A comparison between three commercial kits for chromogranin A measurements
in Journal of EndocrinologySearch for other papers by M Stridsberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B Eriksson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Oberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by ET Janson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Chromogranin (CgA) has been shown to be an excellent marker for neuroendocrine tumours. There are now three commercial assays on the market. We wanted to compare the usefulness of the different kits in a clinical situation. We have thus measured CgA in 77 patients and compared the results from the different methods. CgA was measured with three different commercial kits according to the recommendations from the manufacturers (CGA-RIA CT; CIS bio international, Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France, DAKO Chromogranin A ELISA kit; DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark and CgA; EuroDiagnostica, Malmo, Sweden). The sensitivity and specificity differed between the different kits. The CIS kit showed a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 96%. The sensitivity and specificity were both 85% for the DAKO kit and 93% and 88% respectively for the EuroDiagnostica assay. We have concluded that CgA is an important tumour marker for all neuroendocrine tumours. However, different analytical properties of the respective kits give different performances, a fact that must be taken into consideration when comparing results from different clinical studies. A recognised international standard for CgA would be a step on the way to harmonisation, but antibody selection and construction of the assays will probably still influence the results.
Journal of Endocrinology is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.
The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.
More information is on the Reasons to publish page.
| Sept 2018 onwards | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Text Views | 679 | 181 | 17 |
| PDF Downloads | 240 | 94 | 3 |
Online ISSN: 1479-6805
Print ISSN: 0022-0795
Strengthening biomedical communities
to advance science and health
CONTACT US
Bioscientifica Ltd | Starling House | 1600 Bristol Parkway North | Bristol BS34 8YU | UK
Bioscientifica Ltd | Registered in England no 3190519