Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) leads to bone fragility and predisposes to increased risk of fracture, poor bone healing and other skeletal complications. In addition, some anti-diabetic therapies for T2DM can have notable detrimental skeletal effects. Thus, an appropriate therapeutic strategy for T2DM should not only be effective in re-establishing good glycaemic control but also in minimising skeletal complications. There is increasing evidence that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), now greatly prescribed for the treatment of T2DM, have beneficial skeletal effects although the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. This review provides an overview of the direct and indirect effects of GLP-1RAs on bone physiology, focusing on bone quality and novel mechanisms of action on the vasculature and hormonal regulation. The overall experimental studies indicate significant positive skeletal effects of GLP-1RAs on bone quality and strength although their mechanisms of actions may differ according to various GLP-1RAs and clinical studies supporting their bone protective effects are still lacking. The possibility that GLP-1RAs could improve blood supply to bone, which is essential for skeletal health, is of major interest and suggests that GLP-1 anti-diabetic therapy could benefit the rising number of elderly T2DM patients with osteoporosis and high fracture risk.
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease that progresses worldwide at alarming rates. For instance, in 2013, it has been estimated that DM affected 382 million individuals (Federation 2013). Projections for 2035 indicate a global burden of 55% to reach up to 592 million individuals (Federation 2013). Associated complications are commonly cardiovascular events, nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy and bone fragility that dampen the quality of life of affected individuals.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is by far the most common form of DM and is characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia mostly caused by insulin resistance (IR) in peripheral tissues such as the liver and muscle. The aetiology of bone fragility in T2DM is unclear. Indeed, bone mineral density is normal or slightly elevated in T2DM despite an increased risk of femoral neck fracture, suggesting alterations of bone ‘quality’ rather than bone mass (Vestergaard et al. 2005, Schwartz et al. 2011, Napoli et al. 2017). Bone quality is an umbrella term that regroups factors such as bone microarchitectures, tissue material properties and bone toughness (Chappard et al. 2011). Another important contributor for bone fracture is represented by an increased risk in falls in this population (Schwartz et al. 2002, 2008). At the cellular and molecular levels, T2DM is characterised by a reduction in bone turnover suggesting modifications of bone cell behaviours (Vestergaard 2007). Furthermore, low testosterone and vitamin D levels, and high plasma sclerostin, are common features observed in T2DM patients (Sellmeyer et al. 2016).
Current treatment options of T2DM rely on lifestyle intervention and oral or injectable drugs, when needed, to reach an HbA1C level of 7% or less. Among the most prescribed drugs, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have recently attracted attention as Glp-1r-knockout animals, and GLP-1-supplemented animals exhibited modifications of bone strength and quality as described below.
Endogenously, GLP-1 is produced by post-translational processing of the glucagon gene in enteroendocrine cells, mainly L-cells (Habib et al. 2012). Two forms of GLP-1 are produced in the intestine, GLP-17-36NH2 and GLP-17-37 although the major circulating form is GLP-17-36NH2 (Orskov et al. 1994). L-cells are an open type endocrine cells highly polarised with secretory granules at their basolateral pole ready to be released in the capillary network running through the lamina propria. This secretion is regulated by intraluminal contents, neural stimuli and hormones (Baggio & Drucker 2007). Beyond its endocrine mode of action, GLP-1 has also been suspected to act via the autonomous nervous system and hypothalamic and brainstem nuclei (Holst & Deacon 2005).
To act, GLP-1 engages its receptor; the GLP-1r that is coded by the human GLP1R gene comprising 13 exons that span approximately 13.8 kb (Yamada et al. 1995) and localised on chromosome 6p21 (Gremlich et al. 1995). The GLP-1r is expressed in the endocrine pancreas, gastro-intestinal tract, lung, heart, kidney and several regions of the brain (Baggio & Drucker 2007). Recent evidences also suggest that GLP-1 can bind in specific circumstances to the glucagon receptor (Weston et al. 2015). The principal physiological role of GLP-1 is to potentiate glucose-dependent insulin secretion (McIntosh et al. 2010). Extrapancreatic actions of GLP-1 results in the reduction of food intake through the CNS, inhibition of gastric emptying, positive actions on the cardiovascular system and a role in energy expenditure (McIntosh et al. 2010).
GLP-1RAs are GLP-1 with extended half-life to be more resistant to degradation by the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme. Several molecules listed in Table 1 have been developed by the pharmaceutical industry and now been approved for the treatment of T2DM. The aim of the present review is to provide the reader with a comprehensive analysis of the effects of GLP-1RAs on bone physiology with special focuses on the mode of action including effects on bone quality, blood flow to bone and on the hormonal regulation of bone metabolism.
Summary of approved GLP-1RAs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Active compound | Drug name | Marketed by | Approved in | Approved dose range |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exenatide (or Exendin-4) | Byetta | Astra Zeneca AB | 2006 | 5–10 µg twice daily |
Liraglutide | Victoza | Novo Nordisk A/S | 2009 | 0.6–1.8 mg once daily |
Lixisenatide | Lyxumia | Sanofi Aventis Groupe | 2013 | 10–20 µg once daily |
Exenatide (or Exendin-4) long acting release | Bydureon | Astra Zeneca AB | 2011 | 2 mg once weekly |
Albiglutide | Eperzan | GlaxoSmithKline Trading Services Ltd | 2014 | 30–50 mg once weekly |
Dulaglutide | Trulicity | Eli Lilly Nederland B.V. | 2014 | 0.75–1.5 mg once weekly |
Pathogenesis of bone fragility in diabetes
As mentioned in the introduction section, the aetiology of diabetes seems linked to bone quality rather than bone quantity. As such, it is important to understand what alterations of bone tissue are observed in T2DM individuals.
Alterations in bone microarchitecture and bone material properties
Often, the assessment of bone microarchitecture and material properties require the use of bone biopsy as a source of bone tissue for experimental investigation. However, such biopsies are not available and microarchitecture and material properties have been investigated in humans by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and bone microindentation. In terms of bone microarchitecture, most studies tend to indicate a preserved trabecular bone microarchitecture but an increase in cortical bone porosity in diabetic individuals with or without fracture (Burghardt et al. 2010, Patsch et al. 2013, Farr et al. 2014). A limitation of HR-pQCT is that it can only be performed at peripheral skeletal sites and may not reflect the full bone phenotype.
In terms of bone material properties, the use of the OsteoProbe bone microindentation device showed that postmenopausal women with T2DM had significantly lower bone material strength index (BMSi) as compared to age- and sex-matched postmenopausal women without diabetes, suggesting altered bone material properties (Farr et al. 2014).
Advanced glycation endproducts
Prolonged hyperglycaemia leads to the formation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in the bone matrix that can impair its mechanical properties and the behaviour of bone cells. The most studied AGEs in humans are pentosidine because of its easiness to be measured in clinical samples such as blood or urine. As such, serum and urine pentosidine levels have been correlated with clinical fractures in T2DM patients (Yamamoto et al. 2008, Schwartz et al. 2009). However, further work is required to determine the extent to which circulating levels of AGEs reflect those in human bone tissue.
Bone turnover markers and circulating sclerostin levels
Multiple studies in humans have found that serum markers of bone formation and resorption are reduced in diabetic individuals vs non-diabetic controls (Krakauer et al. 1995, Gerdhem et al. 2005, Dobnig et al. 2006, Shu et al. 2012). In contrast, circulating levels of sclerostin have reported to be higher in diabetic individuals (Garcia-Martin et al. 2012, Gaudio et al. 2012, Gennari et al. 2012) and with regards to sclerostin’s potent inhibitory action on bone formation, this may exacerbate the low bone formation phenotype in those patients. As such, long-standing low bone turnover observed in diabetes may result in a defective microdamage repair and increased bone microcrack accumulation that can further contribute to the observed fracture risk. Enzymatic cross-linking of type I collagen by lysyl oxidase is reduced in diabetes (Saito et al. 2006, Khosravi et al. 2014). As circulating markers of bone resorption are based on cross-linked fragments of type I collagen, it is possible that bone resorption is underestimated in diabetes.
