Abstract
Signaling pathways of IGF-I and insulin receptors play important roles in the regulation of myocardial function. FOXO1 is a member of the forkhead transcriptional factor family, but how insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling regulate FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes is not well understood. This study was carried out to elucidate how IGF-I and insulin receptor signaling modulate FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes. In cardiomyocytes, activation of IGF-I receptor and insulin receptor lead to rapid phosphorylation of FOXO1. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway suppressed the effect of insulin and IGF-I on FOXO1 phosphorylation. Prolonged incubation with IGF-I increased ubiquitination of FOXO1 and down-regulated the abundance of FOXO1 proteins, which suggested that IGF-I might modulate FOXO1 degradation. To explore whether FOXO1 could modulate IGF-I and insulin signaling, a constitutively active FOXO1 was overexpressed in cardiomyocytes. The abundance of insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor was significantly upregulated in the cells overexpressing active FOXO1, accompanied by increased receptor phosphorylation upon insulin/IGF-I stimulation. Interestingly, overexpression of constitutively active FOXO1 also led to activation of MEK and Akt phosphorylation. IGF-I-stimulated MEK and Akt phosphorylation were augmented byoverexpression of constitutively active FOXO1. These findings indicate bidirectional regulation of insulin/IGF-I receptor signaling and FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes. FOXO1 may provide feedback control through upregulation of insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling.
Introduction
Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and insulin are part of the complex regulatory mechanisms that help to maintain normal myocardial function (Abel 2004, Saetrum & Wang 2005). Signaling pathways of IGF-I receptor and insulin receptor mediate important biological actions in cardiac muscle, such as carbohydrate metabolism, myocyte size, anti-apoptosis signaling, myocytes differentiation, and myogenesis (Abel 2004, Dorn & Force 2005, Saetrum & Wang 2005). Genetic and pharmacological manipulations of IGF-I and insulin receptor signaling lead to abnormal myocardial structure and function in experimental animals, and may alter myocardial survival during myocardial injuries (Abel 2004, Saetrum & Wang 2005). Although recent research advances have brought new understanding of intracellular signaling, regulation of IGF-I and insulin receptor signaling in cardiac muscle is only partially understood. Understanding the mechanisms of insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling in cardiomyocytes will help elucidate how hormonal signaling modulates myocardial function.
Insulin and IGF-I could prevent skeletal muscle cell atrophy and promote myogenesis through forkhead transcription factors (FOXO; Hribal et al. 2003, Sartorelli & Fulco 2004, Stitt et al. 2004). FOXO1 is a member of the forkhead transcriptional factor family that regulates gene expression and thereby modulates cell atrophy and death (Hribal et al. 2003). Ample evidence has shown that the effects of IGF-I and insulin on FOXO are mediated through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) and protein kinase B/Akt (Hribal et al. 2003, Stitt et al. 2004). Upon activation of PI3-K and Akt, IGF-I and insulin suppress FOXO1 by phosphorylating and inactivating its transcriptional regulatory actions (Hribal et al. 2003). In addition, insulin downregulates FOXO1 activity by augmenting ubiquitination of FOXO1 and enhancing FOXO1 degradation (Matsuzaki et al. 2003). These results showed that IGF-I and insulin receptors are upstream regulators of FOXO1, and that FOXO1 is a component of the insulin/IGF-I receptor-signaling pathways. However, whether insulin and IGF-I can modulate FOXO1 in cardiac muscle is not yet known.
