Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for

  • Author: S Patterson x
  • Refine by access: All content x
Clear All Modify Search
ANITA M. MANDL
Search for other papers by ANITA M. MANDL in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. ZUCKERMAN
Search for other papers by S. ZUCKERMAN in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
H. D. PATTERSON
Search for other papers by H. D. PATTERSON in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Fifty-eight female rats belonging to thirteen litters were subjected to the following treatments:

A: right ovary removed; more than half of left ovary resected.

B: right ovary removed; left ovary untreated.

C: same as A, but remaining fragment of left ovary painted with tannic acid in order to destroy the germinal epithelium.

D: right ovary removed; surface of whole left ovary painted with tannic acid.

The animals were killed 50–136 days after operation, and the number of oocytes counted in the whole left ovary or in the parts of the left ovary removed at operation and autopsy. The number of oocytes in the right ovary was estimated in one animal from each litter.

Compensatory hypertrophy occurred in the left ovary or left ovarian fragment, but the number of oocytes did not increase. Tannic acid had no noticeable effect on the numbers of oocytes. The ovarian fragments contained a disproportionately high number of Graafian follicles, and the rate of loss of oocytes appears to increase inversely with the amount of ovarian tissue left in the body.

Restricted access
C Gonzalez
Search for other papers by C Gonzalez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A Alonso
Search for other papers by A Alonso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
N Alvarez
Search for other papers by N Alvarez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F Diaz
Search for other papers by F Diaz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Martinez
Search for other papers by M Martinez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S Fernandez
Search for other papers by S Fernandez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
AM Patterson
Search for other papers by AM Patterson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The mechanism for the development of insulin resistance in normal pregnancy is complex and is associated with serum levels of both progesterone and 17beta-estradiol. However, it remains unclear whether estrogens alone or progestins alone can cause insulin resistance, or whether it is a combination of both which produces this effect. We attempted to determine the role played by progesterone and/or 17beta-estradiol on the phenomena of sensitivity to insulin action that take place during pregnancy in the rat. Ovariectomized rats were treated with different doses of progesterone and/or 17beta-estradiol in order to simulate the plasma levels in normal pregnant rats. A euglycemic/hyperinsulinemic clamp was used to measure insulin sensitivity. At days 6 and 11, vehicle (V)- and progesterone (P)-treated groups were more insulin resistant than 17beta-estradiol (E)- and 17beta-estradiol+progesterone (EP)-treated groups. Nevertheless, at day 16, the V, EP and E groups were more resistant to insulin action than the P group. On the other hand, the V, EP and E groups were more insulin resistant at day 16 than at day 6, whereas the P group was more insulin resistant at day 6 than at day 16. Our results seem to suggest that the absence of female steroid hormones gives rise to a decreased insulin sensitivity. The rise in insulin sensitivity during early pregnancy, when the plasma concentrations of 17beta-estradiol and progesterone are low, could be due to 17beta-estradiol. However, during late pregnancy when the plasma concentrations of 17beta-estradiol and progesterone are high, the role of 17beta-estradiol could be to antagonize the effect of progesterone, diminishing insulin sensitivity.