Skeletal effects of GLP-1RAs: direct and/or indirect mechanisms of action
Clinical studies
Clinical data on the skeletal effects of GLP-1RAs are scarce. Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density have been assessed in T2DM patients treated with exenatide and liraglutide. However, all these studies reported no effects of GLP-1RA treatment on circulating bone markers or bone mineral density (Bunck et al. 2011, Li et al. 2015, Gilbert et al. 2016). Interestingly, the effects of liraglutide administration on bone turnover markers have been reported not in diabetic but in the obese population for the weight-loss action of liraglutide. In that study, bone formation was improved as indicated by higher values for N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen reported in the liraglutide arm, but no effects on bone resorption were observed (Iepsen et al. 2015).
Two meta-analyses have also been performed on the use of GLP-1RAs and the possible effects of these medications on fracture risk. They showed divergent effects on bone fractures and differences among GLP-1RAs. It was demonstrated that liraglutide significantly reduced the risk of bone fractures, whereas exenatide treatment was associated with an elevated risk of incident bone fractures (Su et al. 2015). The other meta-analysis however found neutral effect of both liraglutide and exenatide as compared with other anti-diabetic medications (Mabilleau et al. 2014). Interestingly, Driessen and coworkers investigated in the British and Danish populations the incidence of bone fracture in GLP-1RA takers as compared with non-takers (Driessen et al. 2015a ,b ). No significant difference was observed, and they suggested that the effect of both GLP-1RA-type was neutral in the human diabetic population.
However, interpretation of the above clinical studies and meta-analyses/observational studies should be done carefully as they have some limitations:
-
Bone fractures were not the principal end points and as such are often disclosed as a serious adverse event, although this represents only a fraction of all fractures;
-
There is a lack of information on bone status (bone mineral density, microarchitecture, bone quality) and calcium and phosphorus metabolism at baseline and at the end of studies that could highlight the possible action of GLP-1RAs on bone strength;
-
The duration of studies may not be long enough to allow for improvement in bone quality independently of bone turnover markers;
-
The incidence of GLP-1RAs on falls, and hence, a possible mechanism of action to reduce fracture, is very scarce.
Furthermore, as discussed below, a reduction in bone fracture has been evidenced with DPP-4 inhibitors (Monami et al. 2011). However, several differences exist between DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs. First, GLP-1RAs induce a modest weight loss whilst DPP-4 inhibitors are neutral on that aspect (Amori et al. 2007, Inzucchi et al. 2012). After the age of 50 years, weight loss is associated with an increased risk of fracture in overweight and obese individuals (Jensen et al. 1994, Langlois et al. 2001). Secondly, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events with GLP-1RAs are nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea, and it is plausible that they result in malabsorption of mineral and nutrients, negatively affecting bone physiology.
In clinical trials, GLP-1RAs have been effective in reducing HbA1c level and hence chronic hyperglycaemia. Data on AGEs and pentosidine in response to GLP-1RAs on the other hand are limited. Tanaka and coworkers demonstrated that despite evident action of liraglutide in reducing circulating glucose in Japanese overweight/obese patients with T2DM, the effects of such molecule on circulating pentosidine were null (Tanaka et al. 2015a ).
Effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on the skeleton
The other class of pharmacotherapeutic agents that uses the incretin system are DPP-4 inhibitors, which inhibit the principal enzyme responsible for the degradation of endogenous GLP-1. By decreasing clearance of GLP-1, concentrations of active GLP-1 are increased by 2- to 3-fold, resulting in a lowering of fasting and postprandial glucose concentrations.
Data regarding the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on human skeletal health are quite scarce. A meta-analysis carried out on 28 trials suggests a reduced fracture risk with DPP-4 inhibitors, dependent on the treatment duration (Monami et al. 2011). However, not all studies are showing a positive effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on fracture risk, BMD and bone turnover (Monami et al. 2011, Driessen et al. 2014). Recent preclinical studies showed protective effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on the skeleton of diabetic rats (Glorie et al. 2014, Eom et al. 2016) while others have shown no effect (Gallagher et al. 2014). In vitro studies have also indicated neutral effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on bone formation (Gallagher et al. 2014). Therefore, DPP4 inhibitors could have a possible protective effect mediated by an increase of the circulating concentrations of GLP-1 or no adverse effect. Overall, although the interest in this new anti-diabetic treatment effect on bone is high, unfortunately to date, data on DPP-4 inhibitors do not allow the stating of recommendations.
Experimental studies
The first understanding of GLP-1 actions in skeletal physiology arises from Glp1-r KO mouse. At 10 weeks of age, these mice exhibited a small reduction in bone mass associated with an increased number of osteoclasts and eroded surfaces (Yamada et al. 2008). On the other hand, the mineral apposition and bone formation rates appeared unaffected by GLP-1r inactivation (Yamada et al. 2008). Similarly, observations in the same KO model at 16 weeks of age and in the double incretin receptor knockout model at 26 weeks of age corroborated these findings (Mieczkowska et al. 2015, Mabilleau 2017). Taken together, these results suggested a control of bone resorption (osteoclast differentiation and/or action) by the GLP-1r. According to the literature, this effect on resorption seems to be indirect through a reduction in calcitonin gene expression in GLP-1r-deficient animals (Yamada et al. 2008) but further evidences are warranted.
While it is well established that GLP-1RAs increase bone mass in rodents (see paragraph 4), previous investigations of their effects on bone turnover are conflicting. It has been reported that 3 μg/kg/day and 4.2 μg/kg/day exenatide induced bone formation by osteoblast activation in old ovariectomised (OVX) rats (Ma et al. 2013) and in hindlimb-unloading rats (Meng et al. 2016) by promoting the osteogenic differentiation and inhibiting BMSC adipogenic differentiation. A decrease of osteoclastic surfaces was also observed (Ma et al. 2013). In contrast, we found no effect of both 10 μg/kg/day exenatide and 0.3 mg/kg/day liraglutide on bone formation and mineralisation rates in OVX mice and a slight increase of osteoclastic surfaces with the drug using bone histomorphometry (Pereira et al. 2015). The reasons for those discrepancies are unclear and may involve differences in bone turnover in mice and rats and/or in the duration of GLP-1RA treatment. Interestingly, our recent unpublished data demonstrate that GLP-1RAs increase bone formation in a T2DM mouse model but not in lean control mice, suggesting that glucose levels and/or low bone turnover may also influence the skeletal effects of GLP-1RAs. It is possible that the efficacy of GLP-1RAs on the skeleton may be improved in situations where there is a disproportionate reduction in bone formation as compared with resorption such as in T2DM.
In vitro studies
While several studies have reported that GLP-1RAs could have beneficial effects on the skeleton, the downstream molecular mechanisms underlying this osteogenic effect have not been identified (Bjarnason et al. 2002, Clowes et al. 2002). It is indeed unclear whether the mechanism of action of GLP-1RAs in bone is direct, through a functional GLP-1r expressed by bone cells, or indirect, via an increase in calcitonin production by the thyroid C-cells which inhibits bone resorption (Yamada et al. 2008). Furthermore, the presence and the identity of the GLP-1r in bone were controversial until recently and thus the basis for direct skeletal effects of GLP-1 has not been established.
We recently demonstrated that GLP-1 might directly affect bone cells via a GLP-1r identified in primary mouse osteoblasts isolated from calvaria and bone marrow-derived osteoclasts (Pereira et al. 2015), and this was confirmed in situ using a GLP-1r antibody (Abcam). Similarly, other studies showed that mouse osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 cells express a functional receptor for GLP-1 (Aoyama et al. 2014). In contrast, expression of the pancreatic-type GLP-1r mRNA was identified in human osteoblastic cell lines deriving from osteosarcomas, but its expression was dependent on the stage of osteoblastic development (Pacheco-Pantoja et al. 2011). However, other study failed to demonstrate the presence of GLP-1r at the mRNA level in primary murine osteoblasts or osteoclasts (Mabilleau et al. 2013). Similarly, the presence of the pancreatic GLP-1r in osteocytic cells was controversial as it has been reported in some cell lines, but not all (Kim et al. 2013, Pereira et al. 2015), as well as in osteocytes in rat femurs (Kim et al. 2013).