In addition to acting as a downstream effector of insulin receptor signaling, members of FOXO transcriptional factor family also participate in feedback control of growth factor signaling. Drosophila forkhead-related transcription factor (dFOXO), a homolog of FOXO1 in metazoans, had been shown to activate insulin receptor transcription in Drosophila (Puig et al. 2003). FOXO3a, another member in the FOXO family, affected growth factor upstream signaling by increasing the phosphorylation of Akt in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (Skurk et al. 2005). These data suggest the existence of a bidirectional regulatory mechanism between growth factor signaling and FOXO transcription factors. Despite the fact that insulin/IGF-I signaling and FOXO1 signaling contribute to the regulation of myocardial structure and function (Abel 2004, Morris et al. 2005, Saetrum & Wang 2005), the cross-talks between IGF-I/insulin receptor signaling and FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes have not been elucidated. Whether FOXO1 can modulate IGF-I receptor is not yet known. In this study, we investigated the relationship between IGF-I/insulin receptor signaling and FOXO1, and observed bidirectional regulation of insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling and FOXO1 in primary cardiomyocytes. IGF-I and insulin regulated FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes as we had anticipated, and FOXO1 provided feedback control of receptor signaling through modulation of IGF-I and insulin receptor ubiquitination.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Anti-FOXO1, anti-α-actinin, anti-actin, and anti-phosphotyrosine (PY99) polyclonal antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biolabs (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-phospho-FOXO1 and other antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Protein A/G PLUS agarose beadswere from Santa Cruz Biolabs andIGF-I was from GroPep (Adelaide, Australia). All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma or Fisher Scientific (Fairlawn, NJ, USA).
Cardiomyocytes culture and transduction of adenoviral constructs
Primary cultures of neonatal cardiomyocytes were prepared from Sprague–Dawley rats according to a protocol as we previously described (Shan et al. 2003). The animal experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of California, Irvine. The construction of recombinant adenovirus with constitutively active FOXO1 and the control adenovirus Ad-SR had been described in previous publications (Hribal et al. 2003, Shan et al. 2003). In this constitutively active FOXO1 mutant, all of its three potential Akt phosphorylation sites have been replaced by nonphosphorylatable amino acids (T24A/S253D/S316A), so that the expressed FOXO1 cannot be phosphorylated and excluded out of the nucleus in response to stimulation. The adenoviruses were replicated in 293 cells, purified by VirakitTM from Virapau (Carlsbad, CA, USA), and the viral titers were determined by plaque assay in 293 cells (Wu et al. 2000). Cardiomyocytes were plated in 100 mm Petri dishes (approximately 80–85% density) and maintained with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. When indicated, the cells were infected with equal amounts of Ad-SR or Ad-FOXO1 and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for the indicated time period.
Immunoblotting
The cells were rinsed once with PBS and lysed with a lysis buffer (137 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 3 μ g/ml aprotinin, 3 μ g/ml leupeptin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 mM NaF, 10 mM NaPP, and 2 mM Na3VO4). Protein concentrations were determined with the Bradford method as we previously described (Shan et al. 2003). Equal amounts of protein from each sample were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and incubated with a blocking buffer (5% nonfat milk in 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature. An alternative blocking buffer containing 2% BSA was used in the experiments involving anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, washed thrice (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20), incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000–1:10 000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature, washed thrice, and then detected with enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL, USA).
Immunoprecipitation
The protein lysates (1000 μ g proteins) were preabsorbed with 20 μ l protein A/G agarose beads at 4 °C for 30 min on a rocking platform and spun for 5 min at 10 000 g, the supernatants were incubated with specific primary antibody at 4 °C overnight (Su et al. 2006). After incubation with 20 μ l protein A/G agarose beads for 1.5 h at 4 °C, the immunocomplexes were collected by centrifugation and washed thrice with ice-cold washing buffer (137 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 2 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, and 2 mM Na3VO4). The final products were briefly boiled and resolved with SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with specific antibodies as indicated.
Statistical analysis
The data were expressed as means ± S.E. based on data derived from multiple independent experiments. The intensity of bands from western blots was scanned with densitometry and digitally analyzed. The statistical significance was tested by Student’s t-test or ANOVA with post hoc analysis when appropriate. A P value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
IGF-I and insulin phosphorylated FOXO1 via PI3-K/Akt signaling in cardiomyocytes
Growth factor receptor signaling can modulate FOXO1 action through modulation of FOXO1 phosphorylation. To define the effects of IGF-I and insulin on FOXO1 phosphorylation, cardiomyocytes were serum-deprived overnight and stimulated with IGF-I or insulin. Anti-phospho-FOXO1 antibodies were used to determine the abundance of FOXO1 phosphorylation by immunoblotting (Fig. 1). IGF-I stimulation phosphorylated FOXO1 as we had anticipated. Time-course experiment showed that IGF-I-stimulated FOXO1 phosphorylation was preceded by the activation of Akt and Erk. Peak phosphorylation of FOXO1 occurred 15–30 min after IGF-I stimulation. Peak activation of Akt and Erk occurred within 5 min of IGF-I stimulation. Dose–response studies showed that IGF-I phosphorylated FOXO1 at a concentration (5 nM) that specifically interacts with IGF-I receptors in cardiomyocytes (Wang et al. 1998).