Free access
S Patterson School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
Department of Biochemistry, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Search for other papers by S Patterson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P R Flatt School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
Department of Biochemistry, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Search for other papers by P R Flatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L Brennan School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
Department of Biochemistry, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Search for other papers by L Brennan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P Newsholme School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
Department of Biochemistry, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Search for other papers by P Newsholme in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
N H McClenaghan School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
Department of Biochemistry, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Search for other papers by N H McClenaghan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Elevated plasma homocysteine has been reported in individuals with diseases of the metabolic syndrome including vascular disease and insulin resistance. As homocysteine exerts detrimental effects on endothelial and neuronal cells, this study investigated effects of acute homocysteine exposure on β-cell function and insulin secretion using clonal BRIN-BD11 β-cells. Acute insulin release studies in the presence of various test reagents were performed using monolayers of BRIN-BD11 cells and samples assayed by insulin radioimmunoassay. Cellular glucose metabolism was assessed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis following 60-min exposure of BRIN-BD11 cell monolayers to glucose in either the absence or presence of homocysteine. Homocysteine dose-dependently inhibited insulin release at moderate and stimulatory glucose concentrations. This inhibitory effect was reversible at all but the highest concentration of homocysteine. 13C-glucose NMR demonstrated decreased labelling of glutamate from glucose at positions C2, C3 and C4, indicating that the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle-dependent glucose metabolism was reduced in the presence of homocysteine. Homocysteine also dose-dependently inhibited insulinotropic responses to a range of glucose-dependent secretagogues including nutrients (alanine, arginine, 2-ketoisocaproate), hormones (glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36)amide, gastric inhibitory polypeptide and cholecystokinin-8), neurotransmitter (carbachol), drug (tolbutamide) as well as a depolarising concentration of KCl or elevated Ca2+. Insulin secretion induced by activation of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase C pathways with forskolin and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate were also inhibited by homocysteine. These effects were not associated with any adverse action on cellular insulin content or cell viability, and there was no increase in apoptosis/necrosis following exposure to homocysteine. These data indicate that homocysteine impairs insulin secretion through alterations in β-cell glucose metabolism and generation of key stimulus-secretion coupling factors. The participation of homocysteine in possible β-cell demise merits further investigation.

Free access
Nirun Hewawasam N Hewawasam, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Nirun Hewawasam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Debalina Sakar D Sakar, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Debalina Sakar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olivia Bolton O Bolton, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Olivia Bolton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Blerinda Delishaj B Delishaj, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Blerinda Delishaj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maha Almutairi M Almutairi, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Maha Almutairi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aileen King A King, Department of Diabetes, King's College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Aileen King in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ayse S Dereli A Dereli, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Pôle d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Nutrition, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Search for other papers by Ayse S Dereli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chloe Despontin C Despontin, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Pôle d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Nutrition, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Search for other papers by Chloe Despontin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patrick Gilon P Gilon, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Pôle d'Endocrinologie, Diabète et Nutrition, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Search for other papers by Patrick Gilon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sue Reeves S Reeves, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Sue Reeves in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael Patterson M Patterson, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Michael Patterson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Astrid Christine Hauge-Evans A Hauge-Evans, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search for other papers by Astrid Christine Hauge-Evans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

LEAP2, a liver-derived antagonist for the ghrelin receptor, GHSR1a, counteracts effects of ghrelin on appetite and energy balance. Less is known about its impact on blood glucose-regulating hormones from pancreatic islets. Here we investigate whether acyl-ghrelin (AG) and LEAP2 regulate islet hormone release in a cell type- and sex-specific manner. Hormone content from secretion experiments with isolated islets from male and female mice was measured by radioimmunoassay and mRNA expression by qPCR. LEAP2 enhanced insulin secretion in islets from males (p<0.01) but not females (p<0.2), whilst AG-stimulated somatostatin release was significantly reversed by LEAP2 in males (p<0.001) but not females (p<0.2). Glucagon release was not significantly affected by AG and LEAP2. Ghsr1a, Ghrelin, Leap2, Mrap2, Mboat4 and Sstr3 islet mRNA expression did not differ between sexes. In control male islets maintained without 17-beta oestradiol (E2), AG exerted an insulinostatic effect (p<0.05), with a trend towards reversal by LEAP2 (p=0.06). Both were abolished by 72h E2 pre-treatment (10 nmol/l, p<0.2). AG-stimulated somatostatin release was inhibited by LEAP2 from control (p<0.001) but not E2-treated islets (p<0.2). LEAP2 and AG did not modulate insulin secretion from MIN6 beta cells and Mrap2 was downregulated (P<0.05) and Ghsr1a upregulated (P<0.0001) in islets from Sst-/- mice. Our findings show that AG and LEAP2 regulate insulin and somatostatin release in an opposing and sex-dependent manner, which in males can be modulated by E2. We suggest that regulation of SST release is a key starting point for understanding the role of GHSR1a in islet function and glucose metabolism.

Restricted access