The presence of GLP-1r in bone cells in vitro and in situ implies that GLP-1RAs could have direct effects on bone cells. A study has indeed identified potential skeletal beneficial effects of 10 nM of exenatide by promoting osteoblastogenesis and restraining adipogenesis through a β-catenin pathway, during bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMMSC) differentiation (Meng et al. 2016). Despite increased osteoblastogenesis, no direct effect of GLP-1RAs on bone nodule mineralisation in vitro was shown with up to 100 nM of exenatide and 1000 nM of liraglutide (Ma et al. 2013, Pereira et al. 2015). It is well established that exposure of primary osteoblast cells to high glucose levels inhibits in vitro bone nodule formation (Balint et al. 2001, Pereira et al. 2017). Interestingly, despite no effect of exenatide on bone formation in normal glucose conditions, unpublished results from our group demonstrate that it can reduce the deleterious effect of glucose on bone formation in vitro, in a dose-dependent manner. This could be due to upregulated GLP-1r expression in high glucose conditions, which could in turn magnify the effect of GLP-1RAs (Aoyama et al. 2014). Regarding the effects of GLP-1RAs on osteoclastogenesis in vitro, we showed that both liraglutide and exenatide increased osteoclastogenesis, while decreasing the area resorbed per osteoclast, suggesting that GLP-1RAs stimulate osteoclastic differentiation but impair their resorptive activity (Pereira et al. 2015).
GLP-1RA effects on the balance between adipogenesis and osteogenesis and adipocytes
BMMSCs have the ability to differentiate into various cell types, including osteoblasts and adipocytes and can be targeted by anti-diabetic drugs (e.g. thiazolidinedione). Considering the reciprocal relationship between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, GLP1-RAs may also indirectly affect bone formation by modulating adipogenesis. Several previous in vitro studies have indeed shown that GLP-1 stimulates adipose-derived stem cells (Cantini et al. 2015, Lee et al. 2015) and BMMSC (Lu et al. 2015) towards osteoblast differentiation, whereas it inhibits adipocytic differentiation. Furthermore, the GLP-1R is expressed by adipocytes and GLP-1RAs downregulate adipogenic/lipogenic genes on adipose tissue explants and cultured adipocytes while increasing lipolytic markers and expression of adiponectin (Cantini et al. 2015, El Bekay et al. 2016, Wang et al. 2017). While skeletal effects of adiponectin are multi-faceted and not always concordant, it was suggested that it may be a negative regulator of bone metabolism (Naot et al. 2017), adding to the complexity of the indirect effects of GLP-1RAs on the skeleton. Adipocyte accumulation in the bone marrow during ageing and obesity was recently shown to inhibit bone healing in mice, and this was reversed by DPP-4 inhibitors, suggesting that targeting adipocytes with GLP-1RAs may also have beneficial effects on skeletal health (Ambrosi et al. 2017).
Potential signalling mechanisms of GLP-1 in bone
GLP-1RA binding to the classical pancreatic GLP-1r activates the main (cAMP-PKA) and alternative phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) downstream signalling pathways. While it is still unclear whether GLP-1RAs’ skeletal effects are direct via a GLP-1r expressed in bone or indirect, Cantini and coworkers suggested that in tissues other than pancreas, GLP-1 and GLP-1RAs may not exert their actions through the classical GLP-1r but via unknown alternative pathways. This was observed in cardiomyocytes, liver and muscles (Cantini et al. 2016).
Similarly, GLP-1 action in bone could be mediated by a receptor different from the classical pancreatic cAMP-linked GLP-1r. In fact, Nuche-Berenguer and coworkers (72) identified in a mouse osteoblastic line a receptor different from the pancreatic cAMP-linked GLP-1r. Moreover, they showed that GLP-1 binding to this different receptor induced an immediate hydrolysis of glycosylphosphatidylinositols, generating inositolphosphate glycan and activating PI3K and MAPK, without affecting cAMP/PKA classical signalling (Nuche-Berenguer et al. 2010b ). Thus, the hypothesis of an indirect action of GLP-1RAs cannot be excluded.
GLP-1RAs and bone quality
Unfortunately, as neither peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) nor iliac crest bone biopsy are part of the usual care in diabetic clinical trials, human data on the effects of GLP-1RAs on all aspects of bone quality are presently missing. As such, the following summary of action of GLP-1RA is based on pre-clinical data obtained in animal models. Several animal models of either osteoporosis or T2DM have been used to assess the effects of two GLP-1RAs, exenatide and liraglutide, on bone quality and strength. However, data concerning potential bone effects of other GLP-1RAs, and especially those administered once weekly, are currently missing. Mice presenting a deletion of GLP-1r have also been generated and represented a suitable model to investigate the role of the GLP-1/GLP-r pathway in bone.
Effects of GLP-1RAs on bone strength
Our knowledge of the effects of the GLP-1/GLP-1r pathway on bone strength has been markedly improved by the use of Glp-1r KO mice. Indeed, although these animals are not diabetic, they exhibited a significant reduction in bone strength represented by lower ultimate load and stiffness (Mabilleau et al. 2013). Bone strength in response to the GLP-1RA exenatide has also been investigated in osteoporotic animal models generated either by ovariectomy or disuse. In ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis, the use of exenatide at a concentration as low as 1 µg/kg/day for 16 weeks, led to improvement in maximum load and stiffness as well as Young’s modulus and ultimate stress, suggesting amelioration in bone microarchitecture and/or tissue material properties (Ma et al. 2013). In the rat tail suspension model, the administration of exenatide (4.2 µg/kg/day) for 4 weeks resulted in higher value for maximum loading, stiffness, stress and Young’s modulus, suggesting here again ameliorations in bone microarchitecture and/or tissue material properties (Meng et al. 2016). However, bone strength has not been measured after treatment with liraglutide.
Effects of GLP-1RAs on bone microarchitecture
In Glp-1r KO animals, unpublished observations from our group, revealed that these animals presented with a reduction in cancellous bone volume associated with lower trabeculae numbers and higher trabecular spacing. These data have been confirmed by the elegant study of Yamada and coworkers who reported a significant reduction in cancellous bone mineral density in the same transgenic animal model (Yamada et al. 2008). Alterations of cortical bone in this mouse model were also evidenced with lower outer bone diameter and cortical thickness (Mabilleau et al. 2013). Exenatide and liraglutide have been used as a treatment option in pre-clinical animal models of osteoporosis. They demonstrated positive effects on trabecular bone microarchitecture in the axial and appendicular skeleton evidenced by amelioration of structural parameters in lumbar vertebra and long bones as early as 4-week treatment. Indeed, both liraglutide and exenatide treatments resulted in higher bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) values (24%–148%, depending on dose and treatment duration) and higher values for trabecular number (Tb.N), thickness (Tb.Th) and reduction in separation (Tb.Sp) (Ma et al. 2013, Lu et al. 2015, Pereira et al. 2015, Meng et al. 2016, Sun et al. 2016). When comparing the effects of both GLP-1RAs, liraglutide (0.3 mg/kg/day) was more potent than exenatide (10 µg/kg/day) (Pereira et al. 2015). The effects of GLP-1RAs on cortical microarchitecture were only observed after a minimum of 8-week treatment with exenatide or liraglutide, but highlighted the significant increases in cortical thickness with 20 µg/kg/day of exenatide or 0.6 mg/kg/day of liraglutide (Lu et al. 2015, Sun et al. 2016).
In opposition to what is commonly observed in humans, animal models of T2DM exhibit significant alteration of trabecular and cortical microarchitectures. The effects of GLP-1RAs in diabetic animal models have also been reported. The use of exenatide at a regimen of 10 µg/kg/day for 3 days in T2DM animals resulted in an improvement in trabecular microarchitecture at the femur and lumbar spine (Nuche-Berenguer et al. 2010a , 2011). The use of liraglutide was also investigated in the Goto-Kakizaki T2DM rat model at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks. This regimen led to significant improvement in trabecular and cortical bone microarchitectures in the femur and lumbar vertebra (Sun et al. 2015).
