatogonial mitosis approached completion and most germ cells had reached meiotic or post-meiotic stages. Conversely, lhb mRNA levels increased progressively during spermatogenesis. Most males in all treatment groups matured, but exposure to SW resulted in the strongest stimulation of the onset of spermatogenesis and elevation of pituitary gnrhr4 and fshb mRNA levels. Later on, the LD photoperiod accelerated, irrespective of the salinity, the completion of spermatogenesis, associated with higher lhb mRNA and 11-KT plasma levels than in the LL groups. We find that both salinity and photoperiod modulated different aspects of spermatogenesis, and resulted in a differential activation of pituitary and testis functions; SW stimulating the onset and the shorter photoperiod the completion of spermatogenesis.

Free access
P T Bosma
Search for other papers by P T Bosma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S M Kolk
Search for other papers by S M Kolk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F E M Rebers
Search for other papers by F E M Rebers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
O Lescroart
Search for other papers by O Lescroart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
I Roelants
Search for other papers by I Roelants in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P H G M Willems
Search for other papers by P H G M Willems in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R W Schulz
Search for other papers by R W Schulz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Gonadotrophs are the primary target cells for GnRH in the pituitary. However, during a limited period of neonatal life in the rat, lactotrophs and somatotrophs respond to GnRH as well. Also, in the adults of a number of teleost fishes (e.g. carp, goldfish, and tilapia but not trout), GnRH is a potent GH secretagogue. In studying hypophysiotrophic actions of the two forms of GnRH present in the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus), chicken GnRH-II ([His5,Trp7,Tyr8]GnRH; cGnRH-II) and catfish GnRH ([His5,Asn8]GnRH; cfGnRH), we have investigated the effects of GnRH on catfish gonadotrophs and somatotrophs. GnRH binding was examined by incubating dispersed pituitary cells attached to coverslips with 125I-labelled [d-Arg6,Trp7,Leu8,Pro9-Net]GnRH (sGnRHa), a salmon GnRH analogue with high affinity for the GnRH receptor. Following fixation and immunohistochemistry using antisera against catfish LH and GH, 125I-labelled sGnRHa was localised autoradiographically and silver grains were quantified on gonadotrophs and somatotrophs. Specific binding of 125I-labelled sGnRHa was restricted to gonadotrophs. Both cfGnRH and cGnRH-II dose-dependently inhibited 125I-labelled sGnRHa binding to gonadotrophs. To substantiate the localisation of functional GnRH receptors, the effects of cfGnRH and cGnRH-II on the cytosolic free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) were examined in Fura-2-loaded somatotrophs and gonadotrophs. GnRH-induced increases in [Ca2+]i appeared to be confined to gonadotrophs, in which both endogenous GnRHs caused a single and transient increase in [Ca2+]i. The amplitude of this [Ca2+]i transient depended on the GnRH dose and correlated well with the GnRHs' effect on LH release. In vivo experiments demonstrated that GnRH treatments which markedly elevated plasma LH levels had no effect on plasma GH levels, while a dopamine agonist (apomorphine) significantly elevated plasma GH levels. We conclude that the two endogenous forms of GnRH in the African catfish are not directly involved in the regulation of the release of GH, suggesting that GnRHs cannot be considered as GH secretagogues in teleosts in general.

Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 152, 437–446

Restricted access