Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for
- Author: Y Ono x
- Refine by access: All content x
Search for other papers by K. Shibayama in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y. Ohyama in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M. Ono in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S. Furudate in
Google Scholar
PubMed
ABSTRACT
The rdw rat (gene symbol: rdw) with hereditary dwarfism has been shown immunohistochemically to have subnormal numbers not only of GH- but also of prolactin- and thyrotrophin-positive cells. To characterize the dwarfism of this strain, the expression of pituitary hormone mRNAs was examined by Northern hybridization. The pituitary gland in the rdw rat expressed 30–100 times less GH and prolactin mRNAs than normal controls, whereas mRNAs for pro-opiomelanocortin and the α subunit of rat glycoprotein hormone revealed a significant increase. There was a non-significant difference in rat LH-β subunit and FSH-β subunit between normal and rdw rats. The suppressed expression of a pituitary-specific transcription factor, Pit-1, is considered to cause hereditary dwarfism in mouse strains Snell and Jackson, whose phenotypes resemble those of the rdw rat. In this study, however, no difference in mRNA expression for Pit-1 was found between rdw rats and controls. This work indicates that the rdw rat may not have the same genotype as the phenotypically similar dwarf mice, Snell, Jackson and Ames.
Journal of Endocrinology (1993) 138, 307–313
Search for other papers by K Horiguchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Yagi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Ono in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y Nishiura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Tanaka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Ishida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Harigaya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Prolactin (PRL) is a single-chain polypeptide hormone that is generally secreted from prolactin cells of the anterior pituitary gland into the blood circulation. However, recent studies indicate that the gene expression of prolactin is ectopic in several tissues across several species. These studies found that lymphocytes also produce PRL, which is involved in the immunoregulatory system. Here, we searched for PRL messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), using the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Southern blotting in the spleens of mice at various growth stages. We also localized mouse prolactin (mPRL) and its mRNA in the spleens of 30- and 60-day-old mice by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization respectively. The mPRL gene was expressed in all spleen samples at 0–60 days postpartum. We localized mPRL mRNA in the sheathed artery, periarterial lymphatic sheath and the marginal zone of the spleen. Moreover, we detected mPRL in essentially the same area as its mRNA. Furthermore, we performed double-fluorescence immunohistochemical staining for mPRL and mouse CD4 that is specifically produced in helper T cells, or for mPRL and mouse CD19 or CD40 specified B cells. We colocalized mPRL immunoreactivity only in some CD4-immunopositive cells. These results clearly suggest that T cells synthesize mPRL in the mouse spleen.
Search for other papers by Y Nakamura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Tamura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Ono in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Shimamura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Sugino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by F Numa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Ueda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Kato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the possible mechanism through which RU486 induces luteolysis during the late-luteal phase in pseudopregnant (PSP) rats. PSP rats received a subcutaneous injection of RU486 in sesame oil (5 mg/kg body weight) or sesame oil alone once a day between day 9 and day 11 of pseudopregnancy. Serial blood samples were collected on days 5, 9, 10, 11 and 12 and assayed for progesterone content. To examine the possible action of RU486 through a uterine and/or a pituitary (prolactin-dependent) mechanism, PSP rats and chronic hysterectomized PSP rats which had been hysterectomized before PSP induction received a subcutaneous injection of RU486 in sesame oil (5 mg/kg body weight), sesame oil alone, prolactin in 50% polyvinylpyrrolidone (15 IU/day), or RU486 and prolactin once a day between day 9 and day 11 of pseudopregnancy. Serial blood samples were collected on days 5, 9, 10 and 11 and assayed for progesterone content. Blood samples were also collected at 0400 h on day 12 and used for prolactin and progesterone determinations. To examine the direct effect of RU486 on corpus luteum and/or pituitary, hysterectomized rats underwent hypophysectomy and pituitary autotransplantation on dioestrus 1 and received a subcutaneous injection of RU486 in sesame oil or sesame oil alone for 3 days between day 21 and day 23 after surgery. Serial blood samples were collected on days 10, 21, 22, 23 and 24 and assayed for progesterone and prolactin contents.