The effects of liraglutide on bone microarchitecture have also been investigated in a T1DM mouse model. In this study, the administration of 0.093 mg/kg/day liraglutide for 3 weeks did not demonstrate ameliorations of neither trabecular nor cortical microarchitectures (Mansur et al. 2015).
Effects of GLP-1RAs on tissue material properties
With respect to the improvement in bone strength and intrinsic properties (Young’s modulus, stress), that are independent of the bone architecture, one could suspect an action of GLP-1RA on tissue material properties. However, very little information has been reported. Tissue material properties represent a set of parameters that describe the modification of biochemical composition or organisation of the bone matrix at the molecular and nanoscale levels (Chappard et al. 2011). This encompasses for a thorough assessment of the mineral and collagen compartments. Most of our knowledge on the action of GLP-1 on tissue material properties is based on Glp1r KO mice. Indeed, in these animals, a significant reduction in enzymatic collagen cross-linking has been evidenced and associated with alteration of bone strength at the tissue level (Mabilleau et al. 2013). However, in opposition to what has been seen with the sister incretin hormone GIP, Glp-1r deletion did not alter the mineral compartment (Mieczkowska et al. 2013). Data regarding the potential effects of GLP-1RAs on tissue material properties in osteoporotic animals are lacking. However, an elegant study conducted by Mansur and coworkers investigated the effects of 0.093 mg/kg/day liraglutide over a period of 3 weeks in a T1DM mouse model (Mansur et al. 2015). These authors reported no amelioration of enzymatic collagen cross-linking or collagen glycation but an unexpected reduction in collagen destruction (Mansur et al. 2015).
GLP-1RAs and blood flow to bone
Diabetes leads to poor circulation and vascular diseases are the principal causes of death and disability in people with diabetes. Consequently, wound and fracture healing are delayed in diabetic patients, one of the main reasons being the impairment in vascularisation (Loder 1988, Falanga 2005). Particularly, diabetes was shown to induce a decrease in endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) that are important for angiogenesis and vascular repair (Fadini et al. 2005, Rigato et al. 2015). It is now well established that blood flow is crucial to bone vascular function and osteogenesis (Ramasamy et al. 2016) and that disrupted blood supply to bone is associated with reduced bone mass, osteonecrosis and impaired bone regeneration (Loder 1988, Atsumi & Kuroki 1992, Vogt et al. 1997). Very little work has however examined whether the bone vasculature and bone blood flow are reduced in diabetic bone and if it is possible to restore them with the use of anti-diabetic drugs. Fajardo (Fajardo 2017) recently reviewed the literature regarding the microvascular complications in diabetic bone but evidences are still lacking to support the link between skeletal fragility in diabetes and those vascular complications.
Incretin-based therapy seems very promising for the prevention of diabetic vascular complications (Mima 2016). The potential for GLP-1RAs to enhance vascular function has been demonstrated in several studies (Nystrom et al. 2004, Smits et al. 2015, Sufiun et al. 2015 Zhou et al. 2015). The improvement of vascular endothelial function restores impaired glucose tolerance by ameliorating insulin resistance in skeletal muscle (Kubota et al. 2011). Interestingly, two-week administration of 0.5 μg/kg/day exenatide was shown to accelerate diabetic wound healing by increasing angiogenesis in the wound and the number of circulating EPCs (Roan et al. 2017). Our recent, not yet published, work also demonstrates that 10 µg/kg exenatide can have beneficial effects on bone vascularisation in diabetic bone by acutely increasing blood flow to bone in db/db mice. This suggests that the increased bone formation induced by exenatide treatment in diabetic mice could be attributed in part to this increased skeletal perfusion. No study has yet examined the effect of liraglutide on bone blood flow. More work is therefore needed to examine whether skeletal perfusion is linked to bone formation in diabetic bone and if GLP-1RAs could be used as treatment to increase vascularisation in diabetic patients with poor fracture healing.
GLP-1RAs and hormones that regulate bone metabolism
A major breakthrough in the bone research field has been the finding that bone is an endocrine organ that can affect other organs via the release of hormones such as osteocalcin and sclerostin. There are increasing reports showing that GLP-1RAs can affect the release of these hormones by bone cells in vitro and in animal models but the clinical evidence is however still very scarce.
Sclerostin
The discovery of the importance of the Wnt/β catenin pathway for bone formation has led to extensive work examining the function of sclerostin in bone. Sclerostin is a product of the SOST gene expressed mainly by osteocytes, which is secreted and acts as a potent antagonist of Wnt signalling (Bellido 2014). Its deficiency or its pharmacological neutralisation increases bone formation, making it a potential target for treatment of bone diseases associated with bone loss, such as osteoporosis (Ominsky et al. 2010, Hamann et al. 2013). Most studies have shown that serum sclerostin levels are elevated in diabetic patients, suggesting that sclerostin could contribute to the decreased bone formation observed in diabetic patients (Garcia-Martin et al. 2012, Gaudio et al. 2012, Gennari et al. 2012). However, the association between sclerostin levels and increased fracture risk in T2DM patients is not always conclusive and further studies are required to confirm the link (Yu et al. 2017). Some differences in serum sclerostin levels measurements could be explained by the fact that sclerostin could be derived from other non-skeletal sources so that serum levels may not always reflect the production in bone (Roforth et al. 2014) and also because the ELISA kits for sclerostin measurements were found to lack accuracy (Piec et al. 2016, Costa et al. 2017).
To address this issue, experimental studies were conducted examining if sclerostin production by osteocytes is modified in bone of diabetic rodents or in vitro when osteocytes are cultured in high glucose levels. Although an in vitro study reported an increased production of sclerostin by osteocyte-like cell line when cultured in hyperglycaemia (Tanaka et al. 2015b , Pereira et al. 2016), our recent study shows that the impaired bone microarchitecture and cellular turnover associated with T2DM-like conditions in diabetic ZDF rats are not correlated with changes in serum sclerostin levels, bone sclerostin expression or osteocyte viability (Pereira et al. 2017). On the other hand, high fat diet in mice resulted in increased serum sclerostin and dramatic alterations of osteocyte network organisation (Mabilleau et al. 2016).
Few studies have investigated if GLP-1RAs could affect sclerostin production by osteocytes. Although GLP-1r is mainly expressed by immature osteoblasts, it can be present in osteocytes where it co-localises with sclerostin (Kim et al. 2013), suggesting that GLP-1RAs may affect sclerostin production. Kim and coworkers have indeed shown that sclerostin levels are increased in diabetic rats compared to controls and can be downregulated by exenatide treatment (Kim et al. 2013). More recently, they demonstrate that the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin lowers the increased levels of sclerostin induced by thiazolidinedione (Eom et al. 2016). Our own results showed that exenatide but not liraglutide decreased sclerostin levels in OVX mice (Pereira et al. 2015).
Overall, despite some controversy, the majority of clinical and experimental studies suggest that sclerostin may play a role in the decreased bone turnover in patients with T2DM and be a potential target for GLP-1 therapy. The origin of sclerostin in serum is however still unclear and more studies are required to examine whether bone production of sclerostin is affected in T2DM patients.
Osteocalcin
Osteocalcin (OC) is a small protein produced in bone by osteoblasts during bone formation, which has traditionally been used as a serum marker for bone formation (Ducy et al. 1996). This protein has however regained a different interest in recent years due to the demonstration that when it is in its uncarboxylated form (GluOC), which does not bind to bone, it can circulate, act as a hormone and regulate glucose metabolism (Lee et al. 2007). GluOC can stimulate the release of GLP-1 from the small intestine and therefore indirectly promote insulin secretion by the pancreatic cell (Mizokami et al. 2013).