Insulin stimulation also induced phosphorylation of FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2). The time-course effects of insulin on FOXO1, Akt, and Erk were similar to that of IGF-I. However, insulin stimulation of FOXO1 phosphorylation peaked earlier than IGF-I stimulation. Dose–response study showed that insulin phosphorylated FOXO1 at a concentration (10 nM) specific for the activation of insulin receptors. These experiments indicate that FOXO1 is a downstream step of insulin receptorand IGF-I receptor signaling in cardiomyocytes.
To determine whether IGF-I/insulin stimulation of FOXO1 phosphorylation is downstream from activation of Akt and Erk, chemical inhibitors of PI3-K and MEK were added to the culture media prior to IGF-I/insulin stimulation. PI3-K inhibitor (LY294002) inhibited IGF-I/insulin effect on FOXO1 phosphorylation (Fig. 3), while MEK inhibitor (PD98059) minimally inhibited phosphorylation of FOXO1 by IGF-I/insulin. These findings demonstrated the indispensable role of PI3-K/Akt-signaling pathway in the regulation of FOXO1 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes.
IGF-I downregulated the abundance of FOXO1 and increased ubiquitination of FOXO1
To determine whether IGF-I can modulate the abundance of FOXO1 protein, cardiomyocytes were incubated with vehicles or IGF-I (10 nM) after overnight serum deprivation (Fig. 4). The abundance of FOXO1 remained unchanged in the cardiomyocytes treated with vehicles. However, the content of FOXO1 was decreased by 67% after 18 h of IGF-I treatment (Fig. 4B). These findings suggested that IGF-I may modulate FOXO1 protein turnover. Since ubiquitinated FOXO leads to its proteosomal degradation (Huang et al. 2006), we next studied whether IGF-I can regulate ubiquitination of FOXO1. To this end, cardiomyocytes were treated with vehicle or IGF-I (10 nM) for 20 h, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-ubiquitin monoclonal antibody and immunoblotted with anti-FOXO1 antibody (Fig. 4C). The results showed that IGF-I increased ubiquitination of FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes. Moreover, the effect was inhibited by LY294002, suggesting that the PI3-K/Akt pathway mediated the effect of IGF-I on FOXO1 ubiquitination.
Overexpression of constitutively active FOXO1 upregulated the abundance of IGF-I and insulin receptors and augmented receptor signaling
To explore whether FOXO1 can modulate IGF-I and insulin receptors, cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes were infected with control adenoviral vector or adenoviral vector carrying constitutive FOXO1 (Ad-FOXO1) for 48 h. The abundance of IGF-I and insulin receptors was determined by immunoblotting. The results showed that both insulin and IGF-I receptor proteins were upregulated by approximately 2.5-fold (Fig. 5). To characterize the effects of FOXO1 on IGF-I and insulin receptor signaling, cardiomyocytes were infected with Ad-SR or constitutively active Ad-FOXO1 and then treated with IGF-I (5 nM) or insulin (10 nM; Fig. 6). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with specific antibodies against IGF-I or insulin receptor, and then immunoblotted with anti-phospho-tyrosine antibodies. IGF-I-stimulated autophosphorylation of IGF-I receptor and insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of insulin receptor were respectively enhanced in the cardiomyocytes infected with constitutively active FOXO1. In this experiment, augmentation of IGF-I and insulin receptor autophosphorylation can be explained by the increased receptor abundance in the cells infected with Ad-FOXO1 because the stoichiometry of receptor phosphorylation upon insulin/IGF-I stimulation was not altered (Fig. 6C).