In ordinary PSP rats, serum progesterone levels were significantly (P<0·01) lower in the RU486-treated group than in the control group (9 ± 1 vs 53 ± 7 ng/ml; mean ± s.e.m.) on day 11. Serum prolactin levels at 0400 h on day 12 of pseudopregnancy were significantly (P<0·05) lower in the RU486-treated group than in the control group (16 ±4 vs 154 ±44 ng/ml; mean ± s.e.m.). The concomitant prolactin treatment reversed the luteolytic effects of RU486 on day 11 of pseudopregnancy. In hysterectomized PSP rats, RU486 also suppressed serum prolactin levels, and the concomitant prolactin treatment again reversed the luteolytic effects of RU486. In hysterectomized rats which were hypophysectomized and pituitary autotransplanted, RU486 treatment did not induce any significant changes in serum progesterone and prolactin levels.
These results indicated that RU486 induced luteolysis during the late-luteal phase in PSP rats by suppressing prolactin secretion via a hypothalamic mechanism.
Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 150, 93–98
Search for other papers by Y Itoh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by S Imamura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Yamamoto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y Ono in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Nagata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Kobayashi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Kato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Tomita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Nakai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Itoh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Nagasaka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentrations are increased in patients with diabetes mellitus, particularly those with diabetic retinopathy, or essential hypertension. We hypothesized that ET-1 might participate in the development and progression of diabetic microangiopathy. In this study, the effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril maleate, on diabetic angiopathy were examined in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic (STZ-DM) rats by monitoring variations in renal function and ET-1 concentrations in blood and organ tissues. Significant increases in kidney weight and in concentrations of urinary albumin, N-acetyl-fl-d-glucosamidase (NAG) and serum ET-1 were observed in the STZ-DM rats as compared with the non-diabetic rats, and the concentration of ET-1 in the kidneys tended to be increased. Microscopic and electron microscopic analyses showed increased mesangial cell proliferation, matrix expansion and enlarged mesangial area in the kidney of the diabetic rats. After administration of the ACE inhibitor, increased concentrations of urinary albumin and NAG in the STZ-DM rats were reduced to the control values with a slight improvement in the electron microscopic changes. These data suggest that ET-1 may be involved in the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy and may explain, in part, why diabetes is liable to complicate hypertension. ACE inhibitor may help to restore diabetic nephropathy in the STZ-induced diabetic rats.
Search for other papers by K Iizuka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H Nakajima in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Ono in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Okita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Miyazaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Miyagawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Namba in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Hanafusa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Y Matsuzawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Glucose-6-phosphatase (G-6-Pase) hydrolyzes glucose-6-phosphate to glucose, reciprocal with the so-called glucose sensor, glucokinase, in pancreatic beta cells. To study the role of G-6-Pase in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from beta cells, we have introduced rat G-6-Pase catalytic subunit cDNA and have established permanent clones with 3-, 7- and 24-fold G-6-Pase activity of the mouse beta-cell line, MIN6. In these clones, glucose usage and ATP production in the presence of 5.5 or 25 mM glucose were reduced, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was decreased in proportion to the increased G-6-Pase activity. In addition, insulin secretory capacity in response to d-fructose and pyruvate was unchanged; however, 25 mM glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and intracellular calcium response were completely inhibited. In the clone with 24-fold G-6-Pase activity, changes in intracellular NAD(P)H autofluorescence in response to 25 mM glucose were reduced, but the changes with 20 mM fructose and 20 mM pyruvate were not altered. Stable overexpression of G-6-Pase in beta cells resulted in attenuation of the overall glucose-stimulated metabolic responses corresponding to the degree of overexpression. This particular experimental manipulation shows that the possibility exists of modulating glucose-stimulated insulin release by thoroughly altering glucose cycling at the glucokinase/G-6-Pase step.