It was suggested that incretins could contribute to whole body energy metabolism by modulating osteocalcin synthesis in osteoblasts. The effects of GLP-1RAs on osteocalcin production by osteoblasts were examined and once again the results are inconsistent. While Kim and coworkers and Nuche-Berenguer and coworkers demonstrate an increase in serum osteocalcin levels with exenatide in T2DM and IR rats, this was not the case with liraglutide treatment (Conte et al. 2015, Iepsen et al. 2015, Kim et al. 2013, Nuche-Berenguer et al. 2010a). A recent study demonstrates that incretins inhibit thyroid hormone-stimulated osteocalcin synthesis in osteoblasts in vitro, suggesting that incretins could stimulate bone formation by reducing the osteocalcin levels (Kainuma et al. 2016), although this is not confirmed in vivo. Osteocalcin concentration significantly increases during calcification and arterial calcification is an important complication of diabetes due to the differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells into osteoblast-like cells. Although some work demonstrates an inhibitory effect of GLP-1RAs on vascular calcifications, this is not always the case (Zhan et al. 2014, Davenport et al. 2015).
Calcitonin
Calcitonin is a peptide hormone produced by the thyroid parafollicular cells, commonly named ‘C-cells,’ that regulate calcium homeostasis (Warshawsky et al. 1980). Increases in serum calcium activate the release of calcitonin from the C-cells, which consecutively inhibits bone resorption by the osteoclast and calcium absorption by the intestine. It was therefore one of the first agents to be used as a treatment for osteoporosis. As mentioned previously, several animal studies suggest that GLP-1RAs can affect bone metabolism indirectly via the release of calcitonin by thyroid C cells, which express the GLP-1r (Lamari et al. 1996, Yamada et al. 2008). The expression of the GLP-1r in thyroid glands has indeed been documented in rodents (Bjerre Knudsen et al. 2010), but there is an uncertainty regarding its expression in humans (Hegedus et al. 2011, Gier et al. 2012). Furthermore, basal and stimulated calcitonin did not change during 1 year of liraglutide treatment (Lunati et al. 2016). Our own work demonstrates that serum levels of calcitonin were indeed increased by exenatide treatment in ovariectomised mice (Pereira et al. 2015), although this was not shown when mice were treated with liraglutide, suggesting once again that these two GLP-1 agonists may have a different mechanism of action.
Differences in mechanisms of action between liraglutide and exenatide
Some divergent skeletal effects of liraglutide and exenatide observed in clinical and experimental studies suggest possible different mechanisms of action. Although overall similar in action, liraglutide and exenatide treatments differ in several aspects mainly due to their differences in molecular structures. Indeed, liraglutide is an analogue of human-naïve GLP-1 with 97% homology, whereas exenatide only share 50% homology with human-naïve GLP-1. This molecular divergence determines the differences in pharmacokinetic profiles between liraglutide and exenatide (Jespersen et al. 2013). The half-life of liraglutide is five time longer than exenatide; therefore, exenatide treatment requires twice-daily injections in patients. Moreover, while exenatide is mainly eliminated in the kidney, liraglutide is fully degraded within the body and no specific organ or enzyme is responsible for its elimination (Giorda et al. 2014). Exenatide administration also results in higher frequency of antibody formation than that of liraglutide (Buse et al. 2011). Thus, the favourable role of liraglutide on bone fractures risk and its more potent effect in vivo could be explained in part by its similar pharmacokinetic profile with human-naïve GLP-1. On the other hand, exenatide possesses distinct absorption, elimination and antibody formation properties. Whether those different properties of exenatide could interact with some bone metabolism and turnover pathways needs to be clearly elucidated but this may explain the distinctive effects of these two GLP-1RAs on bone hormones production.
Conclusion
Based on several rodent studies, GLP-1 therapy emerges as one of the most promising anti-diabetic therapy for treating the skeletal fragility associated with diabetes. It was shown to increase bone mass, improve trabecular and cortical architectures, enhance bone strength and tissue material properties, affecting the collagen compartment rather than the mineral one. The possible mechanisms of action of GLP-1RAs on the skeleton are illustrated in Fig. 1. They are however still not very clear and different GLP-1RAs may have different means of action. Among the potential ones, the stimulation of bone blood flow by GLP-1RAs seems very interesting and extremely promising in situations of osteoporotic and diabetic fractures. Clinical data are however still lacking and those establishing the relationship between the GLP-1RA use and decrease fracture risk have been so far negative. There is therefore a need for long-term clinical studies comparing the skeletal effects of different GLP-1RAs.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this review.
Funding
Some of this work was funded by the Society for Endocrinology (Early career grant for Marie Pereira).
References
Ambrosi TH, Scialdone A, Graja A, Gohlke S, Jank AM, Bocian C, Woelk L, Fan H, Logan DW & Schurmann A et al. 2017 Adipocyte accumulation in the bone marrow during obesity and aging impairs stem cell-based hematopoietic and bone regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 20 771.e6–784.e6. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2017.02.009)
Amori RE,, Lau J & Pittas AG 2007 Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 298 194–206. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.2.194)
Aoyama E, Watari I, Podyma-Inoue KA, Yanagishita M & Ono T 2014 Expression of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and glucosedependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor is regulated by the glucose concentration in mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 34 475–482. (https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1787)
Atsumi T & Kuroki Y 1992 Role of impairment of blood supply of the femoral head in the pathogenesis of idiopathic osteonecrosis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 277 22–30. (https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199204000-00004)
Baggio LL & Drucker DJ 2007 Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology 132 2131–2157. (https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.054)
Balint E, Szabo P, Marshall CF & Sprague SM 2001 Glucose-induced inhibition of in vitro bone mineralization. Bone 28 21–28. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00426-9)
Bellido T 2014 Osteocyte-driven bone remodeling. Calcified Tissue International 94 25–34. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-013-9774-y)
Bjarnason NH, Henriksen EE,, Alexandersen P, Christgau S, Henriksen DB & Christiansen C 2002 Mechanism of circadian variation in bone resorption. Bone 30 307–313. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00662-7)
Bjerre Knudsen L, Madsen LW, Andersen S, Almholt K, De Boer AS, Drucker DJ, Gotfredsen C, Egerod FL, Hegelund AC & Jacobsen H et al. 2010 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists activate rodent thyroid C-cells causing calcitonin release and C-cell proliferation. Endocrinology 151 1473–1486. (https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-1272)
Bunck MC, Eliasson B, Corner A, Heine RJ, Shaginian RM, Taskinen MR, Yki-Jarvinen H, Smith U & Diamant M 2011 Exenatide treatment did not affect bone mineral density despite body weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 13 374–377. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01355.x)
Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, Davis KA, Masharani U, Majumdar S & Link TM 2010 High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 95 5045–5055. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0226)
Buse JB, Garber A, Rosenstock J,, Schmidt WE, Brett JH, Videbaek N, Holst J & Nauck M 2011 Liraglutide treatment is associated with a low frequency and magnitude of antibody formation with no apparent impact on glycemic response or increased frequency of adverse events: results from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (Lead) trials. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 96 1695–1702. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2822)
Cantini G, Di Franco A, Samavat J, Forti G, Mannucci E & Luconi M 2015 Effect of liraglutide on proliferation and differentiation of human adipose stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 402 43–50. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2014.12.021)
Cantini G, Mannucci E & Luconi M 2016 Perspectives in Glp-1 research: new targets, new receptors. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 27 427–438. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2016.03.017)
Chappard D, Basle MF, Legrand E & Audran M 2011 New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality. Osteoporosis International 22 2225–2240. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1573-6)
Clowes JA, Hannon RA, Yap TS, Hoyle NR, Blumsohn A & Eastell R 2002 Effect of feeding on bone turnover markers and its impact on biological variability of measurements. Bone 30 886–890. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00728-7)
Conte C, Cecere A, Guglielmi G & Napoli N 2015 Letter to the editor: “GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment increases bone formation and prevents bone loss in weight-reduced obese women” by Iepsen E.W., et al. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 100 L92–L93. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-2970)
Costa AG, Cremers S & Bilezikian JP 2017 Sclerostin measurement in human disease: validity and current limitations. Bone 96 24–28. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.012)
Davenport C, Mahmood WA, Forde H, Ashley DT, Agha A, Mcdermott J, Sreenan S, Thompson CJ, Mcgrath F & Mcadam B et al. 2015 The effects of insulin and liraglutide on osteoprotegerin and vascular calcification in vitro and in patients with type 2 diabetes. European Journal of Endocrinology 173 53–61. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-1137)
Dobnig H, Piswanger-Solkner JC, Roth M, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Tiran A, Strele A, Maier E, Maritschnegg P, Sieberer C & Fahrleitner-Pammer A 2006 Type 2 diabetes mellitus in nursing home patients: effects on bone turnover, bone mass, and fracture risk. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 91 3355–3363. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0460)
Driessen JH, Van Onzenoort HA, Henry RM, Lalmohamed A, Van Den Bergh JP, Neef C, Leufkens HG & De Vries F 2014 Use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of fracture. Bone 68 124–130. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.07.030)
