Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: RL Ornberg x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
CP Carron
Search for other papers by CP Carron in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
DM Meyer
Search for other papers by DM Meyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
VW Engleman
Search for other papers by VW Engleman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
JG Rico
Search for other papers by JG Rico in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
PG Ruminski
Search for other papers by PG Ruminski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
RL Ornberg
Search for other papers by RL Ornberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
WF Westlin
Search for other papers by WF Westlin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
GA Nickols
Search for other papers by GA Nickols in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Osteoclasts are actively motile on bone surfaces and undergo alternating cycles of migration and resorption. Osteoclast interaction with the extracellular matrix plays a key role in the osteoclast resorptive process and a substantial body of evidence suggests that integrin receptors are important in osteoclast function. These integrin receptors bind to the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence found in a variety of extracellular matrix proteins and it is well established that the interaction of osteoclast alpha v beta 3 integrin with the RGD motif within bone matrix proteins is important in osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In this study, we characterized the effects of two synthetic peptidomimetic antagonists of alpha v beta 3, SC-56631 and SC-65811, on rabbit osteoclast adhesion to purified matrix proteins and bone, and on bone resorption in vitro. SC-56631 and SC-65811 are potent inhibitors of vitronectin binding to purified alpha v beta 3. Both SC-56631 and SC-65811 inhibited osteoclast adhesion to osteopontin- and vitronectin-coated surfaces and time-lapse video microscopy showed that osteoclasts rapidly retract from osteopontin-coated surfaces when exposed to SC-56631 and SC-65811. SC-56631 and SC-65811 blocked osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in a dose-responsive manner. Further analysis showed that SC-65811 and SC-56631 reduced the number of resorption pits produced per osteoclast and the average pit size. SC-65811 was a more potent inhibitor of bone resorption and the combination of reduced pit number and size led to a 90% inhibition of bone resorption. Surprisingly, however, osteoclasts treated with SC-65811, SC-56631 or the disintegrin echistatin, at concentrations that inhibit bone resorption did not inhibit osteoclast adhesion to bone. These results suggest that alphavbeta3 antagonists inhibited bone resorption by decreasing osteoclast bone resorptive activity or efficiency but not by inhibiting osteoclast adhesion to bone per se.

Free access