To explore signaling pathways downstream from receptor, activation of MEK and Akt was defined by immunoblotting (Fig. 7). Overexpression of constitutive active FOXO1 increased the basal phosphorylation of MEK and Akt, but the protein abundance of MEK and Akt was not altered. IGF-I-stimulated MEK phosphorylation and Akt phosphorylation were accordingly increased in the cardiomyocytes infected with constitutively active FOXO1. Thus, in addition to its effect on receptor, FOXO1 may modulate downstream signaling steps in cardiomyocytes. These findings suggest a feedback regulatory mechanism between insulin/IGF-I receptor signaling and FOXO1.
Discussion
Our data provided novel evidence for bidirectional regulation of IGF-I/insulin receptor signaling and FOXO1 in cardiac muscle cells. We have demonstrated, for the first time, that FOXO1 can modulate IGF-I receptor signaling in addition to its effect on insulin receptor signaling. IGF-I and insulin are known to regulate FOXO1 (Hribal et al. 2003, Sartorelli & Fulco 2004, Stitt et al. 2004); therefore, we had anticipated that IGF-I and insulin receptor signaling would modulate FOXO1 phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes. The observation that constitutively active FOXO1 upregulated insulin IGF-I receptor and that constitutively active FOXO1 activates MEK and Akt suggest the existence of feedback regulatory mechanisms between FOXO1 and IGF-I/insulin receptor and between FOXO1 and Akt/Erk. Taken together, this study demonstrated elegantly coordinated regulation between upstream insulin/IGF-I receptor signaling and downstream FOXO1 in cardiac muscle cells.
Cardiomyocytes are a good model to study the interplay of insulin/IGF-I receptor signaling and FOXO1. IGF-I and insulin exert pleiotropic actions via overlapping signaling pathways in cardiac muscle cells (Abel 2004, Saetrum & Wang 2005, Taniguchi et al. 2006). In our dose–response experiment, moderate concentration of IGF-I and insulin was able to phosphorylate FOXO1 in cardiomyocytes, indicating that these two peptide hormones independently regulated FOXO1 through its specific receptor. FOXO transcription factor family is part of the IGF-I/insulin-signaling network in mammalian cells (Barthel et al. 2005, Morris et al. 2005). How IGF-I/insulin modulates FOXO transcription factors in cardiomyocytes has rarely been explored in the past. In the present study, we showed that insulin and IGF-I receptor signaling modulated FOXO1 through at least two different mechanisms, by phosphorylating FOXO1 and by downregulating FOXO1 protein. In addition to phosphorylation and ubiquitination, acetylation of FOXO1 in specified sites located in the DNA-binding domain may inhibit FOXO binding to DNA and thereby prevents FOXO-dependent transcription (Perrot & Rechler 2005). Whether insulin/IGF-I can modulate FOXO1 acetylation and FOXO1-dependent gene transcription in cardiac muscle should be explored in future study.
Previous studies had shown that insulin receptor signaling modulated FOXO by phosphorylating FOXO at Ser/Thr residues and hence prevented FOXO translocation from cytoplasmic compartment into nucleus, and downregulated transcription of target genes (Puig et al. 2003). Several groups have shown that FOXO1 is inhibited by insulin through PI3-K pathways (Biggs et al. 1999, Brunet et al. 1999, Guo et al. 1999, Nakae et al. 2001, Arden 2004). FOXO1 regulates expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism and apoptosis (Hall et al. 2000, Barthel et al. 2005). Altering the abundance of FOXO1 could modulate its function. For example, knockdown of FOXO1 expression resulted in more efficient differentiation of myoblasts, and overexpression of FOXO1 increased transcriptional regulatory function (Hall et al. 2000, 2003). Insulin phosphorylation of FOXO1 enhanced ubiquitination of FOXO1 and helped target FOXO1 for degradation (Matsuzaki et al. 2003, Aoki et al. 2004). In our study, IGF-I has similar effects on FOXO1. IGF-I enhanced FOXO1 ubiquitination and reduced FOXO1 abundance in cardiomyocytes. PI3-K pathway played a pivotal role in this process. PI3-K/Akt pathway mediated IGF-I/insulin receptor signaling and mediated the effect of IGF-I/insulin on phosphorylation and ubiquitination of FOXO1. Moreover, FOXO1 can modulate activation of Akt without altering the abundance of Akt protein. Although both insulin and IGF-I modulate FOXO1 phosphorylation via PI3-kinase pathway, our results suggested that insulin phosphorylation of FOXO1 may be less dependent on PI3-kinase than IGF-I (Fig. 3). Whether differences in post-receptor-signaling pathways can explain the effect of insulin and IGF-I on PI3-kinase-dependent phosphorylation of FOXO1 should be clarified in future study.