Driessen JH, Henry RM, Van Onzenoort HA, Lalmohamed A, Burden AM, Prieto-Alhambra D, Neef C,, Leufkens HG & De Vries F 2015a Bone fracture risk is not associated with the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based cohort analysis. Calcified Tissue International 97 104–112. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-9993-5)
Driessen JH, Van Onzenoort HA, Starup-Linde J, Henry R, Burden AM, Neef C, Van Den Bergh JP, Vestergaard P & De Vries F 2015b Use of glucagon-like-peptide 1 receptor agonists and risk of fracture as compared to use of other anti-hyperglycemic drugs. Calcified Tissue International 97 506–515. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-0037-y)
Ducy P, Desbois C, Boyce B, Pinero G, Story B, Dunstan C, Smith E, Bonadio J, Goldstein S & Gundberg C et al. 1996 Increased bone formation in osteocalcin-deficient mice. Nature 382 448–452. (https://doi.org/10.1038/382448a0)
El Bekay R, Coin-Araguez L, Fernandez-Garcia D, Oliva-Olivera W, Bernal-Lopez R, Clemente-Postigo M, Delgado-Lista J, Diaz-Ruiz A, Guzman-Ruiz R & Vazquez-Martinez R et al. 2016 Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 on the differentiation and metabolism of human adipocytes. British Journal of Pharmacology 173 1820–1834. (https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13481)
Eom YS, Gwon AR, Kwak KM, Kim JY, Yu SH, Lee S, Kim YS, Park IB, Kim KW & Lee K et al. 2016. Protective effects of vildagliptin against pioglitazone-induced bone loss in Type 2 diabetic rats. PLoS ONE 11 e0168569. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168569)
Fadini GP, Miorin M, Facco M, Bonamico S, Baesso I, Grego F, Menegolo M, De Kreutzenberg SV, Tiengo A & Agostini C et al. 2005 Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are reduced in peripheral vascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 45 1449–1457. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.067)
Fajardo RJ 2017 Is diabetic skeletal fragility associated with microvascular complications in bone? Current Osteoporosis Reports 15 1–8. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-017-0341-8)
Falanga V 2005 Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet 366 1736–1743. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67700-8)
Farr JN, Drake MT, Amin S, Melton LJ 3rd, Mccready LK & Khosla S 2014 In vivo assessment of bone quality in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 29 787–795. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2106)
International Diabetes Federation 2015 IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation. (available at: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2015-atlas.html)
Gallagher EJ, Sun H, Kornhauser C, Tobin-Hess A, Epstein S, Yakar S & Leroith D 2014 The effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-Iv inhibition on bone in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 30 191–200. (https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2466)
Garcia-Martin A, Rozas-Moreno P, Reyes-Garcia R, Morales-Santana S, Garcia-Fontana B, Garcia-Salcedo JA & Munoz-Torres M 2012 Circulating levels of sclerostin are increased in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 97 234–241. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2186)
Gaudio A, Privitera F, Battaglia K, Torrisi V, Sidoti MH, Pulvirenti I, Canzonieri E, Tringali G & Fiore CE 2012 Sclerostin levels associated with inhibition of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and reduced bone turnover in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 97 3744–3750. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1901)
Gennari L, Merlotti D, Valenti R, Ceccarelli E, Ruvio M, Pietrini MG, Capodarca C, Franci MB, Campagna MS & Calabro A et al. 2012 Circulating sclerostin levels and bone turnover in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 97 1737–1744. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2958)
Gerdhem P, Isaksson A, Akesson K & Obrant KJ 2005 Increased bone density and decreased bone turnover, but no evident alteration of fracture susceptibility in elderly women with diabetes mellitus. Osteoporosis International 16 1506–1512. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1877-5)
Gier B, Butler PC, Lai CK, Kirakossian D, Denicola MM & Yeh MW 2012 Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor expression in the human thyroid gland. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 97 121–131. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2407)
Gilbert MP, Marre M,, Holst JJ, Garber A,, Baeres FM, Thomsen H & Pratley RE 2016 Comparison of the long-term effects of liraglutide and glimepiride monotherapy on bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocrine Practice 22 406–411. (https://doi.org/10.4158/EP15758.OR)
Giorda CB,, Nada E & Tartaglino B 2014 Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and renal or hepatic impairment. A systematic review of the literature. Endocrine 46 406–419. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0179-0)
Glorie L, Behets GJ, Baerts L, De Meester I, D’haese PC & Verhulst A 2014 DPP IV inhibitor treatment attenuates bone loss and improves mechanical bone strength in male diabetic rats. American Journal of Physiology – Endocrinology and Metabolism 307 E447–E455. (https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00217.2014)
Gremlich S, Porret A, Hani EH, Cherif D, Vionnet N, Froguel P & Thorens B 1995 Cloning, functional expression, and chromosomal localization of the human pancreatic islet glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor. Diabetes 44 1202–1208. (https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.44.10.1202)
Habib AM,, Richards P, Cairns LS,, Rogers GJ,, Bannon CA, Parker HE,, Morley TC,, Yeo GS, Reimann F & Gribble FM 2012 Overlap of endocrine hormone expression in the mouse intestine revealed by transcriptional profiling and flow cytometry. Endocrinology 153 3054–3065. (https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-2170)
Hamann C, Rauner M, Hohna Y, Bernhardt R, Mettelsiefen J, Goettsch C, Gunther KP, Stolina M, Han CY & Asuncion FJ et al. 2013 Sclerostin antibody treatment improves bone mass, bone strength, and bone defect regeneration in rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 28 627–638. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1803)
Hegedus L, Moses A, Zdravkovic M, Le Thi T & Daniels G 2011 GLP-1 and calcitonin concentration in humans: lack of evidence of calcitonin release from sequential screening in over 5000 subjects with type 2 diabetes or nondiabetic obese subjects treated with the human GLP-1 analog, liraglutide. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 96 853–860. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2318)
Holst JJ & Deacon CF 2005 Glucagon-like peptide-1 mediates the therapeutic actions of DPP-IV inhibitors. Diabetologia 48 612–615. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-005-1705-7)
Iepsen EW, Lundgren JR, Hartmann B, Pedersen O, Hansen T, Jorgensen NR, Jensen JE, Holst JJ, Madsbad S & Torekov SS 2015 Glp-1 receptor agonist treatment increases bone formation and prevents bone loss in weight-reduced obese women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 100 2909–2917. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1176)
Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, Peters AL, Tsapas A, Wender R & Matthews DR et al. 2012 Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 35 1364–1379. (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0413)
Jensen LB, Quaade F & Sorensen OH 1994 Bone loss accompanying voluntary weight loss in obese humans. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 9 459–463. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650090404)
Jespersen MJ, Knop FK & Christensen M 2013 Glp-1 agonists for type 2 diabetes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological considerations. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology 9 17–29. (https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2013.731394)
Kainuma S, Tokuda H, Fujita K, Kawabata T, Sakai G, Matsushima-Nishiwaki R, Harada A, Kozawa O & Otsuka T 2016 Attenuation by incretins of thyroid hormone-stimulated osteocalcin synthesis in osteoblasts. Biomedical Reports 5 771–775. (https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.798)
Khosravi R, Sodek KL, Faibish M & Trackman PC 2014 Collagen advanced glycation inhibits its Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 (DDR2)-mediated induction of lysyl oxidase in osteoblasts. Bone 58 33–41. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.001)
Kim JY, Lee SK, Jo KJ, Song DY, Lim DM, Park KY, Bonewald LF & Kim BJ 2013 Exendin-4 increases bone mineral density in type 2 diabetic OLETF rats potentially through the down-regulation of SOST/sclerostin in osteocytes. Life Sciences 92 533–540. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2013.01.001)
Krakauer JC, Mckenna MJ, Buderer NF, Rao DS, Whitehouse FW & Parfitt AM 1995 Bone loss and bone turnover in diabetes. Diabetes 44 775–782. (https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.44.7.775)
Kubota T, Kubota N, Kumagai H, Yamaguchi S, Kozono H, Takahashi T, Inoue M, Itoh S, Takamoto I & Sasako T et al. 2011 Impaired insulin signaling in endothelial cells reduces insulin-induced glucose uptake by skeletal muscle. Cell Metabolism 13 294–307. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.01.018)
Lamari Y, Boissard C, Moukhtar MS, Jullienne A, Rosselin G & Garel JM 1996 Expression of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor in a murine C cell line: regulation of calcitonin gene by glucagon-like peptide 1. FEBS Letters 393 248–252. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(96)00895-2)
Langlois JA, Mussolino ME, Visser M, Looker AC, Harris T & Madans J 2001 Weight loss from maximum body weight among middle-aged and older white women and the risk of hip fracture: the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Osteoporosis International 12 763–768. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170053)
Lee NK, Sowa H, Hinoi E, Ferron M, Ahn JD, Confavreux C, Dacquin R, Mee PJ, Mckee MD & Jung DY et al. 2007 Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell 130 456–469. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.047)
Lee HM, Joo BS, Lee CH, Kim HY, Ock JH & Lee YS 2015 Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on the differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into osteoblasts and adipocytes. Journal of Menopausal Medicine 21 93–103. (https://doi.org/10.6118/jmm.2015.21.2.93)
Li R, Xu W, Luo S, Xu H, Tong G, Zeng L, Zhu D & Weng J 2015 Effect of exenatide, insulin and pioglitazone on bone metabolism in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetologica 52 1083–1091. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-015-0792-2)
Loder RT 1988 The influence of diabetes mellitus on the healing of closed fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 232 210–216.
