Search Results
Search for other papers by C García-Luna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P Soberanes-Chávez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P de Gortari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
interval of 10–12 h during activity phase, regardless of food quality or quantity, reduces body weight ( Gill & Panda 2015 ). Thus, uncoupling the release of rest/activity cycle-induced hormones with feeding schedules by changing eating habits, impairs
Search for other papers by C Aceves in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Escobar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Rojas-Huidobro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by O Vazquez-Martinez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Martinez-Merlos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Aguilar-Roblero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Diaz-Munoz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Restricted feeding schedules (RFSs) produce a behavioral activation known as anticipatory activity, which is a manifestation of a food-entrained oscillator (FEO). The liver could be playing a role in the physiology of FEO. Here we demonstrate that the activity of liver selenoenzyme deiodinase type 1 (D1), which transforms thyroxine into triiodothyronine (T3), decreases before food access and increases after food presentation in RFSs. These changes in D1 activity were not due to variations in D1 mRNA. In contrast, a 24 h fast promoted a decrease in both D1 activity and mRNA content. The adjustment in hepatic D1 activity was accompanied by a similar modification in T3-dependent malic enzyme, suggesting that the local generation of T3 has physiological implications in the liver. These results support the notion that the physiological state of rats under RFSs is unique and distinct from rats fed freely or fasted for 24 h. Data also suggest a possible role of hepatic D1 enzyme in coordinating the homeorhetic state of the liver when this organ participates in FEO expression.
Frontier Science Research Center, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
Search for other papers by Cho-Rong Bae in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kazuya Hasegawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sayaka Akieda-Asai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yurie Kawasaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Frontier Science Research Center, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-1692, Japan
Search for other papers by Kazuyo Senba in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Youn-Soo Cha in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yukari Date in
Google Scholar
PubMed
responses of gastrointestinal hormones to food intake, glucose metabolism, and insulin signaling in male Wistar rats fed SP or CP on a 3-h restricted feeding schedule. We also evaluated energy intake, body weight, energy expenditure, and the amount of food
Search for other papers by MT Martinez-Merlos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Angeles-Castellanos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Diaz-Munoz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R Aguilar-Roblero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C Escobar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Digestive and metabolic processes are entrained by restricted feeding (RFS) schedules and are thought to be potential elements of a food-entrained oscillator (FEO). Due to the close relationship of leptin with metabolic regulation and because leptin is a relevant communication signal of the individual's peripheral metabolic condition with the central nervous system, we explored whether leptin is an endogenous entraining signal from the periphery to a central element of an FEO. First we characterized in the rat the diurnal rhythm of serum leptin (in rats fed ad libitum (AL)), its adjustment to an RFS and the influence of fasting after RFS, or RFS followed by AL feeding and then total food deprivation (RF-AF) in the persistence of this fluctuating pattern. We also explored the response of free fatty acids and stomach weight under the same entraining conditions. We compared the metabolic response with the behavioral expression of drinking anticipatory activity (AA) under the same conditions. Finally, we tested the effect of daily i.c.v administration of leptin as a putative entraining signal for the generation of AA.Metabolic parameters responded to food entrainment by adjusting their phase to mealtime. However, leptin and free fatty acid rhythms persisted only for a few cycles in fasting conditions and readjusted to the light-darkness cycle after an RF-AF protocol. In contrast, behavioral food-entrained rhythms persisted after both fasting manipulations. Daily leptin i.c.v. administration did not produce AA, nor produce changes in the behavioral free-running rhythm. Stomach weight indicated an adaptive process allowing an extreme stomach distension followed by a slow emptying process, which suggests that the stomach may be playing a relevant role as a storage organ. In conclusion, metabolic signals here studied respond to feeding schedules by adjusting their phase to mealtime, but do only persist for a few cycles in fasting. Leptin does not produce AA and thus is not an entraining signal for FEO. The response of metabolic signals to feeding schedules depends on different mechanisms than the expression of AA.
Search for other papers by Candice Marion in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Zizzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raphael G P Denis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rim Hassouna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yacine Chebani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thierry Leste-Lasserre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hélène Doat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gwenaëlle Le Pen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniela Cota in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florence Noble in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Serge Luquet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacques Pantel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
/M and Ghsr WT/WT littermate rats habituated to a single housing cage with free access to running wheels were put on a restricted feeding schedule. Unexpectedly, during the ad libitum feeding period, Ghsr M/M rats showed decreased running activity
Search for other papers by Esther Isorna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nuria de Pedro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ana I Valenciano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ángel L Alonso-Gómez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by María J Delgado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
daily feeding schedule (under constant light) synchronises clock gene rhythms in the optic tectum, hypothalamus, liver and gut in goldfish, at both scheduled meal times, 10:00 and 22:00 ( Feliciano et al. 2011 , Nisembaum et al. 2012 ). However
Search for other papers by Renata Lopes Araujo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bruno Moulin de Andrade in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Álvaro Souto Padron de Figueiredo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Monique Leandro da Silva in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michelle Porto Marassi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Valmara dos Santos Pereira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eliete Bouskela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Denise P Carvalho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
fellowships from CNPq during the present study. References Aceves C Escobar C Rojas-Huidobro R Vazquez-Martinez O Martinez-Merlos T Aguilar-Roblero R Diaz-Munoz M 2003 Liver 5′-deiodinase activity is modified in rats under restricted feeding
Search for other papers by G Boaventura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Casimiro-Lopes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by C C Pazos-Moura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Oliveira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by P C Lisboa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E G Moura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
2003 Liver 5′-deiodinase activity is modified in rats under restricted feeding schedules: evidence for post-translational regulation . Journal of Endocrinology 179 91 – 96 . ( doi:10.1677/joe.0.1790091 ) Ahrén B Scheurink AJ 1998 Marked
Search for other papers by E M de Vries in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by H C van Beeren in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M T Ackermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hypothalamic Integration Mechanisms, Laboratory of Endocrinology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by A Kalsbeek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by E Fliers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Boelen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
( Araujo et al . 2008 , 2009 ). As feeding schedules from their study and the this study are more or less similar (21 days 50% restriction vs 25 days 40% restriction), these differences are difficult to explain. The timing of feeding and timing of killing
Search for other papers by Shin-Ichi Kato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katsuyoshi Sato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Haruka Chida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sang-Gun Roh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shyuichi Ohwada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shusuke Sato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Guilloteau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kazuo Katoh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
in groups C and B ( Table 1 ). A standard feeding schedule was applied for both groups. Each animal in both groups received the same amounts of MF (Meiji Feed Co., Tokyo, Japan) and was fed twice daily, at 0830 and 1630 h (2 l each time) with a milk