Insulin and IGF systems do not diverge in Drosophila and share the same prototype insulin-like peptide and its receptors. The existence of a potential feedback control mechanism between FOXO and insulin receptor was first discovered in Drosophila. The Drosophila equivalent of FOXO, dFOXO, transcriptionally activates upstream targets of the insulin-signaling cascade (Puig et al. 2003). Subsequently, it was discovered that dFOXO increased transcription of Drosophila equivalent of insulin receptor gene (Puig et al. 2003). These investigators proposed that this feedback mechanism allowed the cells to regulate growth and metabolism by responding rapidly to changes in nutrients (Puig et al. 2003). When nutrients are abundant, activation of the dInR pathway will inactivate dFOXO and hence downregulate dInR transcription. Under situations in which nutrients are limiting, the dInR signaling diminishes and frees dFOXO to upregulate dInR. Puig et al.(2003) further hypothesized that upregulation of dInR by dFOXO will prepare the flies for growth when nutrients become abundant.
With evolution, the prototype insulin/insulin receptor system developed into specialized insulin and IGF-I systems to coordinate regulation of metabolism and growth in mammals (LeRoith et al. 1993, Upton et al. 1998). Mammalian regulation of metabolism and growth is considerably more complicated than Drosophila, and transcriptional regulatory changes of insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor in mammalian cells do not necessarily synchronize with each other. However, identifying a signaling protein (FOXO1) that serves as a common downstream step of receptor signaling and a common point of feedback regulation of receptor signaling for both insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor entails the evolutional relationship of these two receptor signaling systems. The interplay between insulin/IGF-I receptor, Akt and Erk signaling, and FOXO1 may provide a new paradigm to understand how insulin and IGF-I modulate cardiac muscle structure and function.
This work is supported by a grant from NHLBI (to P H W). The authors wish to thank Dr Domenico Accili (Columbia University, NY, USA) for providing adenovirus constructs. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.
References
Abel ED 2004 Insulin signaling in heart muscle: lessons from genetically engineered mouse models. Current Hypertension Reports 6 416–423.
Aoki M, Jiang H & Vogt PK 2004 Proteasomal degradation of the FoxO1 transcriptional regulator in cells transformed by the P3k and Akt oncoproteins. PNAS 101 13613–13617.
Arden KC 2004 FoxO: linking new signaling pathways. Molecular Cell 14 416–418.
Barthel A, Schmoll D & Unterman TG 2005 FoxO proteins in insulin action and metabolism. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 16 183–189.
Biggs WH III, Meisenhelder J, Hunter T, Cavenee WK & Arden KC 1999 Protein kinase B/Akt-mediated phosphorylation promotes nuclear exclusion of the winged helix transcription factor FKHR1. PNAS 96 7421–7426.
Brunet A, Bonni A, ZigmondMJ, Lin MZ, Juo P, Hu LS, Anderson MJ, Arden KC, Blenis J & Greenberg ME 1999 Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 96 857–868.
Dorn GW & Force T 2005 Protein kinase cascades in the regulation of cardiac hypertrophy. Journal of Clinical Investigation 115 527–537.
Guo S, Rena G, Cichy S, He X, Cohen P & Unterman T 1999 Phosphorylation of serine 256 by protein kinase B disrupts transactivation by FKHR and mediates effects of insulin on insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 promoter activity through a conserved insulin response sequence. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274 17184–17192.