Lu N, Sun H, Yu J, Wang X, Liu D, Zhao L, Sun L, Zhao H, Tao B & Liu J 2015 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist Liraglutide has anabolic bone effects in ovariectomized rats without diabetes. PLoS ONE 10 e0132744. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132744)
Lunati ME, Grancini V, Colombo C, Palmieri E, Resi V, Perrino M,, Orsi E & Fugazzola L 2016 Basal and stimulated calcitonin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes did not change during 1 year of Liraglutide treatment. Metabolism 65 1–6. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.09.010)
Ma X, Meng J, Jia M, Bi L, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Hu J, He G & Luo X 2013 Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, prevents osteopenia by promoting bone formation and suppressing bone resorption in aged ovariectomized rats. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 28 1641–1652. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1898)
Mabilleau G 2017 Interplay between bone and incretin hormones: a review. Morphologie 101 9–18. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2016.06.004)
Mabilleau G, Mieczkowska A, Irwin N, Flatt PR & Chappard D 2013 Optimal bone mechanical and material properties require a functional glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Journal of Endocrinology 219 59–68. (https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-13-0146)
Mabilleau G, Mieczkowska A & Chappard D 2014 Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and bone fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of Diabetes 6 260–266. (https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12102)
Mabilleau G, Perrot R, Flatt PR, Irwin N & Chappard D 2016 High fat-fed diabetic mice present with profound alterations of the osteocyte network. Bone 90 99–106. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.008)
Mansur SA, Mieczkowska A, Bouvard B, Flatt PR, Chappard D, Irwin N & Mabilleau G 2015 Stable incretin mimetics counter rapid deterioration of bone quality in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Cellular Physiology 230 3009–3018. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25033)
Mcintosh CH, Widenmaier S & Kim SJ 2010 Pleiotropic actions of the incretin hormones. Vitamins and Hormones 84 21–79.
Meng J, Ma X, Wang N, Jia M, Bi L, Wang Y, Li M, Zhang H, Xue X & Hou Z et al. 2016 Activation of Glp-1 receptor promotes bone marrow stromal cell osteogenic differentiation through beta-catenin. Stem Cell Reports 6 633. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.03.010)
Mieczkowska A, Irwin N, Flatt PR, Chappard D & Mabilleau G 2013 Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (Gip) receptor deletion leads to reduced bone strength and quality. Bone 56 337–342. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.003)
Mieczkowska A, Mansur S, Bouvard B, Flatt PR, Thorens B, Irwin N, Chappard D & Mabilleau G 2015 Double incretin receptor knock-out (DIRKO) mice present with alterations of trabecular and cortical micromorphology and bone strength. Osteoporosis International 26 209–218. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2845-8)
Mima A 2016 Incretin-based therapy for prevention of diabetic vascular complications. Journal of Diabetes Research 2016 12. (https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1379274)
Mizokami A, Yasutake Y, Gao J, Matsuda M, Takahashi I, Takeuchi H & Hirata M 2013 Osteocalcin induces release of glucagon-like peptide-1 and thereby stimulates insulin secretion in mice. PLoS ONE 8 e57375. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057375)
Monami M, Dicembrini I, Antenore A & Mannucci E 2011 Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and bone fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Care 34 2474–2476. (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1099)
Naot D, Musson DS & Cornish J 2017 The activity of adiponectin in bone. Calcified Tissue International 100 486–499. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-016-0216-5)
Napoli N, Chandran M, Pierroz DD, Abrahamsen B, Schwartz AV, Ferrari SL, IOF Bone & Diabetes Working Group 2017 Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 13 208–219. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.153)
Nuche-Berenguer B, Moreno P, Portal-Nunez S, Dapia S, Esbrit P & Villanueva-Penacarrillo ML 2010a Exendin-4 exerts osteogenic actions in insulin-resistant and type 2 diabetic states. Regulatory Peptides 159 61–66. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regpep.2009.06.010)
Nuche-Berenguer B, Portal-Nunez S, Moreno P, Gonzalez N, Acitores A, Lopez-Herradon A, Esbrit P, Valverde I & Villanueva-Penacarrillo ML 2010b Presence of a functional receptor for GLP-1 in osteoblastic cells, independent of the cAMP-linked GLP-1 receptor. Journal of Cellular Physiology 225 585–592. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22243)
Nuche-Berenguer B, Lozano D, Gutierrez-Rojas I, Moreno P, Marinoso ML, Esbrit P & Villanueva-Penacarrillo ML 2011 Glp-1 and exendin-4 can reverse hyperlipidic-related osteopenia. Journal of Endocrinology 209 203–210. (https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-11-0015)
Nystrom T, Gutniak MK, Zhang Q, Zhang F, Holst JJ, Ahren B & Sjoholm A 2004 Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes patients with stable coronary artery disease. American Journal of Physiology – Endocrinology and Metabolism 287 E1209–E1215. (https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00237.2004)
Ominsky MS, Vlasseros F, Jolette J,, Smith SY,, Stouch B, Doellgast G, Gong J, Gao Y, Cao J & Graham K et al. 2010 Two doses of sclerostin antibody in cynomolgus monkeys increases bone formation, bone mineral density, and bone strength. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 25 948–959. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.14)
Orskov C, Rabenhoj L, Wettergren A, Kofod H & Holst JJ 1994 Tissue and plasma concentrations of amidated and glycine-extended glucagon-like peptide I in humans. Diabetes 43 535–539. (https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.43.4.535)
Pacheco-Pantoja EL, Ranganath LR, Gallagher JA, Wilson PJ & Fraser WD 2011 Receptors and effects of gut hormones in three osteoblastic cell lines. BMC Physiology 11 12. (https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-11-12)
Patsch JM, Burghardt AJ, Yap SP, Baum T, Schwartz AV,, Joseph GB & Link TM 2013 Increased cortical porosity in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women with fragility fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 28 313–324. (https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1763)
Pereira M, Jeyabalan J, Jorgensen CS, Hopkinson M, Al-Jazzar A, Roux JP, Chavassieux P, Orriss IR, Cleasby ME & Chenu C 2015 Chronic administration of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists improves trabecular bone mass and architecture in ovariectomised mice. Bone 81 459–467. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.08.006)
Pereira M, Gohin S, Lund N, Hvid A, Smitham PJ, Oddy MJ, Reichert I, Farlay D, Roux JP & Cleasby ME et al. 2017 Sclerostin does not play a major role in the pathogenesis of skeletal complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Osteoporosis International 28 309–320.