Hall RK, Yamasaki T, Kucera T, Waltner-Law M, O’Brien R & Granner DK 2000 Regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 gene expression by insulin. The role of winged helix/forkhead proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 30169–30175.
Hribal ML, Nakae J, Kitamura T, Shutter JR & Accili D 2003 Regulation of insulin-like growth factor-dependent myoblast differentiation by Foxo forkhead transcription factors. Journal of Cell Biology 162 535–541.
Huang HY, Kang HY, Li CF, Eng HL, Chou SC, Lin CN & Hsiung CY 2006 Skp2 overexpression is highly representative of intrinsic biological aggressiveness and independently associated with poor prognosis in primary localized myxofibrosarcomas. Clinical Cancer Research 12 487–498.
LeRoith D, Kavsan VM, Koval AP & Roberts CT Jr. 1993 Phylogeny of the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and receptors: a molecular approach. Molecular Reproduction and Development 35 332–336.
Matsuzaki H, Daitoku H, Hatta M, Tanaka K & Fukamizu A 2003 Insulin-induced phosphorylation of FKHR (Foxo1) targets to proteasomal degradation. PNAS 100 11285–11290.
Morris JB, Kenney B, Huynh H & Woodcock EA 2005 Regulation of the proapoptotic factor FOXO1 (FKHR) in cardiomyocytes by growth factors and alpha1-adrenergic agonists. Endocrinology 146 4370–4376.
Nakae J, Kitamura T, Ogawa W, Kasuga M & Accili D 2001 Insulin regulation of gene expression through the forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 (Fkhr) requires kinases distinct from Akt. Biochemistry 40 11768–11776.
Perrot V & Rechler MM 2005 The coactivator p300 directly acetylates the forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 and stimulates Foxo1-induced transcription. Molecular Endocrinology 19 2283–2298.
Puig O, Marr MT, Ruhf ML & Tjian R 2003 Control of cell number by Drosophila FOXO: downstream and feedback regulation of the insulin receptor pathway. Genes and Development 17 2006–2020.
Saetrum OO & Wang PH 2005 IGF-I is a matter of heart. Growth Hormone and IGF Research 15 89–94.
Sartorelli V & Fulco M 2004 Molecular and cellular determinants of skeletal muscle atrophy and hypertrophy. Science’s STKE 2004 re11.
Shan YX, Yang TL, Mestril R & Wang PH 2003 Hsp10 and Hsp60 suppress ubiquitination of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and augment insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor signaling in cardiac muscle: implications on decreased myocardial protection in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278 45492–45498.
Skurk C, Izumiya Y, Maatz H, Razeghi P, Shiojima I, Sandri M, Sato K, Zeng L, Schiekofer S, Pimentel D et al.2005 The FOXO3a transcription factor regulates cardiac myocyte size downstream of AKT signaling. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280 20814–20823.
Stitt TN, Drujan D, Clarke BA, Panaro F, Timofeyva Y, Kline WO, Gonzalez M, Yancopoulos GD & Glass DJ 2004 The IGF-1/PI3-K/Akt pathway prevents expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Molecular Cell 14 395–403.
Su HF, Samsamshariat A, Fu J, Shan YX, Chen YH, Piomelli D & WangPH 2006 Oleylethanolamide activates Ras-Erk pathway and improves myocardial function in doxorubicin-induced heart failure. Endocrinology 147 827–834.
Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B & Kahn CR 2006 Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 7 85–96.
Upton Z, Yandell CA, Degger BG, Chan SJ, Moriyama S, Francis GL & Ballard FJ 1998 Evolution of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) action: in vitro characterization of vertebrate IGF-I proteins. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part B, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 121 35–41.
Wang L, Ma W, Markovich R, Chen JW & Wang PH 1998 Regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptotic signaling by insulin-like growth factor I. Circulation Research 83 516–522.
Wu W, Lee WL, Wu YY, Chen D, Liu TJ, Jang A, Sharma PM & Wang PH 2000 Expression of constitutively active phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibits activation of caspase 3 and apoptosis of cardiac muscle cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275 40113–40119.