Piec I, Washbourne C, Tang J, Fisher E, Greeves J, Jackson S & Fraser WD 2016 How accurate is your sclerostin measurement? Comparison between three commercially available sclerostin Elisa kits. Calcified Tissue International 98 546–555. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-0105-3)
Ramasamy SK, Kusumbe AP,, Schiller M, Zeuschner D, Bixel MG, Milia C, Gamrekelashvili J,, Limbourg A,, Medvinsky A, & Santoro MM, et al.2016 Blood flow controls bone vascular function and osteogenesis. Nature Communications 7 13601. (https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13601)
Rigato M, Bittante C, Albiero M, Avogaro A & Fadini GP 2015 Circulating progenitor cell count predicts microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 100 2666–2672. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1687)
Roan JN, Cheng HN, Young CC, Lee CJ, Yeh ML, Luo CY, Tsai YS & Lam CF 2017 Exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, accelerates diabetic wound healing. Journal of Surgical Research 208 93–103. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.024)
Roforth MM,, Fujita K, Mcgregor UI, Kirmani S,, Mccready LK, Peterson JM, Drake MT, Monroe DG & Khosla S 2014 Effects of age on bone mRNA levels of sclerostin and other genes relevant to bone metabolism in humans. Bone 59, 1–6. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.019)
Saito M, Fujii K, Mori Y & Marumo K 2006 Role of collagen enzymatic and glycation induced cross-links as a determinant of bone quality in spontaneously diabetic Wbn/Kob rats. Osteoporosis International 17 1514–1523. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0155-5)
Schwartz AV, Hillier TA, Sellmeyer DE, Resnick HE, Gregg E, Ensrud KE, Schreiner PJ, Margolis KL, Cauley JA & Nevitt MC et al. 2002 Older women with diabetes have a higher risk of falls: a prospective study. Diabetes Care 25 1749–1754. (https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.10.1749)
Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Sellmeyer DE, Feingold KR, De Rekeneire N, Strotmeyer ES, Shorr RI, Vinik AI, Odden MC & Park SW et al. 2008 Diabetes-related complications, glycemic control, and falls in older adults. Diabetes Care 31 391–396. (https://doi.org/10.2337/dbib7-1152)
Schwartz AV, Garnero P, Hillier TA,, Sellmeyer DE, Strotmeyer ES,, Feingold KR,, Resnick HE,, Tylavsky FA, Black DM & Cummings SR, et al.2009 Pentosidine and increased fracture risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 94 2380–2386. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2498)
Schwartz AV, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Hillier TA, Strotmeyer ES, Ensrud KE, Donaldson MG, Cauley JA, Harris TB & Koster A et al. 2011 Association of Bmd and Frax score with risk of fracture in older adults with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 305 2184–2192. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.715)
Sellmeyer DE, Civitelli R, Hofbauer LC, Khosla S, Lecka-Czernik B & Schwartz AV 2016 Skeletal metabolism, fracture risk, and fracture outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 65 1757–1766. (https://doi.org/10.2337/db16-0063)
Shu A, Yin MT, Stein E, Cremers S, Dworakowski E, Ives R & Rubin MR 2012 Bone structure and turnover in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Osteoporosis International 23 635–641. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1595-0)
Smits MM, Muskiet MH, Tonneijck L, Kramer MH,, Diamant M, Van Raalte DH & Serne EH 2015 Glp-1 receptor agonist exenatide increases capillary perfusion independent of nitric oxide in healthy overweight men. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 35 1538–1543. (https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305447)
Su B, Sheng H, Zhang M, Bu L, Yang P, Li L, Li F, Sheng C, Han Y, Qu S & Wang J 2015 Risk of bone fractures associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists’ treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine 48 107–115. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0361-4)
Sufiun A, Rafiq K, Fujisawa Y, Rahman A, Mori H, Nakano D, Kobori H, Ohmori K, Masaki T & Kohno M et al. 2015 Effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition on circadian blood pressure during the development of salt-dependent hypertension in rats. Hypertension Research 38 237–243. (https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2014.173)
Sun HX, Lu N, Luo X,, Zhao L & Liu JM 2015 Liraglutide, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has anabolic bone effects in diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Journal of Diabetes 7 584–588. (https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12282)
Sun HX, Lu N, Liu DM,, Zhao L,, Sun LH,, Zhao HY, Liu JM & Tao B 2016 The bone-preserving effects of exendin-4 in ovariectomized rats. Endocrine 51 323–332. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0667-x)
Tanaka K, Saisho Y, Kawai T, Tanaka M, Meguro S, Irie J, Imai T, Shigihara T, Morimoto J & Yajima K et al. 2015a Efficacy and safety of liraglutide monotherapy compared with metformin in Japanese overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Endocrine Journal 62 399–409. (https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0602)
Tanaka K, Yamaguchi T, Kanazawa I & Sugimoto T 2015b Effects of high glucose and advanced glycation end products on the expressions of sclerostin and Rankl as well as apoptosis in osteocyte-like Mlo-Y4-A2 cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 461 193–199. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.091)
Vestergaard P 2007 Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes – a meta-analysis. Osteoporosis International 18 427–444. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0253-4)
Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L & Mosekilde L 2005 Relative fracture risk in patients with diabetes mellitus, and the impact of insulin and oral antidiabetic medication on relative fracture risk. Diabetologia 48 1292–1299. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-005-1786-3)
Vogt MT, Cauley JA, Kuller LH & Nevitt MC 1997 Bone mineral density and blood flow to the lower extremities: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 12 283–289. (https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.2.283)
Wang A, Li T, An P, Yan W, Zheng H, Wang B & Mu Y 2017 Exendin-4 upregulates adiponectin level in adipocytes via Sirt1/Foxo-1 signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 12 e0169469. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169469)
Warshawsky H, Goltzman D, Rouleau MF & Bergeron JJ 1980 Direct in vivo demonstration by radioautography of specific binding sites for calcitonin in skeletal and renal tissues of the rat. Journal of Cell Biology 85 682–694. (https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.85.3.682)
Weston C, Lu J, Li N, Barkan K, Richards GO, Roberts DJ, Skerry TM, Poyner D, Pardamwar M & Reynolds CA et al. 2015 Modulation of glucagon receptor pharmacology by receptor activity-modifying protein-2 (RAMP2). Journal of Biological Chemistry 290 23009–23022. (https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.624601)
Yamada Y, Hayami T, Nakamura K, Kaisaki PJ, Someya Y, Wang CZ, Seino S & Seino Y 1995 Human gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor: cloning of the gene (GIPR) and cDNA. Genomics 29 773–776. (https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1995.9937)
Yamada C, Yamada Y, Tsukiyama K, Yamada K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Tanaka K, Drucker DJ, Seino Y & Inagaki N 2008 The murine glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor is essential for control of bone resorption. Endocrinology 149 574–579. (https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-1292)
Yamamoto M, Yamaguchi T, Yamauchi M, Yano S & Sugimoto T 2008 Serum pentosidine levels are positively associated with the presence of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 93 1013–1019. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1270)
Yu OH,, Richards B, Berger C, Josse RG, Leslie WD, Goltzman D, Kaiser SM, Kovacs CS & Davison KS 2017 The association between sclerostin and incident type 2 diabetes risk: a cohort study. Clinical Endocrinology 86 520–525. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13300)
Zhan JK,, Tan P,, Wang YJ, Wang Y,, He JY,, Tang ZY, Huang W & Liu YS 2014 Exenatide can inhibit calcification of human VSMCs through the NF-kappaB/RANKL signaling pathway. Cardiovascular Diabetology 13 153. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-014-0153-4)
Zhou X, Huang CH, Lao J, Pocai A, Forrest G, Price O, Roy S, Kelley DE, Sullivan KA & Forrest MJ 2015 Acute hemodynamic and renal effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 analog and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor in rats. Cardiovascular Diabetology 14 29. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-015-0194-3)